I think you guys are generalizing waaaay too much. And so what if other people have the tool. Whether it's $500 or $100, you will still have to be smart about how you use it anyway.
sweetfunny said:the only people who are supposed to have this are a couple of Beta testers and the Staff/Execs ... I really wish it wasn't posted until it was officially released and ready but anyhow too late now
So I guess DFB and BB are retarded as well?
Did you see the text he quoted? The person said that if your going to use the same account name on all the forums your spamming then you might as well report yourself to some spam site. DFB uses the same account name on it's blasts.
This thing looks like it would leave footprints all over the place.
Does this support deathbycaptcha? decaptcher eats dick, dbc is cheaper and appears to work better
she needs to get a junior coder to take over all the bug report fixes and focus entirely on captcha cracking. captchas are a bitch and a half to break depending on the platform and type of captcha, she needs to focus.
you will still have to be smart about how you use it anyway.
Did you see the text he quoted? The person said that if your going to use the same account name on all the forums your spamming then you might as well report yourself to some spam site. DFB uses the same account name on it's blasts.
What's the harvester like at the moment? I haven't really mastered hrefer yet and I'd be more than willing to shill out $100 for something that does work out of the box with documentation that isn't russian engrish.
^lol at getting something like this coded for $100. If that was possible, do it and then sell it. Fuckwit. I swear to god I see your dumbass post stupid shit all of the time, just fucking leave already.
What's the harvester like at the moment? I haven't really mastered hrefer yet and I'd be more than willing to shill out $100 for something that does work out of the box with documentation that isn't russian engrish.
scrapebox wasnt anything impressive when it first came out, and look at it now.
If you guys had the $500 to spend, would you still get xrumer over Scrapboard?
I've got Scrapebox and its really easy to use, but from what I've read xrumer is the way to really take things to the next level.
I guess the question is really do you think Scrapboard will in the near future will equal the power of xrumer?
Thanks,
As it sits, xrumer is way more powerful and modifiable.
I have had Xrumer for years now and I wouldn't EVER think about buying Scrapeboard.
As it sits, xrumer is way more powerful and modifiable.
Do you know if xr uses a SQLServer (possibly express) database to store things or is it a different data store? (sorry for the hijack)
Here's the thing - it's immature software, but most likely will become something useful. I believe this is proven by what happened w/Scrapebox. I think everyone can agree that SB is a pretty useful tool. (Come on, you know you love it.)
At $97, ScrapeBoard is a bargain especially considering that one day it will work, and work well. Is it a poor man's Xrumer? Yeah pretty much, that's what it looks like. But then again, Xrumer is a tool that can be used for way more than just forum profile creation. If someone JUST wants to create forum profiles, they can do it for $100 and an easy learning curve now. (As opposed to $500 and a somewhat intimidating learning curve, with Xrumer.)
Xrumer is superior but I think ScrapeBoard has it's merits as well.
If scrapeboard is as good as xrumer. the editor should sell it for the same price as xrumer. Scrapebox always has good support. But xrumer got no support at all.