Joseph and Mary... I lulz

kblessinggr

PedoBeard
Sep 15, 2008
5,723
80
0
G.R., Michigan
www.kbeezie.com
Joseph and Mary in bed – obscene or illuminating? – This Just In - CNN.com Blogs

c1main.nz.church.board.jpg


A billboard showing a somber Mary and Joseph laying in bed together with the caption "Poor Joseph. God was a hard act to follow," is controversial, but not obscene, according to a decision by New Zealand's Advertising Standards Authorities.

The billboard, posted outside St. Matthew-in-the-city Anglican Church in Auckland, New Zealand, sparked outrage and vandalism by locals who "consider the sexually and suggestive illustration of the nativity to be degrading to individuals and Christian groups," according to a complaint filed with the ASA regarding the billboard that was posted before Christmas last year.

The debate led to a slew of complaints being filed with the ASA over the nature of the billboard, to ensure it was not put up again.

"I consider it inappropriate for a child's perceptive of Christmas to be distorted in a perverse and sexual manner," the complaint said.

The billboard was put up in December, was vandalized, stolen and then put up again before being stolen yet again. The two billboards were up for a total of less than 12 hours before they were both taken, according to the complaint. Another two versions of the ad were later put up and also vandalized before being stolen, according to the complaint.

The church said while they know some people were offended by the billboard, others "found it amusing and thought-provoking but liberating as well."

"The billboard, while outraging what I believe to be a minority has managed to bring a discussion of religion and theology to kitchen tables in 177 countries if our Web site statistics can be believed," the church stated in its argument to the ASA.

Ultimately, the ASA agreed, saying because there were no naked people or sexual acts depicted on the billboard, while children could see it, they likely wouldn't understand it. The ASA ruled there were no ethical problems with the billboard which had been prepared with a "due sense of social responsibility" so offended adults were likely more angry because the billboard conflicted with their views of faith - not because of anything offensive or obscene in the billboard.

I actually chuckled a bit, but its more humorous to find that so many people would vandalize and even 'steal' the billboard within 12 hours of it's posting each time. Its like the brainless sheeple's are hurt too much to actually have a philosophical thought within themselves.
 


lol i swear churches are the king of marketing wit these days. Every church in my city always has hilarious shit on their signs.
 
that's kinda offensive and if someone did a billboard like that with muslims and some joke on mohammed, there'd be uproar, all i'm saying.

don't twist facts. much of the uproar related to that incident is b/c they believe mohammed cannot be pictured in any way, shape or form. even a harmless stick figure implying that it's mohammed is a no go. it's just part of their belief, much like your belief system finds this offensive.
 
The fact that Joseph, Marry and Jesus were real people have more archeological documentation then Socrates. I wont get into the spiritual argument. Another fact of the matter is Joseph and Marry did have other kids. The Billboard is inaccurate.
 
^^
When you have the #1 best selling book ever, have a day named after you, and create one the greatest and culture penetrating followings without raising a fist. I might listen but for now you should stop talking smack; and learn something. He obviously knows a thing or two about people. Whether you belive in spirits or not.
 

Dunno what this proves other then "most" Muslims have had a track record of not depicting Mohammed since the 16th century. So you pretty much just supported his argument.

Most of the other pics are by Christian conquerors, Christian Capitalists, or haters and other infidels.

So that's your own fail.