ISideWith
- Thread starter conv3rsion
- Start date
I put Ron Paul's positions as I understand them in and this is the result:
Something tells me their algorithm was written by a GJ supporter. Hmm.
Of course I just couldn't bring myself to putting the evolution answer in that nazicakes is about to call me out on, but other than that these are Paul's answers.
The fact that Obomba and R$ aren't so close together on the percentage is worrysome too. It SHOULD say for my answers above:
Paul: 99%
GJ: 95%
R$: 25%
O: 20%
So, they aren't perfect. But it's certainly useful for couch potates that don't know where they stand and are too lazy to do research themselves.
Something tells me their algorithm was written by a GJ supporter. Hmm.
Of course I just couldn't bring myself to putting the evolution answer in that nazicakes is about to call me out on, but other than that these are Paul's answers.
The fact that Obomba and R$ aren't so close together on the percentage is worrysome too. It SHOULD say for my answers above:
Paul: 99%
GJ: 95%
R$: 25%
O: 20%
So, they aren't perfect. But it's certainly useful for couch potates that don't know where they stand and are too lazy to do research themselves.
100% johnson
96% paul
71% goode
65% romney
99% libertarian
65% repub
edit: thats interesting. put yes to evolution, could be the only stance i disagree with regarding rp in this survey.
http://www.isidewith.com/results/18137281
96% paul
71% goode
65% romney
99% libertarian
65% repub
edit: thats interesting. put yes to evolution, could be the only stance i disagree with regarding rp in this survey.
http://www.isidewith.com/results/18137281