Ok, I'm a newb and I have a question:
I remember reading somewhere in the rules about Reviewers Qualifications that they must provide a review within a reasonable amount of time (I think something posted by Jon) in exchange for a review copy.
Can someone tell me what kinda time scale a "reasonable amount of time" would be?
And what happens if the reviewers don't post a review within that time? Should we go back and ask them again them again (read: beg/bug)? Or is some Big Brother watching and we just wait for him/her to action it?
I remember reading somewhere in the rules about Reviewers Qualifications that they must provide a review within a reasonable amount of time (I think something posted by Jon) in exchange for a review copy.
Can someone tell me what kinda time scale a "reasonable amount of time" would be?
And what happens if the reviewers don't post a review within that time? Should we go back and ask them again them again (read: beg/bug)? Or is some Big Brother watching and we just wait for him/her to action it?