I wouldn't be surprised if this "cure" just fades into the darkness in a few years. I recently saw a talk by a biologist who stated that cancer should be thought of as a cure rather than a disease.
Here was her reasoning:
Cancers usually show up in areas of your body that has been damaged. example: smoking too much causes lung damage so you get lung cancer. Since your cells are dieing in that area, your body's natural response is to make more cells to replace the damaged ones. In doing so, cancer is activated to speed the production of cells. But since our bodies can't turn off this mass production, we get sick from it. And this sets off a whole new field of research for this biologist which will probably take her entire life to complete. Hopefully she does find an answer. Seems very interesting to me.
Here was her reasoning:
Cancers usually show up in areas of your body that has been damaged. example: smoking too much causes lung damage so you get lung cancer. Since your cells are dieing in that area, your body's natural response is to make more cells to replace the damaged ones. In doing so, cancer is activated to speed the production of cells. But since our bodies can't turn off this mass production, we get sick from it. And this sets off a whole new field of research for this biologist which will probably take her entire life to complete. Hopefully she does find an answer. Seems very interesting to me.