Why consipiracy theorists believe their crazy crap

pixelo

New member
Nov 22, 2010
475
5
0
Interesting article on the mindset and motivations behind conspiracy theorists...

The 9/11 conspiracy theorist who changed his mind - Telegraph

On a June afternoon in the middle of New York’s Times Square, Charlie Veitch took out his phone, turned on the camera and began recording a statement about the 2001 destruction of the World Trade Center.
“I was a real firm believer in the conspiracy that it was a controlled demolition,” he started. “That it was not in any way as the official story explained. But, this universe is truly one of smoke screens, illusions and wrong paths. If you are presented with new evidence, take it on, even if it contradicts what you or your group want to believe. You have to give the truth the greatest respect, and I do.”
To most people, it doesn’t sound like a particularly outrageous statement to make. In fact, the rest of the video was almost banal in its observations; that the destruction of the towers may actually have been caused by the two 767 passenger jets that flew into them. But to those who subscribed to Veitch’s YouTube channel, a channel he set up to promulgate conspiracy theories like the one he was now rejecting, it was tantamount to heresy.
“You sell out piece of s---. Rot in hell, Veitch,” ran one comment beneath the video. “This man is a pawn,” said another. “Your [sic] a f---ing pathetic slave,” shrilled a third. “What got ya? Money?” So runs what passes for debate on the internet. Veitch had expected a few spiteful comments from the so-called “Truth Movement”. What he had not expected was the size or the sheer force of the attack.
In the days after he uploaded his video, entitled No Emotional Attachment to 9/11 Theories, Veitch was disowned by his friends, issued with death threats and falsely accused of child abuse in an email sent to 15,000 of his followers. “I went from being Jesus to the devil,” he says now. “Or maybe Judas. I thought the term ‘Truth Movement’ meant that there’d be some search for truth. I was wrong. I was the new Stalin. The poster boy for a mad movement.”

Read the rest
 


Since lukep is not here..


"Finally, when it was shown to him that the towers didn’t, in fact, collapse in a manner consistent with a controlled explosion,"


No mention of building 7?

WTC7Compare.gif


neverforgetwtc7lt5.gif



As for mindset, the guy in the article would appear to have the psychological issue of tending to only be able to view things in terms of black or white. Instead of just being suspicious about certain aspects, he became sure of something or another, and took to the streets with a megaphone. Now after spending just a few hours with some different people, he went to the other end of the spectrum. Black became white in his brain just like that, completely ignoring even the potential for shades of grey.


I wonder how many articles The Telegraph has done on the controversies surrounding the 9/11 Commission?

"For more than two years after the attacks, officials with North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) provided inaccurate information..

Former FBI director Louis Freeh criticized the 9/11 Commission for ignoring key evidence from Able Danger..

The two co-chairs of the Commission, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, believe that the government established the Commission in a way that ensured that it would fail.."


Criticism of the 9/11 Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon - The Washington Post


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtQY4u8gHTo]9/11 Commission deals - YouTube[/ame]
 
Charlie Veitch the disinfo agent


Suggest you read
Greg Hallet - Hitler was a british agent




if you are gonna fool the sheeple you better be good at it (and they are)


all about mind games from now on

ask the question where the answers in the question


"There exists in this country a plot to enslave every man woman and child. Before I leave this high and noble office, I intend to expose this plot."-President John F. Kennedy -7 days before he was assassinated.
 
911 truthers, jews controlling the world, new world order, moonlandings being fake. false flags, religion, global warming. Its all a load of shit. Arguing with these people is a total waste of time.
 
Nothing wrong with questioning 9/11 or some of this stuff, but when you start on that reptillian shapeshifting shit, chemtrails, Sandy Hook was an inside job, Boston Marathon crisis actors/fake blood your're a fucking schizophrenic nut.
 
Where do you draw the line between what is questionable and what isn't?

When you think the government is behind every major event your'e a loon.

You know who they are...the infowars sheep. The ones waiting on alex jones to feed them the next conspiracy :1bluewinky:
 
I think it is possible to be very skeptical without creating complex theories.

In fact, I'd argue that we need to be very skeptical. There is a lot of bullshit accepted as common wisdom.

That said, I've got a serious allergy to complex theories, and the more complex the theory (or conspiracy theory) the less likely I am to subscribe to it.
 
Conspiracy Theorists believe the stupid shit they do because it means they go against the grain, talk loudly and quickly to overwhelm any counterarguments (or use large, varying fonts as in this thread already), and pretend that they somehow have outsmarted the rest of the world and figured out something no one else saw.

I used to be a 9/11 conspiracy theorist, but then again, I used to be 15 years old. Then I grew up and moved on.
 
Does anyone still believe the North Vietnamese attacked US ships in the Gulf of Tonkin?

Does anyone not believe the US Government conspired to intentionally infect 400 black males with syphilis in the Tuskeegee Experiment?

Does anyone not believe the CIA conspired on mind control experiments on humans in the 1950's as part of Project MK-Ultra?

Does anyone not believe that the FBI conspired to infiltrate communist/socialist and civil rights organizations in the 1960's as part of a program called COINTELPRO?

Does anyone not believe that the US Government conspired to illegally sell weapons to Iran in order to use the proceeds to fund anti-communist guerillas for their fight against the Sandinistas in Nicaragua?

I could go on, but these are just a handful of the "far out crazy nutjob conspiracy theories" that turned out to be 100% true.

Most conspiracy theories are of course false, just because there are so many of them. And it probably helps that the DoD has admitted they have an actual department in their psyops division dedicated to making up lots of crazy conspiracy theories and putting out false info on anything of importance in order to muddy the waters.

But don't for one second forget that anytime a group of people get together in secret to plan something it is by definition, a conspiracy. Just because some of the theories floated to explain the conspiracies are wrong, doesn't in any way negate the presence of a conspiracy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slayerment
false flags

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag

Everyone’s Talking about “False Flags … Isn’t that Another Bogus Historical Conspiracy Theory? | Washington's Blog

"The bottom line is that governments from around the world have – according to their own admissions – carried out false flags.

Any discussion about a specific terrorist attack cannot start with the assumption that it couldn’t be a false flag attack, or that it must be a false flag attack.

The facts of each attack must be examined on their own merits before reaching any conclusion."
 
When I want to feel secure about my beliefs, I lump all opposing beliefs, rational and irrational, into one big group and give it a name.

It makes me feel warm, fuzzy and secure. It also allows me to feel superior over the alien other.

Let's talk about the 'wobuzus'. Those are the real bad guys. Everyone who is slightly different than me or holds ideas that might challenge my notions of reality fit into that group.