Russian warships enter Syrian waters - Is this how WWIII begins?

fuck these guys, they always come off as they are the nice guys and they dont want anything to happen. Yet they are always provoking shit. Thats why we are building missile defenses. They are assholes who always pull stupid shit to flex their muscles like they still are important. Fuck em. Put up the missile defense system and lets see them talk shit. I'd say send warships to syria and see if they wanna back up all that shit they talk.
 


Why would Russia go to war with the West? They make too much money selling oil to us.

It would make no sense for them to do, and Putin isn't stupid.

In the old days, it was about a clash of ideologies. Lenin said that the only way communism could triumph was through violent revolution. Russian isn't communist any more. They'd have nothing to gain by getting into a large-scale conflict.
 
Kiopa_Matt said:
That's not the point. They have alot to lose by sitting idly be, while the US invades and occupies the entire Middle East.
Click to expand...

Which is why they're moving warships there. The point is it's unlikely to escalate into full-scale war, because a large nation like Russia has a too much to lose.

Iran, on the other hand...
 
Kiopa_Matt said:
Russia should go setup some new missile batteries in Mexico, and just say, "no worries, we're only help protecting our allies from Chavez. nothing to see here, move on".
Click to expand...
russia already has rockets capable of carrying warheads in venezuela as part of a space program there.

amateursurgeon said:
Why would Russia go to war with the West? They make too much money selling oil to us.
Click to expand...
i agree. and if there's unrest in the middle east, russia can also charge china more for oil since china's supply will be cut off. with that leverage, russia can demand that china place a trade embargo on the US.
 
amateursurgeon said:
Which is why they're moving warships there. The point is it's unlikely to escalate into full-scale war, because a large nation like Russia has a too much to lose.
Click to expand...

Other way around. Russia has too much to lose by NOT being extremely aggressive towards the US. They have to be aggressive right now, or else within 10 years at the current course, the US will own the entire Middle East. This is their livelihood at stake, just as much as the US'.

The US isn't invading and occupying Middle East countries for shits and giggles. They're doing it because they don't have a choice in the matter, as their survival depends on it. Just like Russia's survival depends on the US not occupying the entire Middle East.
 
jenzkc said:
here's medvedev's televised address. press "cc" for closed captioning:

ЗаÑ�вление о Ñ�итуации вокруг европейÑ�кой ПÐGAYО - YouTube
Click to expand...


I have instructed the Armed Forces to draw up measures for disabling missile defence system data and guidance system if need be.....

If that doesn't work, they will deploy modern offensive weapon systems in the west and south of the country.....

WTF....
 
America/Israel is about attack Iran and Syria, that's why Russia is pissed.

WW3 boys, time to get the fuck out of big cities, if you want to survive of course. Canada North.. here I come..

You need to open your eyes and see who the real aggressor is. Israel/USA/UK/NATO
 
jenzkc said:
russia already has rockets capable of carrying warheads in venezuela as part of a space program there.
Click to expand...

Russia has sub launched ICBMs and cruise missiles. Conversion of space rockets in a short timeframe is pure fantasy. Plus, would you trust chavez with nukes?
 
Russia is too poor to fight a conventional war with the usa lol.. They're still flying their outdated piece of shit soviet bombers.

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/bomber/tu-95h_1.jpg

And there's no way China would ever put a trade embargo on the us. They would completely kill their economy if they did that. Here's what I think is going to happen soon.

1. Israel bombs Iran. I'd bet the USA has planned this careful with them but want to make it seem like the US has absolutely nothing to do with it when Iran's Nuclear sites get attacked.

2. Iran will try to retaliate but won't get far. If they strike us interests we'd cripple their refining capabilities and they'd be fucked. More than likely at that point a regime change would be in order. I'd bet there would also be an uprising since the people would have a better shot at regime change with Israel, US and other support.

3. China and Russia get mad but do nothing

And the reason we were so pissed when the soviets sent nukes to Cuba is cause the fucker wanted to use them on us. When the Russians figured out how fucking retarded Castro was I'm sure they felt the necessity to move them since they'd be mutually annihilated if Cuba did attack us.
 
mattseh said:
Russia has sub launched ICBMs and cruise missiles. Conversion of space rockets in a short timeframe is pure fantasy. Plus, would you trust chavez with nukes?
Click to expand...
well, russia doesn't have any reason not to trust him.

anyways, thought it was venezuela, but it's french guiana.

hgMPY.jpg
 
It's funny I was just googling "US vs Russian Military Comparison" and I came across this yahoo answer which I find fantastic... (someone asked who would win a war between the US/Russia)

Best Answer:

Well - there are three answers to this question.

1) The USA is better equipped, trained, motivated, fed and led. Short term war - US wins.
2) The Russians have more nuclear weapons. Nuclear war - no-one wins, but more of US is destroyed.
3) The US public would never stomach a war of attrition - the Russian public have, and would again if it came down to it. Long term non-nuclear war - the US would have to break off because the public would be sickened by the carnage and the deaths of its young men.

source: Who is stronger usa vs russia military? - Yahoo! Answers
 
Andrey said:
America/Israel is about attack Iran and Syria, that's why Russia is pissed.

WW3 boys, time to get the fuck out of big cities, if you want to survive of course. Canada North.. here I come..

You need to open your eyes and see who the real aggressor is. Israel/USA/UK/NATO
Click to expand...


This. All the more reason to get Paul in for 2012.

Fundamentalist Christians want WW3 to start, because it will fulfil their nonsense about the Rapture.
 
avatar33 said:
It's funny I was just googling "US vs Russian Military Comparison" and I came across this yahoo answer which I find fantastic... (someone asked who would win a war between the US/Russia)

Best Answer:

Well - there are three answers to this question.

1) The USA is better equipped, trained, motivated, fed and led. Short term war - US wins.
2) The Russians have more nuclear weapons. Nuclear war - no-one wins, but more of US is destroyed.
3) The US public would never stomach a war of attrition - the Russian public have, and would again if it came down to it. Long term non-nuclear war - the US would have to break off because the public would be sickened by the carnage and the deaths of its young men.

source: Who is stronger usa vs russia military? - Yahoo! Answers
Click to expand...


Damn, I can't argue with a source so authoritative! :bowdown:
 
We have literally become the Nazis in WWII, invading countries and pissing everyone off.
 
We have nothing to fear from civilized countries. Everyone is aware of what would happen in a full-scale nuclear war.

If those fag Muslimatoes get their hands on a nuke - that's the only way a WW3 would start. If someone was stupid, and unreasonable enough to begin it. Like the dumb Christians, "the guy in the sky/very old book told me to do it" is a fail-safe arguement for them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom