WordAi - The Spinner That Takes the Labor Out of Labor Day Weekend

Status
Not open for further replies.
What settings are you using for WordAi? I've found as a rule of thumb, the article needs to have a WordAi Uniqueness of around 60-65% before it will pass Copyscape. So if your article doesn't pass it, I would change your settings from "Regular" to "Unique" and try again. If that still won't pass Copyscape, you might need to (for that article) use the regular Spinner (which all Turing users have access to). The quality will not quite be "human quality" (although it will be better than any other spinner on the market right now) but that will almost certainly pass Copyscape. The Turing Spinner is able to pass Copyscape for most articles (especially at the "Unique") setting; however there are some articles that are written in ways where there are not a lot of natural synonyms or rewrite possibilities. For those cases, the Standard Spinner will usually work just fine.

Also for passing Copyscape with the Turing Spinner, you should be using the "Super Unique" article (which is the first article WordAi shows you below the spintax).

Let me know if you have any other questions!


thanks for the reply! I was using the Turing spinner on "unique" and couldn't get any of my articles that I testedd it with to pass copyscape(yes I was using the 'Super Unique' spunned result for copyscape) , however, I do understand that my niche has alot of specific words that can't be changed and its harder... BUT, when I used the regular spinner and use the Extremely Unique it gives me exactly what I wanted and passes with no problem :) do you think this is okay to use on a private blog network with no need for readers?
 


word ai saved my family!
Thanks for that - sounds just what I want.
:D

thanks for the reply! I was using the Turing spinner on "unique" and couldn't get any of my articles that I testedd it with to pass copyscape(yes I was using the 'Super Unique' spunned result for copyscape) , however, I do understand that my niche has alot of specific words that can't be changed and its harder... BUT, when I used the regular spinner and use the Extremely Unique it gives me exactly what I wanted and passes with no problem :) do you think this is okay to use on a private blog network with no need for readers?
I generally recommend people use more seed articles so they can spin with higher readability (while still being unique). But yes, if you're running at "Extremely Unique" you should be absolutely fine with regards to content footprints. And in the case of a "blog network with no need for readers" that's generally what matters most.
 
I have been using since the early beta stage and WordAI is hands down the best solution for automatic spinning out there. Can't wait to see where it will go in the future.
 
i'm a little late chiming in, but it's worth doing. plenty of people who come to seo from a coding background are somewhat competent and, frankly, that's sufficient to make bank. the ability to automate tasks makes that possible, but it's not a particularly difficult problem and a half decent engineer is all it takes.

what cardine is doing *is* a difficult problem and he really knows his shit. i've read most of the worthwhile nlp academic literature from the last ten years and his stuff is well ahead. it's really difficult to explain, but trust me when i say that the incremental difficulty of doing what wordai does rather than what a good legacy spinner like tbs does is comparable to the incremental difference between a steam engine and landing a man on the moon.

those who've spoken to me about my engineering background know this, but for those who haven't, the tl;dr is that i can count the number of times i've seen something in sw engineering and didn't think i could do it much better if i could be bothered (given time and appropriate resources) on the fingers of one hand. i talked to cardine about the internals for hours, and the more we talked, the more obvious it became that this is one of those times. this realization caused me actual physical pain. i wish the brilliance could be explained without explaining half of the extant nlp literature, but it can't.

tl;dr: buy it. now. it's some next level yoda shit. i wish it had remained limited to the pre-launch group of users in perpetuity because it's a significant competitive advantage, but since the cat is out of the bag, i have no choice but to be honest in my assesment: you have no business doing what this was designed for in any other way.

-p
 
Last edited:
I have been using since the early beta stage and WordAI is hands down the best solution for automatic spinning out there. Can't wait to see where it will go in the future.
Thanks for the review, and trust me the future will be very bright. We're only getting started!

i'm a little late chiming in, but it's worth doing. plenty of people who come to seo from a coding background are somewhat competent and, frankly, that's sufficient to make bank. the ability to automate tasks makes that possible, but it's not a particularly difficult problem and a half decent engineer is all it takes.

what cardine is doing *is* a difficult problem and he really knows his shit. i've read most of the worthwhile nlp academic literature from the last ten years and his stuff is well ahead. it's really difficult to explain, but trust me when i say that the incremental difficulty of doing what wordai does rather than what a good legacy spinner like tbs does is comparable to the incremental difference between a steam engine and landing a man on the moon.

those who've spoken to me about my engineering background know this, but for those who haven't, the tl;dr is that i can count the number of times i've seen something in sw engineering and didn't think i could do it much better if i could be bothered (given time and appropriate resources) on the fingers of one hand. i talked to cardine about the internals for hours, and the more we talked, the more obvious it became that this is one of those times. this realization caused me actual physical pain. i wish the brilliance could be explained without explaining half of the extant nlp literature, but it can't.

tl;dr: buy it. now. it's some next level yoda shit. i wish it had remained limited to the pre-launch group of users in perpetuity because it's a significant competitive advantage, but since the cat is out of the bag, i have no choice but to be honest in my assesment: you have no business doing what this was designed for in any other way.

-p
Really appreciate the feedback! You're on a very short list of people whom I can talk to about this sort of stuff at a high level without feeling the need to dumb everything down (other candidates for this list include my notebook and the mirror). Those late night 3 hour conversations are some of the few times where real science happens :)
 
The Turing spinner isn't passing the Turing test for me in terms of value. What it does end up spinning is pretty good, my problems with it are
- At the default setting, it skips quite a few phrases
- Those phrases that are skipped still count against my quota

Mechanical Turk costs me about $100 to rewrite 100k words in 100 word chunks. I'd also get to reject work, which I can't do with some of these paragraphs I get back from the Turing spinner that are barely touched.

I can live with the Turing spinner as it is, but I hope you consider raising the Turing spinner's initial limit above 100K words.
 
Sorry cardine, can't PM yet.
Using the "unique" setting is an option, though the lower in quality I go, the better the $20 standard subscription starts looking.
At a 100K word limit, mturk is a better value. This is "Maelzel's Chess Player" (Edgar Allen Poe) all over again, where it costs nearly the same for me to feed the monkeys/midgets hidden in my wooden box compared to the cost for you to keep your servers running (and my monkeys/midgets play a better game of chess). Subjectively, I'd say the value equation isn't firmly in WordAi's favor until the limit is around 250K words. But I'd actually be satisfied w/ 100K if you were raising the limit gradually each month as server resources improved / you tweaked the algorithm for efficiency. Kind of like owning community shares of a farm, where you get a bigger box of produce during the harvest.
 
The Turing spinner isn't passing the Turing test for me in terms of value. What it does end up spinning is pretty good, my problems with it are
- At the default setting, it skips quite a few phrases
- Those phrases that are skipped still count against my quota

Mechanical Turk costs me about $100 to rewrite 100k words in 100 word chunks. I'd also get to reject work, which I can't do with some of these paragraphs I get back from the Turing spinner that are barely touched.

I can live with the Turing spinner as it is, but I hope you consider raising the Turing spinner's initial limit above 100K words.

Sorry cardine, can't PM yet.
Using the "unique" setting is an option, though the lower in quality I go, the better the $20 standard subscription starts looking.
At a 100K word limit, mturk is a better value. This is "Maelzel's Chess Player" (Edgar Allen Poe) all over again, where it costs nearly the same for me to feed the monkeys/midgets hidden in my wooden box compared to the cost for you to keep your servers running (and my monkeys/midgets play a better game of chess). Subjectively, I'd say the value equation isn't firmly in WordAi's favor until the limit is around 250K words. But I'd actually be satisfied w/ 100K if you were raising the limit gradually each month as server resources improved / you tweaked the algorithm for efficiency. Kind of like owning community shares of a farm, where you get a bigger box of produce during the harvest.
I understand completely where you are coming from regarding the word limit (which is a soft limit, you can go over it). The only reason the limit is there is because it requires an extraordinary amount of processing power to allow the Turing Spinner to "think". As economics of scale kick in that limit will absolutely go up and will very likely eventually reach 250k. And in that timeframe the AI (which is under constant development) should be greatly improved so that each setting will be more readable and more unique so that the differences between a turing article and mturk blur even more.

I don't like to make promises unless it is absolutely set in stone, but I can say with very high confidence that very soon that limit will be increased to 150k, and then pretty soon after that to 175k. Beyond that it depends on a lot of metrics I don't have yet, but it will very likely go up more over time.

Regardless, I am glad you find the quality of the Turing Spinner to be worthy of being included in the same conversation as content created by human workers (and bonus points for knowing what the Turing Test and The Turk actually are :))
 
Hello,

Just wanted to say i have been using this for a while and it works great !

The premium version of the spinner produce content that is human readable and in no time.

Cheers
 
Just signed up. Can't manage to keep the protected words actually protected, they get spinned with the rest of the paragraph.
Im using the regular spinner by the way.
 
Hello,

Just wanted to say i have been using this for a while and it works great !

The premium version of the spinner produce content that is human readable and in no time.

Cheers
Appreciate the feedback! :)
Just signed up. Can't manage to keep the protected words actually protected, they get spinned with the rest of the paragraph.
Im using the regular spinner by the way.
Protected words are case sensitive. I checked your account and you only have protected words in Title Case. If you also add lower case versions of those protected words you should not have any issues. I added that info on the "Protected Words" page to help prevent any confusion in the future.
 
So has anyone used the Turing spinner on an e-commerce store to spin product descriptions?

I'm trying this on ONE page, but don't want to risk it too much on my money domain. Not even gonna build links to it.

I have not tried it myself (not heavy in ecom) but I know that a lot of WordAi customers use the Turing spinner exactly for this.

My recommendation would be that it would work just fine, but I would still give it a quick manual lookover first. (Although that info applies pretty much to any money site that will likely be manually reviewed at some point).
 
If Im going to be a moderate load user...do I need the larger package??

Does anyone know the exact difference in the $29.95 from the $49.95??
 
i lyk this a lot
I lyk this comment.
If Im going to be a moderate load user...do I need the larger package??

Does anyone know the exact difference in the $29.95 from the $49.95??

The Standard Plan ($19.95/mo) will get you technology that does an exceptional job of spinning. It will be very unique and very readable, although it will not instantly create human readable spins.

The Turing Plan ($49.95/mo) uses much more advanced AI so it can generate something that could pass as human written technology in one click. The Turing technology is much more of a "rewriter" than a "spinner".

Also if you buy the Turing Plan you get access to both "versions" of WordAi, so if you find you like the "Standard" version of WordAi better you can simply downgrade your account and only use that spinning technology.

Hope that helps!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.