Scammers Arb Page

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PSU4Life

New member
Aug 10, 2006
306
4
0
When doing arb research I came across an arb page on 7 search that was done by the scammer, exposed here http://www.wickedfire.com/shooting-shit/10366-piece-shit-forum-spammer-here.html

The Arb page is Dildo lover and he seems to be on to something since he is bidding .13 for purse when the next closest site is .06. I was surprised he is able to stay profitable while bidding .13 since I tried the purse niche on 7 search months ago and had to ditch it. The ads showing on his page are different from mine which I'm assuming is why he is able to be profitable.

It looks like he is able to target higher paying adds by listing a ton of URLS related to purses with some text. But he uses the
<!-- google_ad_section_start --> and <!-- google_ad_section_end --> to auto targe the URLs/content but then does some script so all the content doesn't show on the page.

Can anyone explain what is going on here by looking at the source code. Clearly having no content is against TOS but I think whatever he is doing to target the ads to pay higher might be of help for our arb sites.
 


I edited the link to his site with a more suitable keyword. If he's going to pick up rank from here, he may as well get a keyword for a product he uses often on himself.
 
I don't think Anal Bead Lover is doing anything special. Yeah he's using the start/stop content tags but the content is targeted to the keywords he's targeting. How is this different than writing a keyword rich article.

On the other hand he is using links in his hidden content. Google probably gives him more credit for keywords in relevant links. He does appear to be blatantly violating the TOS. Hmmm....

What about this....

Use your normal keyword rich article. But also use his script to hide some relevant links. Or put some relevant links throughout the article but "hide" them with css stripping the decoration and making the same color as the normal text.

Be careful though... Isn't hidden text (using the script) against the google TOS anyway?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom