Israeli News Reports Obama promising attack on Iran by next June

I think they could use another currency other then the usd if they wanted, there is always talk of this.. also they might not have to wait much longer.. the fed may print so much it becomes a mute point.

I have never killed anyone, so you cant use the "we" here.... on the capital gains i was just talking capital gains to another point from a user here.

How many have been killed in war, nobody really knows the answer to that.
I like the usa calling the shots, not perfect.. but better then say iran calling the shots..

How about iran being as powerful as the us is... what a different world it would be.... hmmmmm

Right, because someone HAS to run the world...mate, I'm not even going to bother vivisecting your shit. Just read more books, clearly you're not very wise on these things. No offense meant, but you're just not educated or very well read on foreign policy.
 


Why? Is Iran supposed to be more dangerous than North Korea or Pakistan?[/QUOTE]

I think with a nuclear arsenal, it could be yes.

What is your view, if all had nukes .. what would be the more dangerous?
 
I think with a nuclear arsenal, it could be yes.

What is your view, if all had nukes .. what would be the more dangerous?

What, exactly, would Iran do to us with nukes (assuming that is even what their program is for)? They can't hurt us even if they wanted to.

If you're instead worried about terrorists with nukes, why not care more about all those soviet nukes that are floating around somewhere out there. Aren't they a more pressing threat?
 
Oh please, anyone crying about nukes is a total retard. The DoD already knows the location of every single dirty bomb and nuclear warhead because radioactive isotopes emit waste that can be detected *from space*.
 
Oh please, anyone crying about nukes is a total retard. The DoD already knows the location of every single dirty bomb and nuclear warhead because radioactive isotopes emit waste that can be detected *from space*.

I'm not crying about nukes--I'm pointing out how stupid it is to cry about nukes, though maybe I didn't make that clear enough.
 
I think they could use another currency other then the usd if they wanted, there is always talk of this..
Talk is cheap. The last two men to try it were Saddam and Daffy.


also they might not have to wait much longer.. the fed may print so much it becomes a mute point.
The word is "moot." And you sound like you're happy to see the fall of western civilization with this sentence. Instead of a hyperinflation doomsday, and instead of making endless unconstitutional wars and "democracy" building, wouldn't it instead be a not-so-evil thing to just not support the lesser of two evils that gave you all these things?


I have never killed anyone, so you cant use the "we" here....
If you voted for any of the past presidents in our lifetimes, there is indeed some blood on your hands personally... Unless the voting machines never worked at all. (Jury is still out on that one.)

How many have been killed in war, nobody really knows the answer to that.
Don't do that. It's like you're justifying for the millions of deaths yourself. Be bigger than that. Be Human.


I like the usa calling the shots, not perfect.. but better then say iran calling the shots..
And how would you know that?

Literally? On what knowledge are you basing that opinion on? One that CNN fed you?

And even if they are religious extremists, which I kinda doubt, why would they even get a CHANCE to "call the shots" if we weren't doing so?

There was never any scenario where this world would have let Iran "Call any shots." They don't have enough resources, & they aren't that big, either.


How about iran being as powerful as the us is... what a different world it would be.... hmmmmm
And they would get that powerful because....? Please stop bringing unicorns and fairys into this conversation.

You really need to unload your mind of this rubbish the MSM stuffed into your head. You're making decisions based upon lies. Those lies serve the establishment's purpose, because with you thinking this way, you vote for Evil... And give them the power to keep being evil.
 
Oh please, anyone crying about nukes is a total retard. The DoD already knows the location of every single dirty bomb and nuclear warhead because radioactive isotopes emit waste that can be detected *from space*.

Every nuclear warhead on the face of the Earth? No they dont know.... and you can move them around... various ways... not that easy nuclear war.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iesXUFOlWC0]dr. strangelove - survival plan - YouTube[/ame]



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4VlruVG81w]Dr. Strangelove - Ending - YouTube[/ame]
 
I'm not crying about nukes--I'm pointing out how stupid it is to cry about nukes, though maybe I didn't make that clear enough.

Didn't mean to aim it directly at you. Was still pissed at that kid talking about Iran being a 'terrorist nation'. What the fuck do you think the US is doing in syria right now idiot? Otherthrowing a *DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVERNMENT*. Wow, I'd love for china to threaten to invade the US unless we elected a Dick Cheney V 2.0 to the whitehouse. I wonder how that would go.
 
Are you really that naive? Basing your knowledge on dr. strangelove when the dod will tell you straight up on their website that they have known since the 80s lol? Fool.


Thanks for all the name calling, if you think the dod knows where all the nukes are on the face of the earth... so at any time they can take them out is nonsense.

Moving them on trucks and rail and subs keep them safe from attack, a nuke is powerful but you need to get close to take it out.

its not so easy to target the weapons.
 
Thanks for all the name calling, if you think the dod knows where all the nukes are on the face of the earth... so at any time they can take them out is nonsense.

Moving them on trucks and rail and subs keep them safe from attack, a nuke is powerful but you need to get close to take it out.

its not so easy to target the weapons.

I'm so confused. Even if you're 100% correct, why would we care about a nuke on a train in the middle of nowhere?
 
It's not that they fear iran will use a nuke, the problem they have is the leverage it will give them when they eventually reach that point. Once Iran has a nuke no one can fuck with them. The same way no one fucks with North Korea or Pakistan now, or USSR a few decades ago.

All this shit is about their interests, not about anyones safety. The 'terror' bullshit is thrown around so they can fuck other countries up the ass and take their oil, and they've been doing it for 60 years. They also don't give a fuck about democracy, otherwise the CIA wouldn't have overthrown Iran's democratically elected, secular Prime Minister back in 1953. Interesting how as soon as mossadegh tried to nationalise Iran's oil industry, the CIA and british MI6 step in and throw him out.

If you take a map you can see the US has military bases all around Iran. It's not a coincidence that the countries they've been getting involved with are all conveniently in the same oil rich part of the world. Iran's next on their list, they've been planning this for a while.
 
Thanks for all the name calling, if you think the dod knows where all the nukes are on the face of the earth... so at any time they can take them out is nonsense.

Moving them on trucks and rail and subs keep them safe from attack, a nuke is powerful but you need to get close to take it out.

its not so easy to target the weapons.

1. You're failing to get the point (try and use your brain mate). If they noticed any movement AT ALL indicating that nuclear weapons were in hostile possession and were getting within close proximity of the US and "her allies", they would act on this information. They already have.

2. You wanna know how I know I'm right and you're just blowing smoke out of your ass? I can do this:

US Satellite Detection Of Portable Nuclear Weapons

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sensing-sensors/readings/GPS_History-MR614.appb.pdf

Vela (satellite) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and you can't do anything but talk stupid shit. You're wasting my fucking time and I'm trying to catch up on this season of breaking bad.

[SIZE=+1]"If an internal nuclear attack ever occurs in this country without a
major failure of our satellite assets...perhaps we should rethink just who the
enemy really is..."
[/SIZE]
 
I'm so confused. Even if you're 100% correct, why would we care about a nuke on a train in the middle of nowhere?

I was answering another user, saying the dod knew all locations (i guess at all times) were every nuke weapon is (H bomb maybe also Neutron) weapons are.

icbm on a truck moving around, is hard to hit.

Subs, all the best high tech is on these things, very hard to track.. any info on them is thin to say the least.

Why are there detectors at ports etc.. if we can see the location from space?

Any thing given off for a footprint, im sure can be taken down to some extent.

Counter Measures, the best ones are on subs... im sure by now they have stealth type weapons you can hardly see.. by then its too late...

nukes on a sub, 5 min or less warning to detonation on a large us city.

Not talking iran here, not many have access to high tech subs with icbm nukes or nuke cruise missiles.
 
1. You're failing to get the point (try and use your brain mate). If they noticed any movement AT ALL indicating that nuclear weapons were in hostile possession and were getting within close proximity of the US and "her allies", they would act on this information. They already have.

2. You wanna know how I know I'm right and you're just blowing smoke out of your ass? I can do this:

US Satellite Detection Of Portable Nuclear Weapons

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sensing-sensors/readings/GPS_History-MR614.appb.pdf

Vela (satellite) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and you can't do anything but talk stupid shit. You're wasting my fucking time and I'm trying to catch up on this season of breaking bad.


[/SIZE]


There have been cat and mouse games with subs for many years, if a sat could know where they were at all times... why risk it?

subs with nukes, not knowing were they were, subs tracking subs... to know the locations of them.. that have nukes.
 
It's not that they fear iran will use a nuke, the problem they have is the leverage it will give them when they eventually reach that point. Once Iran has a nuke no one can fuck with them. The same way no one fucks with North Korea or Pakistan now, or USSR a few decades ago.

All this shit is about their interests, not about anyones safety. The 'terror' bullshit is thrown around so they can fuck other countries up the ass and take their oil, and they've been doing it for 60 years. They also don't give a fuck about democracy, otherwise the CIA wouldn't have overthrown Iran's democratically elected, secular Prime Minister back in 1953. Interesting how as soon as mossadegh tried to nationalise Iran's oil industry, the CIA and british MI6 step in and throw him out.

If you take a map you can see the US has military bases all around Iran. It's not a coincidence that the countries they've been getting involved with are all conveniently in the same oil rich part of the world. Iran's next on their list, they've been planning this for a while.

Well said...