I can't believe no one has started a thread about the NSA shit from this week...



I'm not American, but I mad respect Edward Snowden. I think we should all help him, as he is now holed up in Hongkong, may die in an accidental death, or deported and never been seen again.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/pardon-edward-snowden/Dp03vGYD

https://www.crowdtilt.com/campaigns/reward-edward-snowden-for-courageously-leaking-nsa-docs

I will write it in stone so I can look back to see this after it happens Edward Snowden death by boston brakes poor bastard.
 
Another round on the way:

I haven't been able to write this week here because I've been participating in the debate over the fallout from last week's NSA stories, and because we are very busy working on and writing the next series of stories that will begin appearing very shortly. I did, though, want to note a few points, and particularly highlight what Democratic Rep. Loretta Sanchez said after Congress on Wednesday was given a classified briefing by NSA officials on the agency's previously secret surveillance activities:

"What we learned in there is significantly more than what is out in the media today. . . . I can't speak to what we learned in there, and I don't know if there are other leaks, if there's more information somewhere, if somebody else is going to step up, but I will tell you that I believe it's the tip of the iceberg . . . . I think it's just broader than most people even realize, and I think that's, in one way, what astounded most of us, too."
The Congresswoman is absolutely right: what we have reported thus far is merely "the tip of the iceberg" of what the NSA is doing in spying on Americans and the world. She's also right that when it comes to NSA spying, "there is significantly more than what is out in the media today", and that's exactly what we're working to rectify.
...

A lot more in the article. Dude writes like a boss.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/14/nsa-partisanship-propaganda-prism
 
Steve Gibson of security now had an interesting podcast this week. He dug up a bunch of affidavits from court cases. One was a former AT&T engineer who explains how AT&T built this secret room in their San Fran location. Basically this was at one of the main trunks for the Internet. He goes on to explain how they were "splitting" light (like a prism)in that room. Basically in stead of the NSA hacking servers they would re-route the traffic before it even got to companies like google and face book. So basically we are being fed the wrong words ( imagine that). So any time you see the word server just replace it with router and things will make more sense

It was a great listen and he's got all the docs linked

http://twit.tv/show/security-now/408
 
250,000 people signed up to the class-action lawsuit in 2 days:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DyqFhcKgpQ]Rand Paul: 250K People In 2 Days Sign Up For Legal Case Against NSA - YouTube[/ame]
 

Again, you're incorrect. From your article:


The N.S.A. hacked into target computers to snare messages before they were encrypted. In some cases, companies say they were coerced by the government into handing over their master encryption keys or building in a back door. And the agency used its influence as the world’s most experienced code maker to covertly introduce weaknesses into the encryption standards followed by hardware and software developers around the world.

Absolutely none of those things have to do with:

There is no general-use encryption that isn't unencrypted in near real time by the NSA.

Reading comprehension, you should practice it.