They can do this in England because the citizens are unarmed!
- Thread starter oogie1947
- Start date
- Status
wn firearms?
This is how the Muslim women in full head to toe garbs eat:
(Sorry no embed allowed here)
YouTube - Spaghetti-eating mashup. Lady & The Tramp Style!
(Sorry no embed allowed here)
YouTube - Spaghetti-eating mashup. Lady & The Tramp Style!
Wow. That's pathetic, especially after all of the "islam is a peaceful religion" talk on CNN, etc.
Although, that may just be a small sect - but still, they got the publicity alright.
Although, that may just be a small sect - but still, they got the publicity alright.
I don't like it but it's freedom of speech... don't you have it where you are?? And how would being armed stop this?
Can't remember who said it but the perfect quote...
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
I'd rather have a bunch of extremist Muslims waving placards outside my door than a bunch of other extremists waving guns.
Can't remember who said it but the perfect quote...
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
I'd rather have a bunch of extremist Muslims waving placards outside my door than a bunch of other extremists waving guns.
This is all you Liberals fault! Stop undermining the West, and China, Russia and India (and Japan and maybe Brazil).
These are the only countries that really matter.
Wake up to the Islamic threat
Like the communist threat eh? That was a good one too. Or do you still think that if our governments hadn't given half our taxes to arms manufacturers then the USSR would rule the world?
Not to mention the countless killed fighting the last "ism"... Vietnam is doing ok now though, despite the best attempts of the last lot of war-mongers.
Last edited:
Then again, another country didnt try to overrun their country and rule them unjustly and by force hundreds of years ago. That tends to make ya a little biased.
(I am referring to Europe trying to control us before we revolted and became the USA. And, in that revolt, we realized the importance of having a right to arm oneself to prevent against that shit in the future.)
(I am referring to Europe trying to control us before we revolted and became the USA. And, in that revolt, we realized the importance of having a right to arm oneself to prevent against that shit in the future.)
If they did that in America it would be stopped because we have lots of guns. There's plenty of people who would shoot radical muslims.
Personally I would rather have some extremists waving guns, they might kill a few people, but the police will take them out sooner or later. Whereas the extreme Muslims waving placards will blow a building up with a bomb and kill a few thousand later on.
Thomas Jefferson said that quote btw.
WTF... the attempts to overrun the USA were (relatively) not long after Europeans succeeded in invading and colonising the Americas - much to the detriment of the true native population.
If a national psyche is to be affected by history then how far back do you go? Can America be biased based on the war of independence (which was relatively shortly after colonisation)? Do the Roman, Viking or Norman invasions of Britain still affect us here? (Rhetorical questions I guess.. I don't know.)
I'm a bit pissed (that's pissed drunk, not pissed angry) so might not be making much sense, but you have definitely got it wrong:
"Europe trying to control us before we revolted and became the USA."
Without Europe the native people might still have their own country. The "us" you refer to are people of European descent aren't they?
The more significant thing was invading and colonising America in the first place, not trying to control the people we sent there.
(If you are a native American 'Indian', then sorry - it makes more sense.)
Yeah, I heard what happened when some college kids protested about Vietnam. Not dissimilar to the Tianeman Square massacre really. I'd rather not live in a country where protesters get shot. Regardless of whether or not you or I agree with their beliefs, it is wrong to shoot people just because you disagree with what they have to say.
One problem is that I'm sure the people waving the placards are most likely British citizens, if we had the same laws that allowed for various school shootings in the US they would have no problem getting guns and with their views I'm sure they wouldn't have a problem using them either.
Another problem is that innocent people die. Maybe that doesn't bother you, I'm sure if it was your wife, mother, daughter or sister that got shot it would.
Which ever way you look at it there are more violent deaths per capita in countries with relaxed gun laws than there are in countries which restrict gun ownership.
Thomas Jefferson didn't say that quote btw - It was an English writer, paraphrasing a Frenchman. (Had to dig it up as I had it in my head it was someone French.)
Hippy: I wasnt defending or opposing it either way. Im just saying that our government was formed when we revolted from England and, when they formed that government, at the time they were damn sure to write into the constitution some protection against that in the future.
religion is bad in general, period
tens of wars have been started in name of religion, but in most cases it was just a fake motivation to expand territories and such
the weird thing is that these muslims are serious
"europe you'll pay. your 9/11 is on its way" shut that fuck up
I'm sure not all of them, but their mind is different, their education is different, they are different, at least lots of them
freedom of speech is absolutely sacre, but don't ask us not to have a stereotype of you
tens of wars have been started in name of religion, but in most cases it was just a fake motivation to expand territories and such
the weird thing is that these muslims are serious
"europe you'll pay. your 9/11 is on its way" shut that fuck up
I'm sure not all of them, but their mind is different, their education is different, they are different, at least lots of them
freedom of speech is absolutely sacre, but don't ask us not to have a stereotype of you
- Status