To Anybody That Thinks 9/11 was a Conspiracy
- Thread starter SUP3RNOVA
- Start date
Oh no, I totally agree. You've changed my thinking 180 degrees on this.
If Seal Team 6 isn't available, just head to the caves in the Tora Bora region, and look for the guys with the box cutters wearing turbans. They'll get 'er done!
PS. If the US government is so incompetent, how did they manage to recently land a rover on Mars? I don't think the al-Queda's space program is quite up to that level yet though.
Towelheads aren't as unable as your media-molded mind leads you to believe.
/end useless argument
Yes, but they have already faked the moon landing, so probably the mars mission as well, helped pull off the holocaust hoax, UFOs, killed Kenedy and other high profile people Dianna?, let Pearl Harbor happen, etc. Right? lol
Just out of curiosity, do you know about any of the false flag operations in the past? Because it's easy to dismiss everything when you lump it together with faked moon landings, and alien invasions but much harder when you realize that the US has repeatedly and throughout history lied to the public in order to effect policy changes and start wars.
Yes, I have a friend who floods me daily with emails on all this type of stuff, xrepublic.tv, alexanderhiggins, dailybail.com, Rothchilds, NWO, etc, etc. He has first hand experience with corrupt government and great suspicion. I don't believe most of the conspiracies, neither do I believe most of what the government says.
I find it surprising that you give the government enough credibility to pull off moon landings and mars missions. We're talking about politicians and government employees here. :rainfro:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d8MIENVtKw&]Ron Paul - Gulf of Tonkin - YouTube[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sG9TaziF_Q]Jesse Ventura and Judge Napolitano: Operation Northwoods, 9/11, and Wikileaks - YouTube[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8cLyagqPkM]U.S. Apologizes for Medical Experiments - YouTube[/ame]
YO DAWG I HEARD YOU LIKE CONFUSION, SO WE PUT SOME CONFUSION IN YOUR CONFUSION SO WE CAN BE CONFUSED WHILE WE BE CONFUSED
They're two completely different scenarios.
A fully-loaded B-25 weighs about 35,000 lbs. The B-25 was attempting to land when it impacted the Empire State Building, so it wasn't flying at maximum speed. Even if it was, its top speed was ~275 mph. A B-25 has a maximum fuel capacity of 625 gallons (without extended tanks, which I don't believe the Empire State Building one had) and, given that this plane was at the end of its journey, so it definitely wasn't full.
B-25 dimensions:
Wingspan - 67 ft
Length - 53 ft
A fully-loaded Boeing 767-200 has a maximum takeoff weight of 315,000 lbs. It has a fuel capacity of about 16,700 gallons. Both planes were about to fly across the country and both planes impacted the WTC at 500+ mph.
767-200 dimensions:
Wingspan - 156 ft
Length - 159 ft
From a physics standpoint, these impacts are orders of magnitude different. The WTC crashes involve forces that are exponentially more powerful than the B-25 strike, so trying to draw inferences from the Empire State Building incident is fruitless.
Steel loses about sixty percent of its structural integrity at about 1/2 its meting point.
Again, not particularly interested in debating conspiracy theories, more interested in keeping things in perspective.
It's very easy for life to get boring when you work online for yourself. You have to choose to go out and do stuff and live your life.
Or read the opinions of mostly idiots on the internet.