Pure Coincidence, but I'm Surprised it took Five Years to Happen...
- Thread starter tangy
- Start date
LOL. Either this is a joke, or this is a super shitty "guru" that is either:
a) retarded; or
b) really strong on ethics and not lying
a) retarded; or
b) really strong on ethics and not lying
Damn, really? On WickedFire? Didn't think I'd see this shit. Hope Jon is making bank off this faggot though.. But this is WICKEDFIRES REP WERE TALKIN ABOUT!
LOL. Either this is a joke, or this is a super shitty "guru" that is either:
a) retarded; or
b) really strong on ethics and not lying
LOL
You also forgot the refunds.
Another chuckle to be had at the "pending" column, which has another 1,000$ in Comissions, at 1,997$ cost.
For the tools, here is a sing along:
Revenue
+51704.78
+1000
--------
+52704.78
Cost
-148286.79
-1997
-235.20
---------
-150518.99
Profit
-------
Revenue - Cost
+52704.78
-150518.99
----------
- 97814.21
- 97814.21
- 97814.21
- 97814.21
Per day?
Basic math. Learn it. Love it! Use it!
::emp::
Last edited:
im going to teach YOU how to get rich telling OTHER PEOPLE the secret to getting rich, which is SELLING PEOPLE the hidden SECRET TO GETTING RICH so they can sell OTHER PEOPLE this one little thing THAT WILL MAKE THEM RICH!!!!!!!
Don't want to somehow legitimise these amazing screenshots, but haven't you got it arse about tit? Surely it's the poorly worded control panel and it's $51,704.78 commissions earned from $148,286.79 in sales?
It is very much the affiliate program to end all affiliate programs after all. Straight out of 1998 and you pay to be allowed to make sales one suspects.
It is very much the affiliate program to end all affiliate programs after all. Straight out of 1998 and you pay to be allowed to make sales one suspects.
but what if i told you...
that maybe the cost of sales column is actually the revenue generated by his world class method and commissions are what he's claiming to have pocketed based off the revenue generated? would you believe me, peasants?
that maybe the cost of sales column is actually the revenue generated by his world class method and commissions are what he's claiming to have pocketed based off the revenue generated? would you believe me, peasants?
This message brought to you by Inner Circle Riches™
c) total cost of sales = revenue generated by the affiliate
Duh, never promoted a straight sale product?
im inspired. for a one time fee of $300, ill show anyone how to do this to your paypal account without photoshop, simply with an internet connection, paypal account and browser.
but what if i told you...
that maybe the cost of sales column is actually the revenue generated by his world class method and commissions are what he's claiming to have pocketed based off the revenue generated? would you believe me, peasants?
This message brought to you by Inner Circle Riches™
You beat me to it. That's exactly what it is.
I LOL at those thinking they had found something.
Unless there are deposit fee adjuments in a row underneath (which could be, I have not promoted anything using this stat backend) these guys like to pay very odd commission % or CPA.
Under approved he is either getting:
34.868096% Revenue Share
or
$1034.0956 CPA
And then under pending he is getting:
An increase to 50.075113% Rev Share
or they lowered his CPA to $1k.
ITT: If you doctor commission screenshots; make sure the # fit together. It was pretty bad already claiming a 22.9% conversion rate + almost $3k avg sale + a refund of two hundred some odd on a campaign with avg sale of $3k (some of these stats could happen alone, but all together?)
Under approved he is either getting:
34.868096% Revenue Share
or
$1034.0956 CPA
And then under pending he is getting:
An increase to 50.075113% Rev Share
or they lowered his CPA to $1k.
ITT: If you doctor commission screenshots; make sure the # fit together. It was pretty bad already claiming a 22.9% conversion rate + almost $3k avg sale + a refund of two hundred some odd on a campaign with avg sale of $3k (some of these stats could happen alone, but all together?)
Guys I'm not sure but I think this might be not right...I mean I don't want to say "THIS IS OBVIOUSLY A FUCKING SCAM" or anything but you know...I'm just skeptical a little bit..
I think this is similar to why Nigerian scams use poor grammar on purpose. From the advertiser's perspective, the people who would take the time to do all the math are probably the exact type of people you wouldn't want signing up for a scammy biz op.
Although the more likely reason in this case is that the guy who made the landing page is lazy and can't be bothered to make sure his fake stats could feasibly make sense.
Brilliant.
So, let me get this straight, you click on a thread, don't read or look at any of the posts and then comment without knowing WTF is in the thread?
Quite the contrary, actually.
I have been following this thread from the beginning.
Original point was that Wafo Banners are running on WF, that kind of shit isn't what this place is about, etc.
Then, people start ripping apart the LP, showing stats included in sales pitch are faulty, etc...
Yea, the LP looks stupid, the numbers don't really add up, etc.
Looks like a massive fail.
But, one thing I have learned is that looks can be deceiving, and some of the dumbest shit can convert the best. I know this, because I have made some really dumb shit, and while they haven't been my best performers, they can still turn a profit.
I think we can all agree that we have people with varying levels of intelligence here, and not everyone who visits here registers or posts either. So, there are probably quite a few unregistered visitors here that would fall for shit like that.
Is it really that unfathomable that if the person running that campaign maybe turned a profit at WaFo, they would try to run it at a place like WF as well?
If I was running that campaign, I would probably try to do the same thing.
All of the above is unlikely, but I have learned that my assumptions, along with many other peoples assumptions about the performance of a campaign (especially in the make money niche) can be very, very, very wrong, even when everything I know tells me otherwise.
That guy may be killing it...who knows.
At the end of the day, peoples perceptions (especially who aren't the target audience) of a campaign don't really matter, the data and stats do.
That's all, but whatever... maybe I am misinterpreting the point of this thread. Wouldn't be the first time.