You do realize that if the current TSA regulations were in effect in 2001, 911 couldn't of happened right?
My guess is the locked reenforced Cockpit door is actually the simplest solution that came out of all of that.
You do realize that if the current TSA regulations were in effect in 2001, 911 couldn't of happened right?
You do realize that if the current TSA regulations were in effect in 2001, 911 couldn't of happened right?
You do realize that if the current TSA regulations were in effect in 2001, 911 couldn't of happened right?
My guess is the locked reenforced Cockpit door is actually the simplest solution that came out of all of that.
Wrong.
I'll be the first to admit I'm not a 9/11 expert but didn't the hijackers use knives which were, at the time, allowed to be brought on the plane?
Without those knives which are now not allowed I assume their plan would of been much harder to pull off.
Gotta give TSA some credit though...
Since they started not one single old lady, old man, little boy, or little girl has blown up a train, bus, or airplane...
Really?Considering no American blew up a bus, train or airplane before they started feeling up US Citizens, I'd say your comment has no merit.
Adam Savage accidently snuck two 12 inch long razor blades onto the plane. 100% by accident. Didn't even have to try.TSA workers miss stuff all the time. Search for news of passengers accidentally carrying knives, box cutters, or guns through security. Search for news about the results of government tests where the TSA fails to find fake bombs and other weapons about 50-75% of the time.
Will Security Measure Up This Holiday Season? - YouTube
You’re missing the boat on terrorism because you’re doing these invasive searches on six-year old girls. Same week that this happened I got a call from another neighbor of mine in Bowling Green, a little boy had a broken foot and crutches. They didn’t want to go through all the screenings, so they took the crutches off and the cast and he wanted to hobble through on his broken foot. His dad was helping him. TSA said “back away, back away.” Then he had to go through the special search because he previously had a cast on, even though the cast went through the belt. When the dad comes close they say “back away, back away.” “If you don’t back away you won’t fly.” This kind of gets back to this whole idea of what are willing to do, what are we willing to give up as a country. In your interview with ABC News, you said “I see flying as a privilege.” There are those of us who see otherwise. The Supreme Court concluded in Saenz vs. Roe in 1999 says that although the word travel is not found in the text in the constitution, yet the constitutional right to travel from one state to another is firmly embedded in our jurisprudence. Justice Stewart went on to say in Shapiro vs. Thompson that the right to travel is so important that it is assertable against private interference as well as governmental action. A virtually unconditional constitutional right guaranteed by the Constitution to us all. This isn’t to say we don’t believe in safety procedures. But I think I feel less safe when you’re doing these invasive exams on a six-year old.
It makes me think you’re clueless, if you think she’s going to attack our country and you’re not doing your research on the people who want to attack our country. It absolutely must involve a risk assessment of those who are traveling. And the fact that she’s being patted down and I don’t feel comfortable really with your response that we are no longer doing random pat-downs. I think you ought to get rid of the random pat-downs. The American public is unhappy with them, they’re unhappy with the invasiveness of them. The Internet is full of jokes about the invasiveness of the pat-down searches and we ought to just consider, is this what we’re willing to do. The other thing is while we’re doing that there are examples of where we’ve had let-downs. When Faisal Shahzad got on the plane, the alleged Times Square bomber, he was on a watch list. Everybody said, “it was the airline that let us down.” Well he had to go through TSA screening. There were 10 hours, we ought to be able to react. Is the TSA looking at flight manifests? Doing background research of people getting on and off the planes? Are we targeting or looking at those who might attack us?
*haveYou do realize that if the current TSA regulations were in effect in 2001, 911 couldn't of happened right?
I'll be the first to admit I'm not a 9/11 expert but didn't the hijackers use knives which were, at the time, allowed to be brought on the plane?
Without those knives which are now not allowed I assume their plan would of been much harder to pull off.
*have
I've dropped turds bigger than a box cutter.
Wow, you really are trolling. Don't wait for me to spell it out.internal turds are allowed on planes, box cutters are not, so who cares?
If they were banned from the get go then they would've used something different to hijack the plane; or came up with a different way to attack us.good catch.
internal turds are allowed on planes, box cutters are not, so who cares? The used to be allowed on planes, then 3,000 people died, now they aren't. If they were banned from the get go....
If they were banned from the get go then they would've used something different to hijack the plane; or came up with a different way to attack us.
Why would he refuse the pat down? He's dealing with the lowest level of TSA, who are just trying to do their job and go home.
Because before 9/11, there was pretty much a plane blown up every week..Then why don't they continue to hijack planes?
I'm seriously not trolling I'm just curious where these thought processes come from.
Multiple planes were hijacked on the same day all with the same method. Since that event, no US planes have been hijacked (let alone multiple in one day). It's said the total cost to pull it off was under half a mil.
If I use your rational then why aren't people continuing to do it via other methods? Especially after we killed Osama? As you said, they would just find another way, but why haven't they?