Respected magazine journalist writes for cheap!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Had him write an article for me with some different instructions and he nailed it. Article looks and reads great and is surely worth every dollar.
 


Hi everyone. Just to let you know that I'm back in business and accepting orders at a rate of $3/100 again for a limited time. Bulk discounts, lightning quick turnarounds!
 
Paul's content is superb. Hold his work up next to anything in say Newsweek, Playboy, or any other top tier periodical and you will see for yourself. And NO this is not a paid endorsement.

See for yourself. Place one of his articles on your site and watch your bounce rate. I think you will be pleasantly surprised. :)

His content is geared more towards an authority site. Hell, his content will make a site an authority site. If your looking to build a site out that will stand out in your niche than invest in great content.

BTW Paul. Get in contact with me. I have another idea I want to run past you.
 
Hi Paul;

Can you write informative health articles about diseases? Possible to see some sample that published for health niche?
 
Paid this guy $320 for work over two weeks ago. I heard nothing from him for over a week , filed a dispute and surprise surprise I got a reply that same day. I have been given excuses but as with anything online you have to take them all with a pinch of salt.

I was 100% promised the work for Sunday but nope nothing and no replys to my emails , the same story for Monday and I'm not holding out much hope for today.

Bring on the 6th when the dispute closes so I can get my bloody money back!!
 
I believe a friend of mine worked with "Paul" before. Some time ago now. He delivered late and the content was very good (not $5/100 words good though - I've read the article myself).

The fact that he's back here under a new username simply means that times are tough for him and he needs monies. Happens all the time on WF. I hope you guys get your content and/or money back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.