WikiPOST CANNON 1000+live Wikiposts-in-content links-+Sceret sauce- $18- Free Copies

Status
Not open for further replies.
found a way to make it happen. order placed. #19749***18476476

I'm putting *** to prevent public identification
 


wizzard said:
My review:

For only $18 this is a steal.
I received not 1000 wikis but 1678. All live links and all from unique domains.

The article is well spunned but also readeable and that's a plus for google.

Report received in a nice excel document.

For the moment I don't see any serp movements since I just received my report few minutes ago. But I'm sure that in the next days/weeks my keywords will go up after this great wiki canon service.
Click to expand...

teck112 said:
Review:

Speed: Stated turn around time was 24-90 hours and I received the report in about 2 days. No problems here. 5/5

Quality: I looked at about 12 of the wiki's and all the links are present with the correct anchors. I gave him 3 url's all with multiple anchors and they were all spun correctly. The articles are readable but I personally would have preferred if they had been spun a little bit more. 4/5

Overall: I received 1946 wiki's so a huge over delivery. I received the report on time and the work was all done correctly. Personally I am more concerned about uniqueness and less concerned about quality when buying links in bulk so a higher % uniqueness on the articles would be preferable. Just my opinion I know some may differ. 4/5

No serp movement yet but I have only had the report for about 24 hours. I used this package on a URL that hasnt had any link building done on it in some time. If it moves I will report back.
Click to expand...

jimmyn said:
Fast turnaround! 3 days to receive the report.

User names on the wikis are all different by one letter. Articles are reasonably well spun, but could be spun a bit more.

All the links i checked were there and the report was sent in an excel sheet with all the urls in a handy list.

Will see if there is any SERP movement and report back.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the reviews. We will try to spin more for more uniqueness.
 
Review

Communication 5/5: I got the OP contact on gtalk and communication is top notch.
Speed 5/5: Work was completed within 2 days which is considered fast.
Quality 3.75/5: I got a spreadsheet with over 1800 wiki links which is awesome as the OP over-delivered by 80%. However, there are 2 things that I am not too satisfied with.

1) The article isn't spun to a great degree. I am more into uniqueness than readability for such massive scale link building.
2) Username isn't unique enough and this may leave a footprint.

Overall, I rate the service 4/5. Haven't seen any movement yet but I believe that is because a lot of the wikis aren't indexed as we speak. Will post back when I see any movement.
 
felixgoh said:
Review

Communication 5/5: I got the OP contact on gtalk and communication is top notch.
Speed 5/5: Work was completed within 2 days which is considered fast.
Quality 3.75/5: I got a spreadsheet with over 1800 wiki links which is awesome as the OP over-delivered by 80%. However, there are 2 things that I am not too satisfied with.

1) The article isn't spun to a great degree. I am more into uniqueness than readability for such massive scale link building.
2) Username isn't unique enough and this may leave a footprint.

Overall, I rate the service 4/5. Haven't seen any movement yet but I believe that is because a lot of the wikis aren't indexed as we speak. Will post back when I see any movement.
Click to expand...


Thanks for the review.

* About the article: We have started spinning the article with more than 70% uniqueness on the clients feedback

* Also we have working on footprint and fast indexing.

So there will be no problem for the WF members and they will get top quality service.
 
This looks like a nice offer - I'll be diversifying my keywords on a bunch of inner pages.

Will check back with an update of how the offer went - thanks!
 
Review

I got my report yesterday, so here I am with the review:

1. The report contained 1395 links, I checked them and 1273 were alive. That's a damn good result if you ask me.
2. Due to large number of links I was unable to check all of them manually, but I did check abotu 20-30 randomly. The average amount of words is 376. That's might be ok due to the fact that sometimes sentences get shorter during spinning process.
3. What I didn't like is that all links I checked had nofollow tag. That's not the fault of the provider, that's how wiki platform works, but I suppose he should mention this fact in the thread.
4. I also manually checked some wikis for indexation and I failed to find at least one indexed page, but I assume the might be because those resources were created only several days ago.
5. As for the spinning, articles are not of the worst quality I've ever seen, still they are not quite readable. Also I suppose spun articles are too similar to each other so lots of them won't ever be indexed.

I can't tell you anything certain about this service right now, cause it needs time to see how many links will be indexed and what results they will bring. That's why I posted all the info I gathered from my report for you to see the whole picture, still when speaking of whether you should or shouldn't order wiki cannon, the choice is yours :)
 
IMPORTANT NOTE: As per the client's feedback's, we have solved the problem of indexing and from now onwards for faster indexing we will be using linklicious + our indexing methods.

This applies for all the packages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom