Man gets Blowjob - ordered to pay child support



Looking at the moral of the story I find it slightly ironic that it's ok for guys to play games but not ok for women

are you really blind enough to compare attempting to trap a man into paying child support for the next 18 years to allowing a deceitful bitch to continue to fool herself for a few days? one is a could be called a "game," the other most definitely could not.
 
first time i have ever heard a story like this. sure, women lie about being on the pill etc. but this takes it to a whole new level.
 
Looking at the moral of the story I find it slightly ironic that it's ok for guys to play games but not ok for women.

Here's the real moral of the story: When your an asshole, don't be surprised when the people you surround yourselves with are assholes.


Under that same logic, then I guess you blame the Jew's, it was their fault for surrounding themselves with German Natzi assholes. Also those damn Tutsis, also those damn Tibetans, etc.

MediumThumbnail.jpg
 
I've heard that a lot, and I'm not sure I buy it.

There are plenty of nice guys who get fucked by conniving bitches, and plenty of nice girls who have the same happen to them.

The only difference is, the legal system supports and protects women who want to screw guys over. Look at the OP's story for example.

I don't think any amount of rationalization can justify that.

QFT ----
 
personally I'd sue for full custody claiming the bitch if fucking nuts and pay a nanny $50,000 a year rather than the crazy exfiance. Fuck her. Take away what she really wanted to begin with.
 
Looking at the moral of the story I find it slightly ironic that it's ok for guys to play games but not ok for women.

Here's the real moral of the story: When your an asshole, don't be surprised when the people you surround yourselves with are assholes.

Under that same logic, then I guess you blame the Jew's, it was their fault for surrounding themselves with German Natzi assholes. Also those damn Tutsis, also those damn Tibetans, etc.

MediumThumbnail.jpg


More coherently put: you presume the guy got fucked over by an asshole woman because he is an asshole. This is implying that he 'deserved it'. If this wasn't being implied, then why would you state:

...Here's the real moral of the story: When your an asshole, don't be surprised when the people you surround yourselves with are assholes.

Now your presumption might be correct, but it also might not be correct. Your logic if faulty, because by presuming that the victim is the victim because they deserve it, then it could be presumed that all victims are victims because 'they deserve it'. Including the jews in WW2, serbs, tutsies, any other victim of injustice.

To put an example of the principles I'm discussing, I'm sure when you see a rape case in the paper, you don't think 'little tease got what she deserved'.

Some people, will see a case of a pretty girl getting raped, and the person will think: 'little tease got what she deserved'. Now, I'm of the opinion, and I'm sure you will agree with me, that people that think this way are fucking sick. A person who thinks this way is a woman hater, because this type of behavior, even if partially justified (i.e. she was flaunting her beauty at him all night, rubbing up against him, kissing him, teasing him, etc, then had a 'semi-rape' where she was half consenting and half not, [there are sick bitches that do this]) it is still disgusting behavior on the part of the guy. Fact is, rape just ain't justified.

And so I feel of this case. The poor guy got bambooseled, and the first thing you think of is 'guy got what he deserved'. To me, this type of jumping to conclusions in face of an obvious injustice, shows a man hater, which is just as despicable as a woman hater.

Your presumptions give insight into a twisted point of view. Hense, my criticism. I will admit I was tired, and likely even drinking, so I did not come off quite as I should have.

I will note, that I realize you might just be trolling me, in which case, damn you! :p
 
More coherently put: you presume the guy got fucked over by an asshole woman because he is an asshole. This is implying that he 'deserved it'. If this wasn't being implied, then why would you state:


I'm going to stop you right there. He's an asshole because of the line:
Get a vasectomy but keep it a secret.

Why would he keep it a secret? I'll tell you why. He thinks most women won't sleep with him unless they can get pregnant (sad and ridiculous way of thinking)therefore he's going to "trick" them (his logic) to sleep with him by implying that he can still get them pregnant and then gleefully say AHA! when a drove of shady women all turn up all pregnant and pounding down his door.

He's an asshole.

And the only one who is trolling here is him since this story is, I'm sure, completely fabricated to enrage gullible angry men like the ones in this thread.
 
I'm going to stop you right there. He's an asshole because of the line:

Why would he keep it a secret? I'll tell you why. He thinks most women won't sleep with him unless they can get pregnant (sad and ridiculous way of thinking)therefore he's going to "trick" them (his logic) to sleep with him by implying that he can still get them pregnant and then gleefully say AHA! when a drove of shady women all turn up all pregnant and pounding down his door.

He's an asshole.

And the only one who is trolling here is him since this story is, I'm sure, completely fabricated to enrage gullible angry men like the ones in this thread.

Even if the account is fictional, you have nothing to say about the character of women who are perpetrating these kind of acts, while you're ready to call the guy an asshole and scoff at the victim in the OP.

You don't see sexual extortion as an injustice against men?
 
You don't see sexual extortion as an injustice against men?
Women will never see a possibility of any injustice against men. They want equality in the world but still expect us to hold the door for them, be the ones to propose, do all the yard work and be expected to give up our house/kids in the divorce.