They try to tase him and it doesn't do anything, so they blow him away.
Video: Overkill? Cop's Shoot Suspect Armed With A Crowbar 10 Times!
(It's not really graphic from the camera's angle so even if you're squeamish at stuff like this, it's okay to watch).
I don't know. I've watched this a few times now and it just looks like complete abuse of force. Something doesn't add up. I really don't know the backstory but it just doesn't look right to me.
The guys filming the video are obviously immune to feeling who can't stop laughing at tragedy, but besides that, what do you think?
I'll be interested to see the news story on this, if one exists.
And you know this for sure how?a few shots to the leg, or even just one shot would have been enough.
Really? What else would he be intending to be doing? Either way you still have the right to defend yourself with deadly force when someone is trying to do bodily harm to you that has the potential to kill you. I would say swinging a crowbar at you is trying to do bodily harm and could kill you... I know I wouldn't say "wait, he might hit me where it won't kill me."Just because the guy had a crowbar and swung it doesn't mean he had intent to kill.
It's pretty easy to judge someone that's in harms way when you have the luxury of watching video replays on the internet.
I don't know... I can't even read half the shit people type on that site.The tone of the responses on this board is much different than the comments on WSHH...why is that?
use batons for what they did what they needed to do if he was dumb enough to do sum shit like that in brod day light then he needed to go anyways he would have done some more dumb shit later and i be damn if this shit were to be goin dwn and they did use some batons and aressted him then he went to jail and did his lil 3 or 4 yrs then got out and killed someone you knw or some shit how wld you feel if sum shit like that happeded to u he needed..
The tone of the responses on this board is much different than the comments on WSHH...why is that?
And you know this for sure how?
Really? What else would he be intending to be doing? Either way you still have the right to defend yourself with deadly force when someone is trying to do bodily harm to you that has the potential to kill you. I would say swinging a crowbar at you is trying to do bodily harm and could kill you... I know I wouldn't say "wait, he might hit me where it won't kill me."
It's pretty easy to judge someone that's in harms way when you have the luxury of watching video replays on the internet.
you obviously didnt read the response. They could set the dog on him, shot his legs to disable. i shot into his legs would have pretty much floored him. The cop shot him 3 times whilst standing and then carried on shooting til his emptied his cartridge while he was on the floor.
Here's an interesting question...
Let's say this guy with an axe was threatening some people in public, only this time there are no cops. Then a civilian pulls a gun on him and tells him to gtfo. The axeman raises his weapon, ready to attack...and the civilian fires 11 rounds. Does the civilian go to jail or is that self defense?
Just because the guy had a crowbar and swung it doesn't mean he had intent to kill.
The tone of the responses on this board is much different than the comments on WSHH...why is that?
Because we're not blacks with a criminal, anti-social mindset (ok maybe a few berries here and there) ?
You have both a reading comprehension problem and an observation problem. Consider for a moment that a tazer in the face didn't even slow him down.
The reason for not shooting him in the leg when he's lunging at someone with an axe should therefore be painfully obvious.
Cops don't shoot to wing someone. A person can still function for a considerable amount of time even when filled with holes.
I see you're blind as well as dumb.. It;'s not like the cop shot once and waited to see if he's disabled/disarmed, he first a burst of 3 rounds at first, then he fell to the ground, and then fired 4 more to finish him off.The cop shot him 5 times center mass and he was still standing and still capable of turning to swing again. He only went down from the second volley of 5 rounds. The cop did not empty his "magazine" (which is what you're trying to say).
Read what you want to read and see what you want to see, but a little logical thinking would do you some good.
What does it mean? he is SUPERMAN? He is immune from eloctrocution? No dipshit, taser misfired, maybe battery failed, whatever.
The cop was pretty far away, no way in striking range, a shot on the leg would stop him on his tracks, a dog woud stop him in his tracks, an attack with a heavy object like that requires a full swing, you can't jab with that it's too heavy.
If they have a gun that's understandable, but when they have a slow and heavy weapon like a crowbar or axe.. a shot on the leg would ground them, they would not be able to run at you or dash towards you, if they do, then shoot them ahain.
I see you're blind as well as dumb.. It;'s not like the cop shot once and waited to see if he's disabled/disarmed, he first a burst of 3 rounds at first, then he fell to the ground, and then fired 4 more to finish him off.
Yeah a little logic would be REEEEAL useful.