RANT::::God Damn Ragheads

amateursurgeon said:
"raghead" is a ridiculous slur that does nothing but sum up to the total and utter moronic ignorance of the person using it.

It's like calling people from the Indian subcontinent "Pakis".

It's Sikhs who are mandated to wear turbans, not Muslims. Some Muslims wear turbans, but it's got more to do with their country of origin than their religion.


As for attacking their families, yeah because tyrannical brutality is a really effective way to stop terrorists. Look how well it worked for the English in Ireland. Or against the Boers in South Africa. Or for the US in Vietnam for that matter.
Click to expand...

No, Muslims wear turbans because Mohammed the prophet wore one when he was alive. The same thing for the beard.

localdominator said:
The sad truth is that if you fundamentally believe that people deserve to die because they do not belong to your religion, it won't matter what is done to "get on your side", "appease", "intimidate", or "retaliate", cause all you will do is keep hating everyone around you.
All I can say is whatever religion tells you that you can kill an innocent child because of who it is born to is completely godless. Doesn't matter what you say. Hell, atheists have more respect for life than that.
Click to expand...

I'm an Atheist and I've become a better person now compared to when I believed in a God.

All religions are hypocrisy at best. God != good. It's just an idea that fulfill certain human needs.
 


clyde said:
No, Muslims wear turbans because Mohammed the prophet wore one when he was alive. The same thing for the beard.



I'm an Atheist and I've become a better person now compared to when I believed in a God.

All religions are hypocrisy at best. God != good. It's just an idea that fulfill certain human needs.
Click to expand...

Religion is like a gun. Both are good if used properly, but can be fatal if used wrong.
 
subigo said:
Oh yeah? You should probably either know what you are talking about or research it before you say anything.

Redneck is an actual word. It has been used been used for almost 200 years as a word for uneducated farm workers from the south:

Redneck | Define Redneck at Dictionary.com
Click to expand...

Hate to point out the obvious, but the very first definition from that link you provided says "an uneducated WHITE farm laborer." And white is a race.

And I don't know who came up w/ the concept that it's impossible for a person of one race not to be racist against his/her own race, but that's total BS. If you're using terms that are meant for only one race, then that's a racist term no matter who's mouth it comes from.
 
GreeLee said:
Hate to point out the obvious, but the very first definition from that link you provided says "an uneducated WHITE farm laborer." And white is a race.

And I don't know who came up w/ the concept that it's impossible for a person of one race not to be racist against his/her own race, but that's total BS. If you're using terms that are meant for only one race, then that's a racist term no matter who's mouth it comes from.
Click to expand...

The same somebody who came up with the concept that's improbable that straight guys have sex with gay guys. Logic, Einstein. It most likely happens (e.g. in the porn industry), but it's improbable.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6OselVRTsM]YouTube - Clerks II (Porch Monkey)[/ame]
 
turbolapp said:
Same for white people (especially white southern people as I am) and redneck. So one more time for the people on the short yellow bus, You cannot be racist against your own race. Perhaps, elitist against a member of your own race, but NOT racist.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure why you think it's not possible to be racist against a member of your own race? If I didn't give someone a job and the only reason was because they were white then that would be racist right?
 
schockergd said:
Dictionary.com is pulling that out of their butts on the history of red neck. The first use of it in the pubic was during the miner union riots in the 30s. All of the people fighting against the mine wore red handkerchiefs around their necks. So, when a nyt reporter was covering the incident, he called them red necks.
Click to expand...

Please see: Frederic Gomes Cassidy & Joan Houston Hall, Dictionary of American Regional English, 2002, p. 531.

kthxbye
 
BluuueJammm said:
I'm not sure why you think it's not possible to be racist against a member of your own race? If I didn't give someone a job and the only reason was because they were white then that would be racist right?
Click to expand...

Only being white is not a valid reason. It's like saying: "I don't like to hire chinese people because they're yellow." There's obviously an underlying reason. Too pale? Too small dick? Can't jump? Can't rap? If your reason is that white people are generally inferior to x people, that would probably be a bit racist. Technically speaking ofc. But pretty damn pointless.

Kind of like Hellblazer calling other people retards.
 
Jokerr said:
Only being white is not a valid reason. It's like saying: "I don't like to hire chinese people because they're yellow." There's obviously an underlying reason. Too pale? Too small dick? Can't jump? Can't rap? If your reason is that white people are generally inferior to x people, that would probably be a bit racist. Technically speaking ofc. But pretty damn pointless.

Kind of like Hellblazer calling other people retards.
Click to expand...

My point was that it is possible to be racist to someone of your own race.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqJDuZIcQ34]YouTube - Saudis in Audis[/ame]
 
onkelmicha said:
yeah swedes are soo much more open minded ;)

Haha... or not

We're the exact same people, the only different is that Norwegian is way hotter language to her chick speak then Swedish.
Click to expand...

Interesting thought. See, to us Norwegians, Swedish sounds cooler. I love the Skåne dialekt, lol. Grass is always greener on the other side I guess.

Oh and, didn't mean to stray off topic here... I gotta say I agree with you on the bombing thing. Even Norway has received threats from extremists groups just because we have a handful of peace-keeping units down in the middle east. This while we're allowing them to build mosques and let them into the country with hardly any background checks on criminals and the like.

I'm a pretty open-minded guy and I'm not principally against any religion or ethnic race. But you're crossing the line when you bite the hand that feeds you just to "prove" some stupid point for a lost cause. I'd say the same if the idiot was catholic, bhuddist, lutheran, or satanist.
 
I know a couple Swedes here at school. They drink the hell out of some coffee.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom