Media Manipulation, Trayvon Martin and the NDRP Executive Order

Unarmed Gunman

Medium Pimpin'
May 2, 2007
7,335
287
0
The D
www.googlehammer.com
It is odd that the Trayvon Martin case didn't gain any national attention until 3 weeks after he was shot, but even stranger is that the national media took notice of the old story the same day that Obama signed the NDRP into law.

ZbYEO.jpg


Our media isn't that smart, but perhaps a few key people fed them an old story to deflect unwanted attention away from an executive order that stripped away so many of our rights.

Interesting coincidence, or something more nefarious at work?
 


god damn, they know how to divert the attention to other things, even at the cost of innocent lives!, the NDRP is a very serious thing, and the loss of freedom is even more serious but


Hi - there was a shooting at an Oakland school???
 
fucking conspiracy theorists lol. plenty of videos/new stories go viral long after they happened, doesn't mean shit. is the media manipulated though? of course, everyone knew that.
 
Perhaps Martin was killed in advance with the intent to suppress the story until order is signed?
 
tin_foil_hat.gif





like the media wouldve gave primetime to NDRP.


do this:

go out in the world.
ask people what is NDRP and then ask them who's fucking kim.
??????
Profit


edit:

what's the differecne between this and NSDP51, or REX84, or any other?
 
Interesting coincidence, or something more nefarious at work?

Kind of the million dollar question isn't it. Would be nice if we could see the memo that started this chain of events for once.

ITT: Retards that don't even realize how manipulated they are by the media. You've been trained like a little bitch to marginalize anyone that questions a coincidence.
 
Would be nice if we could see the memo that started this chain of events for once.

The reason the news decided to cover the story was because almost every other person's Facebook status was something about Trayvon Martin. It really got to the point where it couldn't be ignored by national media.
 
The reason the news decided to cover the story was because almost every other person's Facebook status was something about Trayvon Martin. It really got to the point where it couldn't be ignored by national media.

It's funny because you actually believe that.

Just like how they did extensive coverage of SOPA and PIPA after the world protested.


lol.
 
You've been trained like a little bitch to marginalize anyone that questions a coincidence.
Horizontal social pressure keeps us from moving intellect and morality to a higher level.

It's why almost all great thinkers are loners.
 
For those doubting a conspiracy, let's look at what we can all agree on.

NDAA was completely fucked up and snatched away many of our rights (I agree guerilla, but for now let's go with the commonly perceived definition). Congress has passed several National Defense Authorization Acts, but they have always been House bills and voted on by Congress. For some reason, Obama felt the need to push the 2012 version into law via Executive Order. Why? Well, many of the provisions contained in it would never have made it through Congress (at least without raising unnecessary attention to it) so he acted as dictator and made them law anyway.

The key here is when it was signed - December 31st. New Years Eve, Saturday night, half the country too drunk to know what's going on and the other half too dumb to care. The last few National Defense Authorization Acts were signed into law weeks into January so there was no deadline, yet he signed an Executive Order into law on a Saturday night when the least amount of people would notice.

Now fast forward to March 16th when he signs the executive order for NDRP into law, the Friday night before St Patrick's Day - the only day that might have more drunk idiots than New Years Eve, not paying attention to whats going on.

I point these two things out simply to see if we can all agree that Obama signed these Executive Orders into law with a very specific goal of avoiding attention as much as possible. I think it's obvious that the administration wanted as little exposure as possible on these two Executive Orders, and I doubt anybody would disagree with that.

So, if we can all agree that the Administration acted in a willful manner to obstruct the public's view of NDAA and NDRP, why is it so hard to believe that they might push a convenient story (albeit a few weeks old) for the tabloid media to clamp onto in order to further distract the attention of the public?

It doesn't need to be some grand conspiracy, like I said 15,000 murders happen every year in this country and plenty more rapes and other violent crimes too. It can't be too hard to find one to use to stir up racial anger in the public. I know we don't want to admit we're easily manipulated but history has proven otherwise time and time again.

tldr; don't look behind the curtain.
 
fucking conspiracy theorists lol. plenty of videos/new stories go viral long after they happened, doesn't mean shit. is the media manipulated though? of course, everyone knew that.

Your post doesn't have anything to do with Nicky Cakes. -rep
 
At what point on that graph did Obomba chime in with his "If I had a son he'd look like Trayvon" bullshit?

(BTW O; would your son have 2 gold front teeth too? LMAO)