Yes this situation is fucked up, but if you take a step back and look at it from a marketing standpoint (not sure why nobody on this marketing forum has done so) it makes a lot of sense business wise:
Coke sponsored this contest to market to black people. Since a white team won, they can't then use that winner as a marketing tool for their target demo in this situation, so they added a second winner (and paid them all scholarships too). Their marketing campaign was based completely around them being able to have people associating them in their minds with giving scholarships to black students, and they just couldn't do that with no black winning team.
Completely fucked up, but it's pretty obvious, to me anyway, that it wasn't some exec saying "lets let black people have their own thang yall".
I'm curious to know if the judges were young black people, or white men in suits representing Coca Cola, or what. If there were black people on the panel then the crowd can GTFO.
It's very frustrating to be told that because of your race, sex and age you have more opportunities then everyone else then you look in your pockets and find nothing but lint. I see how its easy for people to misdirect that frustration towards the race when they should be directing it at the system that enables it...
So true.
The problem is the media loves racial tension and often reports it in such a way as to turn your average unthinking sheep into a racist (who doesn't think he's racist).
So basically, they don't care about rewarding the best, only rewarding the best black. Cool, why don't we do that in all traditionally 'white' sports now? Only reward the best white - I mean, cmon let us white folks 'have our own thing for once!'
It helps keep the masses focused on each other, rather than the politicians sticking dick to us on a regular basis.