WickedFire now Officially NSFW?

[turbolapp]

WF is not the same place it was when those rules were made 5 or 6 years ago. (For better or worse) You just gotta go with the flow because it will swing back the otherway eventually. Things play out, get old and everyone moves on. If there's huge public support for keeping this stuff in the STS and NSFW, I really don't have a problem enforcing it. But it doesn't seem like there is, yet.

You should pretty much know, however, not to look at wf at work or with kids around.

 

[Dankface]

The better question is, when are most of you guys going to grow up? I know many of you are 30 year old neckbeards that never leave the house, but RedTube is just a tab away. Getting (fauxly) excited when you see tits or boobs posted like you're a 12 year old from the Romney household just makes you a retard.

 

[kamired2]

Can you guys please unban yousif so i can enjoy some more drama instead of this faggotry?

 

[adionline]

I agree. It makes me feel like I am on a forum with a bunch of dudes who have probably never touched a pair of real tits in their life. I have recently had to disable images on this forum since I am in environments where I can't have tits and dicks popping up on my screen randomly. Shit gets old fast.

 

[DocApocalypto]

WF is not the same place it was when those rules were made 5 or 6 years ago. (For better or worse) You just gotta go with the flow because it will swing back the otherway eventually. Things play out, get old and everyone moves on. If there's huge public support for keeping this stuff in the STS and NSFW, I really don't have a problem enforcing it. But it doesn't seem like there is, yet.

You should pretty much know, however, not to look at wf at work or with kids around.

but wasn't segregating the boobies so that it wouldn't be NSFW the whole point of the rules?

if you look at the numbers, most people here are just fucking around in STS. do we really want to drive away people with actual jobs from being on the more serious sections and posting good content? what are we left with then?

it seems like Mods should just enforce the rules instead of just saying tough suddenly titties.

 

[kingofsp]

I think it's safe to say all of us men (and some women) enjoy looking at beautiful naked women, despite how many beautiful naked women we may or may not encounter IRL.

Jobs/Wives/Kids are the only things I can see preventing you from enjoying them in the middle of a case study (or similar non-STS thread). If you are letting them compromise the things you love, then you are not truly free.

God bless America.

 

[Dwight Schrute]

The better question is, when are most of you guys going to grow up? I know many of you are 30 year old neckbeards that never leave the house, but RedTube is just a tab away. Getting (fauxly) excited when you see tits or boobs posted like you're a 12 year old from the Romney household just makes you a retard.

 

[lose lose win]

The better question is, when are most of you guys going to grow up? I know many of you are 30 year old neckbeards that never leave the house, but RedTube is just a tab away. Getting (fauxly) excited when you see tits or boobs posted like you're a 12 year old from the Romney household just makes you a retard.

I agree. It makes me feel like I am on a forum with a bunch of dudes who have probably never touched a pair of real tits in their life. I have recently had to disable images on this forum since I am in environments where I can't have tits and dicks popping up on my screen randomly. Shit gets old fast.

This truly is a gay webmaster forum.

 

[hakkairu]

Honestly for me its not about being nsfw. i am content with sts. But bringing nudity into the other subforums? It shows how posters would rather totally trash a decent thread by looking up a nude image for about a minute just to change what the actual topic was about. I know dickrolling/nudity to a noob could be justified. But i've seen in to the extent where its just for jokes outside sts. How is one supposed to take the rest of the forum seriously?

 

[1yerrot]

I'm sure this won't be a popular position among our teenage (and teen minded adults) who clearly never get to see nudity outside of the internet...

But I was just wondering, are the forum rules (11 &12) no longer relevant? Because we now have accounts like SuddenlyTits and SuddenlyAss that post noodies outside of good ole STS kinda making the whole site NSFW or, more importantly to me, not safe for viewing in a family friendly environment (I got kidz mang!).

When I'm reading a case study or other IM related thread I'm not looking for tits. Sorry for disappoint... I thought that's what Shooting The Shit was for?

So yeah, if it's changed just let us know. If not, what other rules can we break just cause we feel like it?

Totally agree.

 

[Jeeta]

hide yo kids hide yo wife = solution

 

[1yerrot]

While it doesn't really apply to me, I can understand the OP's point. If there's a rule that says NSFW stuff needs to stay in STS, but SuddenlyTits & SuddenlyAss is allowed to deviate from the rules, what's to stop everyone else from doing it too. Next thing you know you have to block dozens of people.

We all like to see us some tiddays, but I know a lot of guys use this forum in a work environment that might not be so accepting of nudity.

If it's going to be a forum rule, enforce it and keep the boobs in the STS section. If not, take it off the rule page so everyone knows what to expect. Just keep it consistent is all.

EXACTLY, I love tig-ol-bittys as much or more than the next guy, half of you are filled with estrogen-filled puss boys anyway, but keep the ta tas in a designated section. This aint a porn site (yet)...

 

[NickRac]

I'm sure this won't be a popular position among our teenage (and teen minded adults) who clearly never get to see nudity outside of the internet...

But I was just wondering, are the forum rules (11 &12) no longer relevant? Because we now have accounts like SuddenlyTits and SuddenlyAss that post noodies outside of good ole STS kinda making the whole site NSFW or, more importantly to me, not safe for viewing in a family friendly environment (I got kidz mang!).

When I'm reading a case study or other IM related thread I'm not looking for tits. Sorry for disappoint... I thought that's what Shooting The Shit was for?

So yeah, if it's changed just let us know. If not, what other rules can we break just cause we feel like it?

- rep

 

[1yerrot]

WF is not the same place it was when those rules were made 5 or 6 years ago. (For better or worse) You just gotta go with the flow because it will swing back the otherway eventually. Things play out, get old and everyone moves on. If there's huge public support for keeping this stuff in the STS and NSFW, I really don't have a problem enforcing it. But it doesn't seem like there is, yet.

You should pretty much know, however, not to look at wf at work or with kids around.

Well can we get a rundown on which "rules" are actually rules and which ones are there simply for our reading pleasure?

 

[suddenly_cock]

 

[aproxaday]

Definitely agree. The tits and ass needs to stay in the designated section. I turn off images when i'm on WF at school or whatnot, but I'm sure I'm missing some images that aren't all adult.

 

[Insomniac]

I started reading this thread, got bored, then scrolled down to see some tits or ass. I was disappointed

 

[faceblogger]

I think suddenly_cock is Rainn Wilson

 

[1yerrot]

Seriously, this suddenly_cock faggot has to go... I know this is a homosexual webmaster forum and all, but enough is enough.

 

[ly2 from WF]

suddenly cock is turbo

turbo is suddenly cock