Would something like the Aladdin be safe on a newer site?
Yeah. A good way to go.
Would something like the Aladdin be safe on a newer site?
jschmidli, I'd be great if the express setup version of Aladdin allowed for spun URLs
jschmidli, I'd be great if the express setup version of Aladdin allowed for spun URLs
agreed. Plus allow more then 3 keywords per project. Diversity seems to me way more important now. Love to be able to throw in 20 kw's.
I did express setup of Aladdins and it seems to take forever for the review (why even review it they're doing it themselves)
Yeah. A good way to go.
Just did an express run... article topic not even close to being relevant to my keyword. Anyone else run into this? (not bitching by any means, and I suspect it will get better, just curious.)
@guesswho: I would feel just fine for a new site. That is just an opinion. It's not really high on any numbers so to me it's how a site should be started + some high PR stuff and social signals.
Social bookmarks (not many anymore), blog posts, web 2,0's, articles, and a few high pr forum profiles. All in moderate numbers. Simple.
Awaiting updates on a new Aladdin set to get its stuff in at next-available spot, not overwriting existing projects, and I'll be bombing that thing left and right.
Also want to hear about updates to BLG-Connect planned. If there are none, I'll probably code more myself.
I did express setup of Aladdins and it seems to take forever for the review (why even review it they're doing it themselves)
Just did an express run... article topic not even close to being relevant to my keyword. Anyone else run into this? (not bitching by any means, and I suspect it will get better, just curious.)
Hmmm I just looked at mine and the article wasn't even spun. It was the same one over and over again for the web 2.0 and blog net work. They did a different article for the article directory but it was still not spun. Guess I'll hit them up today to find out what's going on.
I disagree that the value has increased. Has nobody noticed that the web 2.0 are now posted on their own private domain network rather then public web 2.0 sites? That drastically reduces their effectiveness and increases the footprint.
Yup, this was a great adjustment, the old 2.0's were getting erased left and right, these are sticking and boosting SERPs. A clear win.Over the past few months we did some research on the stick rate of the 2.0 sites and found that a large percentage did not stick for very long. Even using unique content and adding images and videos did not help that much.
If you look at software, like senuke that posts to 2.0 sites, they at best have 50 or so sites they post to. Of that 50 you will be lucky to get half to actually post. Out of the 20 or so that actually post, less than half will still be live in a week. Reposting to the 2.0's after a week or so was returning such low numbers that it was a waste of time. We have been reporting 20-40 sites in our 2.0 projects for months now but we did not feel right upping our delivery number because of the low stick rate. It is not doing us or our users any good to build links that only last a few days. Now it is possible to repost to the 2.0's to fully develop the site out and keep 25 sites active which is way more effective than before.
As for footprint we have more sites in our db than any script or desktop app. So actually the footprint will be spread out more than before.
Also, we have had quite a bit of feedback from our users about the way the new Aladdin is configured. Specifically, the PR linkwheel and bookmarks at the target site. We will be updating the Aladdin shortly to remedy the issue by pointing the bookmarks at the first tier (web 2.0's, articles, & blog posts) and removing the PR linkwheel since the xrummer blast in the second layer makes one of them redundant. The main objective of that layer is for indexing an getting noticed so we kept the project with the higher number of links in it.
We just about have all of the bugs worked out of the new system and have a little server capacity open so we will be opening an official sales thread in the BST section soon.
I can confirm that it's for real. We have had this in the works since last the end of last year and have been bustin our humps to get it done. We were going to keep it on the down low for a week to make sure we had the capacity covered enough and then blast it out to the world. But evolutionvision decided to let the Genie out of the bottle![]()
Here is the breakdown of what we changed. We will follow up with a proper sales thread next week.
- Premium users can now run one project from each of the three classes per day. Yeah 3 projects per day!!!
- The Magic Carpet and Aladdin projects have been combined and are now just the Aladdin. The new Aladdin has been reconfigured to point more of the links to the target site itself.
- The new Aladdin project runs in one day not 4 days as before. This now packs a whopping 7 project types into one day!
- The blast project types in the Aladdin project have had their delivery reduced.
- Web 2.0 delivery per day for premium users has been increased from 10 to 25.
- Date variables can now be inserted into projects much easier by checking off dates of past projects on a calendar.
- An account with The Best Spinner is no longer required to spin content.
- Express project set up is now available. Simply enter in your URL and Anchors and the system will do the rest. One great feature of the express is that each time it is scheduled it will scrape NEW content, spin it, insert your links, and post it. Create an Aladdin project by entering in two fields and que it up to run everyday and get new content for each project everyday of the month!
- The Lite and Standard packages have had their project types and deliveries updated. They both now have access to content projects but in lower daily deliveries than the Premium package.
Some sites in a private network like ours can become deindexed in one search engine or another. It is just the nature of the beast. We take every precaution possible(unique ip's, unique nameservers, private registration, ect.) but it is bound to happen. We considered removing the sites from our network but found they still helped for ranking in the other search engines and that many times they were indexed again a week or so later. We will be adding a large number of sites to our network over the next few months.
- The Lite free trial length has been reduced from one month to one week.
Ill get that password input changed. Thanks for pointing it out.