Obama betrays America yet again by signing the 'Monsanto Protection Act' into law
- Thread starter contract
- Start date
The article is a little alarmist, in that the actual language of the law is lighter than the heavy handed interpretation taken liberally by the journalist. Nevertheless I give it 15 years before gardening and eating the fruit of your own labor is made illegal.
.
Yeah like Fast Food chains are using 100% natural food products, fat is killing more people than this shit ever will.
You know the government has gone full corrupt when new laws are litterally named after the companies they are out to provide unfair advantages to.
They don't even bother to hide it in some innocent sounding law like:
The Improvement of America's Agriculture Act
or
Food Security for Children of America Act
Seriously, they are caring less and less about their image. That is dangerous. Eventually, the only thing keeping them in power will be force; no more popular consensus. When they no longer need to show false appearances to maintain power, they will be just like any other totalitarian state.
They don't even bother to hide it in some innocent sounding law like:
The Improvement of America's Agriculture Act
or
Food Security for Children of America Act
Seriously, they are caring less and less about their image. That is dangerous. Eventually, the only thing keeping them in power will be force; no more popular consensus. When they no longer need to show false appearances to maintain power, they will be just like any other totalitarian state.
You know it's not ACTUALLY called 'Monsanto Protection Act' right? :stonedsmilie:
Actually that is what they did. They slipped it in the resolution that was supposedly needed to prevent the government from shutting down.
As usual, many people are focusing only on Obama, but this passed congress first, and republicans still have a majority in the house.
Democrat Brand Management 101: Always blame the Republicans.
Among the most amazing success stories of the 21st Century.
Hello friends,
Politician will always help rich because they to are rich and have lot rich friend and family.
When politician say want help poor it only because they want poor to help them gain power.
Good luck bro
Politician will always help rich because they to are rich and have lot rich friend and family.
When politician say want help poor it only because they want poor to help them gain power.
Good luck bro
Hardly fixed. And if it's possible, for a solitary thread, to not equate the two parties as the same thing. Because talking about a rotten apple doesn't necessarily explain away a rotten orange.
"Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations."
-George Orwell
95% of self-identified journalists are members of the Democratic party. To even casual observers, this should be self-evident.
And when an issue, like this one that directly effects millions of people's lives, is ignored because of the alignment of party affiliations, then the media has failed to do its job. There will be zero public soul searching on this.
Now, back to gay marriage and jaded libertarian stances. (Or just gay stances!)
