SEnuke blasts Vs Drip Feed Blasts to web 2.0 site for Local SEO

LegitAM

LegitAM

WF Premium Member
Apr 7, 2010
1,246
4
0
Hey guys, I've got a few clients I'm currently building up keyword/competition research for. I'm also trying to make my plan of attack. Which have you found better results with for Web 2.0/tier 2 sites SEnuke or Drip Feed Blasts?
 


Just backtrace the 2.0 until you get far enough in, and then DFB the shit out of your tier level nukes. Use se1 on your outermost tier. On you're middle tier, go for se2. When you get to your main tier, bust out you're big guns with se3 or maybe even se4 if you're as fuckin legit an AM as I think you are.
 
Gonzo said:
Just backtrace the 2.0 until you get far enough in, and then DFB the shit out of your tier level nukes. Use se1 on your outermost tier. On you're middle tier, go for se2. When you get to your main tier, bust out you're big guns with se3 or maybe even se4 if you're as fuckin legit an AM as I think you are.
Click to expand...

Yes couldn't agree more, I would also make sure that I have ninja optimized the first level tiers as well. Just to get that extra juice flowing from SE1
 
SENuke suck's ass. Drip Feed Blasts suck ass. Web 2.0 links suck ass. Blog Comments work. Private blog networks work. Exact Match domains kill.
 
No No No... Don't use any of those. Haven't you heard of the new se69? Once you think you have it licked you are ass backwards.

Seriously though...

Use both SENuke and the Drip Feeds - do it in a tiered/layered approach. Make sure your layer 1 links pointing to your money site are quality legit links. I would then run crappier/spammy links to the layer 1 links. You can keep "layering" it like that over and over and over. Just blast the shit out of your layer 2+ links.

Brian
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom