This has taken me 8 days to figure out but I think I've finally cracked it. Maybe it's my fault for letting this happen, but remember that I'm not a programming guy at all. I can code basic html but my specialty is marketing.
I have a few campaigns that for the last 3 months have made over $150k in revenue. The basic model is to use Adwords to send traffic to my site (full site, not LP) which then goes to the offer. Everything was great for those 3 months and the revenue was fairly consistent day in and day out.
Suddenly last week I got an email from G "disapproving" ALL my ads from my main campaign and siting the "affiliate url or bridge page" violation. Of course this is a big blow because it's 50% of my aff revenue.
This was a shock to me b/c I was using a 7 page site with content and aff links on each page, so I thought if I bulk up the site and get rid of most of the aff links, I'd get back in w/o a problem. I bulked the site up to 20 pages and included a blog and more articles. I eliminated every aff link but TWO as a test to make sure I can get approved again.
After several worthless phone conversations with G, they came back and said it's still violating the aff policy. This was very strange so I continued to dig further and didn't want to make any changes until I figured this one out b/c clearly my site now adds value to the user experience and is in compliance with policy.
Fortunately, I've kept good stats for the past 3 months and I started going to every site that I got leads from only to find that the company I was getting conversions for is NOW ON EVERY SITE I USED TO BE ON!
Then today I had another long convo with G and they tell me that one of the biggest ways they find out about sites violating policy is from people reporting other sites...
It's pretty clear what happened now. After the offer company was tired of paying me $150,000 they saw where the conversions were coming from, took my place, and then reported me to G.
Does this sound right or am I way off base?
Has anyone else been "disapproved" for a full site that adds value?
I have a few campaigns that for the last 3 months have made over $150k in revenue. The basic model is to use Adwords to send traffic to my site (full site, not LP) which then goes to the offer. Everything was great for those 3 months and the revenue was fairly consistent day in and day out.
Suddenly last week I got an email from G "disapproving" ALL my ads from my main campaign and siting the "affiliate url or bridge page" violation. Of course this is a big blow because it's 50% of my aff revenue.
This was a shock to me b/c I was using a 7 page site with content and aff links on each page, so I thought if I bulk up the site and get rid of most of the aff links, I'd get back in w/o a problem. I bulked the site up to 20 pages and included a blog and more articles. I eliminated every aff link but TWO as a test to make sure I can get approved again.
After several worthless phone conversations with G, they came back and said it's still violating the aff policy. This was very strange so I continued to dig further and didn't want to make any changes until I figured this one out b/c clearly my site now adds value to the user experience and is in compliance with policy.
Fortunately, I've kept good stats for the past 3 months and I started going to every site that I got leads from only to find that the company I was getting conversions for is NOW ON EVERY SITE I USED TO BE ON!
Then today I had another long convo with G and they tell me that one of the biggest ways they find out about sites violating policy is from people reporting other sites...
It's pretty clear what happened now. After the offer company was tired of paying me $150,000 they saw where the conversions were coming from, took my place, and then reported me to G.
Does this sound right or am I way off base?
Has anyone else been "disapproved" for a full site that adds value?