Obama: "If You've Got A Business - You Didn't Build That."

Life expectancy and infant mortality rates don't really mean anything.

Well, talking specifically of advanced democracies (which the video I linked is about), I think they mean a great deal. Neither of those things is likely to imply a poor quality of life in those places.

Would you rather live to the age of 6 and starve to death, or die of cholera as an infant?

How about, live a life where I receive adequate food and medical care?

I think I'd rather die at a young age, than grow up and suffer endlessly.

Me too, but I'd rather have a fair chance at a decent life.
 


Your truth or my truth? Truth is as subject to debate as anything.

Some piece of shit claiming truth is up for debate doesnt make truth up for debate. truth is the opposite of up for debate. its final, it will never change and it has been truth long before some dipshit could talk philosophical bs about it.

youd surely agree that 2 plus 2 is four. any 8 year old could verify that fact on his own.

the conservation of energy is postulated. we arent able to verify it. but the answer to the question, whether energy is conserved, is a universal truth that wont change just because we talk smack about it. if it really was not conserved, then energy would not be conserved and that would be truth. that we think otherwise has no impact on truth. wed just be wrong. its that easy.

in the same manner, keynesianism is wrong, and the amount of government funded "scientists" claiming the opposite doesnt make their claim a iota less wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marketer77
Holy shit does that mean blacks didnt build the first lawn mower, dust pan or ironing board?? Always thought it was the Mexicans . . .
 
luckily those checks and balances would kick in long before wed have drones roaming the sky above our cities or dystopian shit like that

The US definitely is not a good example of how a government ought to behave. I agree. The US has slid ever further into a police state. But why the US and not other advanced democracies, which are all much further to the left politically? I don't know how anyone can claim it's a left vs. right thing.
 
Some piece of shit claiming truth is up for debate doesnt make truth up for debate. truth is the opposite of up for debate. its final, it will never change and it has been truth long before some dipshit could talk philosophical bs about it.

You sure? How do you know you're not just dreaming all this up right now?
 
The US definitely is not a good example of how a government ought to behave. I agree. The US has slid ever further into a police state. But why the US and not other advanced democracies, which are all much further to the left politically? I don't know how anyone can claim it's a left vs. right thing.

1. you dont have a fuckin idea what left and right are

2. unluckily, governments only play by your rules as long as they feel like doing so

3. pointing at norway doesnt make your argument right. theyre a tiny country with gigantic amounts of oil that they can very happily live on. the day norways resources dry up theyll become the bad guy just as much as everyone else.

4. other "advanced democracies" still elect a select few elite fags who cast votes about things they shouldnt even have jurisdiction over, call it the majority vote, and then make life shitty for everyone who might have not been in favor of the majority opinion. seconds later, the majority opinion will be declared truth.
 
Some piece of shit claiming truth is up for debate doesnt make truth up for debate. truth is the opposite of up for debate. its final, it will never change and it has been truth long before some dipshit could talk philosophical bs about it.
What's sad is that he falls into the trap all relativists do.

If truth is subjective, then everything he writes cannot be presented as more than an opinion.

Which makes arguments with him a waste of time, because by his own argument, the things he says are completely subjective and have no foundation in objective reality.

In other words, he admits he cannot prove or substantiate anything he believes, yet he is still arguing as though he has superior facts.

It is hard to take people like this seriously, when they deny facts while insisting their argument is factual.

For those having trouble keeping up, this is like the guy who says, "I always lie."
 
What's sad is that he falls into the trap all relativists do.

If truth is subjective, then everything he writes cannot be presented as as more than an opinion.

Which makes arguments with him a waste of time, because by his own argument, the things he says are completely subjective and have no foundation in objective reality.

i know that it makes no sense but im bored
 
i know that it makes no sense but im bored
This guy is a great time waster then, because he will invest hours into making arguments he doesn't believe in. Then he will cry and scream if you don't give him attention, that you are ignoring his argument, which even he doesn't think is true.

It is absolutely terrifying the amount of hot air produced by people who are incapable of basic logic.
 
It is absolutely terrifying the amount of hot air produced by people who are incapable of basic logic.

terrifying, maybe, but equally entertaining. and you cant deny that it makes you feel kind of superior
 
1. you dont have a fuckin idea what left and right are

Feel free to enlighten me.

2. unluckily, governments only play by your rules as long as they feel like doing so

They seem to be doing okay so far.

3. pointing at norway doesnt make your argument right. theyre a tiny country with gigantic amounts of oil that they can very happily live on. the day norways resources dry up theyll become the bad guy just as much as everyone else.

I never singled out Norway, or any other single country to support my argument.

4. other "advanced democracies" still elect a select few elite fags who cast votes about things they shouldnt even have jurisdiction over, call it the majority vote, and then make life shitty for everyone who might have not been in favor of the majority opinion. seconds later, the majority opinion will be declared truth.

I'm sure they appreciate your concern. It's interesting how right-libertarianism is almost exclusively an American phenomenon.

Nevertheless, at some point you have to come to some agreement about what rules to live by if you want to coexist peacefully. Even if it's just deciding what theory of property to adopt. Invariably, someone won't be happy with that.
 
Love this new Obama meme.

jQYtbPXPK5NWo.jpg
 
did you bother to listen to his whole statement? you dont make him look dumb, you make yourself look dumb. if you dont like black people, or you want to have sex with obama and it bothers you admit that and spare us your stupidity. do you really think a majority of voters want to trust the country in the hands of inbreds like yourself?
 
enlighten me. you come across as drunk or extremely angry btw. yunamecall?

whats there to enlighten you about? 2+2 is 4. you know that. making that problem arbitrarily more difficult is kind of silly, but we can go there if you want. did i namecall you?