We've got plenty of problems inside our borders. But that won't stop us mucking about around the world, notably the middle east. Egypt, Libya, Yemen, and now Syria.
Critics say we haven't been doing a great job. From CNN's Cafferty:
So, how would you handle the mess? What would you do?
I'm sure a few of you are thinking, "Nuke the bastards." lol C'mon now. Any takers?
* lol at voters
** And then there's China.
In before lukep posts "Century Of Self" again.
Critics say we haven't been doing a great job. From CNN's Cafferty:
There's no money in the till here at home. A lot of lives are on the line. And we're in bed with so many dictators that saying, "Let us know when it's over" may not be an option.**The United States is threatening "targeted sanctions" against Syria in the wake of another bloody crackdown on protesters.
The National Security Council has accused Syria of "brutal violence" against its citizens, calling it "completely deplorable." It's tough talk - much tougher than what President Obama had to say on Friday. When he learned that 70 unarmed Syrian protesters were murdered by government security forces, the president issued a statement calling on "all sides to cease and desist." Huh?
President Obama isn't exactly getting high praise for his foreign policy these days. More than a month into a bloody civil war in Libya, the conflict appears to have reached a stalemate. After weeks of hemming and hawing and not saying a whole lot on the matter, Obama gave the OK for airstrikes against Libya, without consulting Congress first.
He said we would be involved in Libya for a "matter of days, not weeks." It's already approaching months. He said no American boots would ever be on the ground in Libya. Wrong again. We've been on the ground there for some time. Then last week, the president authorized the use of unmanned drone strikes in Libya in support of NATO airstrikes. Yet another expensive escalation. And violence continues to rage on throughout the region.
A piece on the Daily Beast calls Obama "a persuasive politician and diplomat who gets others to crawl out on limbs, has them take big risks to break through to a new future and then turns around and walks away from them when the political winds in the United States threaten to shift."
To think his critics had the temerity to suggest he didn't have the necessary experience to be president.*
So, how would you handle the mess? What would you do?
I'm sure a few of you are thinking, "Nuke the bastards." lol C'mon now. Any takers?
* lol at voters
** And then there's China.
In before lukep posts "Century Of Self" again.