Rupert Murdoch v Google

Yeah but who is going to pay for News Corp of all content when pretty much EVERYTHING ELSE on the internet is still free?

Really, News Corp's content can barely be called journalism, regardless of your political views. Every major market he's in, the USA, the UK and England all have similar news sites that don't charge for content. Most Fox News readers aren't tea party Glenn Beck fantatics and would be perfectly happy to read CNN instead. The Sun readers can just move over to the Daily Mail, and Fairfax papers in Australia are similar to the News Corp ones.

Currently there are free traditional media alternatives to existing free traditional media news sources, but they all suffer from the same problem, they all perceive that google is deriving more revenue from their content then they are. If the Sun throws up a pay wall and reports positive results (granted thats a big if) then why would the Daily Mail not follow suit? And then eventually there go all the free news outlets if traditional media outlets happen to be your cup of tea.

CNN is unique since they have TV to fall back on for the time being and aren't in as bad shape as most major American papers. But again, if somebody like Murdoch shows that people can be conditioned to pay for news of a certain pedigreed source then they too will follow suit. Why wouldn't they, CNN technically still has a pay wall for their broadcast content in the States... a cable TV subscription.

Then what you have left are blogs, there maybe some good ones out there but some people will never trust them like they trust a source like The Washington Post or WSJ. And you have the Huffington Posts of the world, niche aggregators in the same (non automated) vein as google. And if a paywall goes up the DMCA notices will come out to squash the huffpos.

But it's all armchair quarterbacking until Murdoch actually pulls the trigger.
 


Google would never "shut off" any large company in spite. If the government got wind of that, the first thing they'd try to do is regulate google.

Well, they shut off a couple of my sites in the past.

Guess I need to become "too big to fail" so the government will drop money from helicopters over my house and Google will have to at least contact me before they just delist one of my sites.

Heading to GoDaddy to buy some more domains.
 
Fox news' website has enough followers that they could have both a free section as well as a premium paid section for the hard core fans. I cant see enough people subscribing to electronic versions of the other papers though.

I'm not going to call this guy an idiot - because he's a billionaire and is prolly smarter than me - but pissing off Google, Yahoo and Bing is kind of dangerous. Google could drop all his listings for a month just to show their displeasure - shuttung off all of that traffic could screw up his advertising revenues big time, maybe push some of the daily news sites over the edge even.

People will pay for quality news, so long as it's fresh and unavailable elsewhere for at least a few ours. It just requires the news to go back to waht it used to do, but has been taken over by bloggers: Investigative Journalism.

Crikey.com is the perfect example of this.
They have a number of very well placed moles and leaks in various government and media departments within Australia, and make a good deal of money from their subscribers who want news that simply is unavailable anywhere else until Crikey breaks it.
Other news organisations used to do this. They'd use their resources to get people into various organisations and businesses and expose things. They don't anymore because it was expensive to do, and was one of the first things to go during the economic rationalisation in the 80s.
 
Between paying for quality news or getting it free and getting paid for advertisers on that content, Im guessing the latter is more profitable...so WTF is rupert doin...
I mean Rupert doesnt have a lock on all news ie exclusives right>? So if his sites are for pay, and yahoo news is free....hmm where am I gonna look.
Now, specific and specialized news and content already comes at a price in some circles...look at rivals.com where they charge for sports content etc for the diehards...
but if you look at the general sports news..its free, and for good reason.
Because its generally available content..
 
100k clicks a minute is almost the entire population of the world clicking on your link every month.