Ron Paul preparing to endorse Mitt Romney
- Thread starter theunicorn
- Start date
All you've told me here is that the "journalism world" is uniformly full of crap... This is the 3rd derogatory article they've put out about Paul this cycle.
Why would the ONLY Republican Christian left in the race be treated this way?? If anything they should be biased FOR Paul, not against him!
Clearly establishment trolls there. Just like OP.
they are one of the least sensationalistic and unbiased news orgs in the world you half-wit.
if you read widely and didn't just read fantastical crap that confirmed your biases you might have known that.
if you read widely and didn't just read fantastical crap that confirmed your biases you might have known that.
looks like he went of his rocker
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvahywQKeFc]'RON PAUL' - A Bad Lip Reading SoundBite - YouTube[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvahywQKeFc]'RON PAUL' - A Bad Lip Reading SoundBite - YouTube[/ame]
I will expect your official apology around the end of August. I'd advise you STFU until then and stop digging a deeper hole for yourself.
And as for your offer to "find the BIGGEST anal plug I can afford online and shove it up my ass. No lube." -What's the point? We all know you're gay and fuck chickens, surely this activity wouldn't be so out of the usual for you...
so ron is still being evasive when it comes to clearing up the rumors about the romney endorsement.
when he comes out for romney it's going to make the jim jones mass suicide look like amateur hour when the reality of how the paulbots were used by the paul clan can't be denied any more.
when he comes out for romney it's going to make the jim jones mass suicide look like amateur hour when the reality of how the paulbots were used by the paul clan can't be denied any more.
But... but... but... the Christian Science Monitor used words like possibly, may be, and could when talking about Ron Paul endorsing Romney. They surely can't be wrong for having "one of the best, if not the best, reputations in the journalism world".
Forget an apology dude, I will literally do *ANYTHING* you want me to that isn't flat out illegal or very dangerous to my health. And yes I'd put that in writing.
What was derogatory about it?
"We still think it’s likely that Paul senior will just strike a sort of non-aggression pact with the Romney forces that does not include explicit backing. Rand’s endorsement might have been as far as the Paul team is willing to go."
You're reading too much into the name.
Islam and Muslims should not scare you - CSMonitor.com
Written by "Amjad Mahmood Khan, a former editor in chief of the Harvard Human Rights Journal, is an American Muslim attorney in Los Angeles."
There will never be consensus on which major news source is most unbiased, but the CSM is viewed that way by a diverse range of people.
Please digg this EXCELLENT article from the Christian Science Monitor - Ron Paul Forums
"The CSM is a great place (in general)"
"CSM is one of the most unbiased news agencies out there"
Did you also miss the part where he says the most likely thing is that Paul will not officially endorse Romney? Anyways, it's not a news story, it's an opinion column with the writer speculating on what Paul will do, and some of this speculation is based on recent content from Ron's own site.
The CSM syndicates various columns, also. Here's a mises.org one from a few days ago :
He's a fan: One man's defense of Ron Paul - CSMonitor.com
He's a fan: One man's defense of Ron Paul - CSMonitor.com
Maybe we need to get a thread started about this... We could get a poll going and everything... I just wish I had time tonight to do it properly.
Edit: @Moxie: Didn't know they were that big... Good to know. The tone of this particular editorial stinks but I've read far worse so no biggie.
