The Height of US Hipocracy

lukep

He Hath Arisen
Sep 18, 2010
7,687
207
0
On the blockchain
Holy shit, hod on to your ass for this one guys... And call the sherrif while you're at it!

Here's a list of important people in the past and present US government who accepted large sums of money to Advocate the MEK, Iran's opposition party and according to DHS & the State Department, a Designated terror group: (Look at #29 on that list.)

Rudy Giuliani (Yeah, you know this dipshit. Not surprised he's paid by terrorists.) ;)
Tom Ridge (Yes, the first director of the DHS!)
Michael Hayden (Former director of the NSA and CIA both!)
Louis Freeh (Former director of the FBI)
Gov Bill Richardson
Gen Wesley Clark
Howard Dean
Michael Mukasey
Ed Rendell (Even speaks advocates the MEK on MSNBC!)
Andy Card
Lee Hamilton
John Bolton (UN Ambassador)
Fran Townsend

They all received something like $20k to $45k or more to speak in front of European Audiences, some several times, IN SUPPORT OF the MEK. They do not even deny this.

According to the Supreme Court, specifically in Holder v. Humanitarian Law, which upheld the Obomba administration's DOJ statute; the providing of “material support” (which includes ADVOCACY in that court case) to groups formally designated by the State Department as Terrorist organizations is a FELONY, to be punished by PRISON TIME.

So that entire list above have all committed felonious crimes against the US and need to report to their nearest police station at once!

Oh, but it gets even better...

See that last name on the list, Fran? That whore has been caught on both sides of this issue.

The court case Holder v. Humanitarian Law was a blow to the constitution, as are most supreme court cases I hear about lately. It basically criminalized speaking up -anywhere at all- for a terrorist group. As in right now if you stated on WF that the MEK was right to commit jihad against somebody, then people in black helicopters can show up and cart your ass away on this felony charge.

The day Holder v. Humanitarian Law was settled, Fran Townsend went on CNN with Wolf Blitzer and heralded it's awesomeness. She said the decision was “a tremendous win for not only the United States but for the current administration.”

So the same law that she beamed about is now supposed to take her sweet ass down.

Naturally, someone fine Libertarians pointed that out to her on her Twitter page... Look at her response:

townsend.png


Jesus. She just used the constitution as a shield from her crime.

So what do you clowns think? Will Obomba swoop in and arrest these fine, upstanding, terrorist sympathizers? :uhoh2:



Sauce: Washington's high-powered terrorist supporters - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com

(That's the most provocative read in a long time. Can't wait to see camp Obomba's official response!)
 


the story will disappear and no charges will ever be filed. I'd be amazed if it got 1 min of air time across every major news network.
 
So which one of you is "Vengeful Librarian?"


This shit really irks me... We spend so much time defending the pureness of the constitution, and these fuckers RAPE it and then immediately HIDE BEHIND IT all in one fail swoop.

Every lover of the constitution should be up in arms about this; guns in hand, ready to apprehend these terrorist lovers right now with a citizen's arrest...

Perhaps the Paul camp could shine a light their way?
 
So which one of you is "Vengeful Librarian?"


This shit really irks me... We spend so much time defending the pureness of the constitution, and these fuckers RAPE it and then immediately HIDE BEHIND IT all in one fail swoop.

Every lover of the constitution should be up in arms about this; guns in hand, ready to apprehend these terrorist lovers right now with a citizen's arrest...

Perhaps the Paul camp could shine a light their way?

Welcome to being a nationalist luke. You care about your country, so again - welcome. Shes a scumbag, as are most of those in our government. If anyone thinks that we're fighting these people to fight terrorism, those people are stupid - gullible and will believe anything the Zionist occupied government will tell them.. Propaganda's a bitch.
 
why the hell would you prevent anyone from speaking their mind, what is the danger in that? let them talk about terrorist organizations all they like.

limiting the freedom of speech is something that no one should agree to, especially when it is the exchange of ideas.

and did all those politicians get money to talk on behalf of something they do not believe in? must have a pretty difficult thing for them.
 
Agreed, but dude, isn't he a big liberal? I guess truth is truth tho...

Anyone think this shit could wind up in any arrests?

He's liberal on some fronts, but at least he calls out the hypocrisy of the supposed liberal democrats that act like neo-cons.