Israeli News Reports Obama promising attack on Iran by next June



No wars are won by physically attacking a country anymore. War begins with economic sabotage first. That much more devastating than any single warhead could be.
 
It's not that they fear iran will use a nuke, the problem they have is the leverage it will give them when they eventually reach that point. Once Iran has a nuke no one can fuck with them. The same way no one fucks with North Korea or Pakistan now, or USSR a few decades ago.

All this shit is about their interests, not about anyones safety. The 'terror' bullshit is thrown around so they can fuck other countries up the ass and take their oil, and they've been doing it for 60 years. They also don't give a fuck about democracy, otherwise the CIA wouldn't have overthrown Iran's democratically elected, secular Prime Minister back in 1953. Interesting how as soon as mossadegh tried to nationalise Iran's oil industry, the CIA and british MI6 step in and throw him out.

If you take a map you can see the US has military bases all around Iran. It's not a coincidence that the countries they've been getting involved with are all conveniently in the same oil rich part of the world. Iran's next on their list, they've been planning this for a while.


"take" there oil? who gets it for free? its more like getting the oil on the free market.

no one is stealing oil, we gave it back to iraq, kuwait.. we dont get all there oil for "FREE".

also the cia is not an all knowing all powerful force.. they make mistakes also.
 
No wars are won by physically attacking a country anymore. War begins with economic sabotage first. That much more devastating than any single warhead could be.


If this is true, the enemeys of the west dont have to do anything right now... we are doing the economic sabotage ourselves.

In modern war, if the wmds get used... nukes are one of your first picks to attack and defend targets.
 
Nuclear subs can go undetected. I know this because I saw The Hunt for Red October.
 
If this is true, the enemeys of the west dont have to do anything right now... we are doing the economic sabotage ourselves.

In modern war, if the wmds get used... nukes are one of your first picks to attack and defend targets.

Poor silly puppet thinks it's a west vs the rest of the world scenario right now. The truth is, it's only a handful of people fucking the world over ALL OVER THE GOD DAMN PLACE.
 
Nuclear subs can go undetected. I know this because I saw The Hunt for Red October.


We know where all nuclear subs are at all times?

That is great news.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1TkIxIhGhk&feature=player_embedded]Chinese Reporter Secured To A Rope - Reporting Typhoon - YouTube[/ame]
 
Poor silly puppet thinks it's a west vs the rest of the world scenario right now. The truth is, it's only a handful of people fucking the world over ALL OVER THE GOD DAMN PLACE.


More then a handful, there are a lot of people in the wagon right now.... only a HANDFUL really pulling it.
 
Still mad you were wrong on the nuke question? You can be wrong from time to time..... yes even you pewep

What was I wrong about? And better yet, how does that apply to Iran? Unless you're positing that Iran has been hiding their super-subs behind their outwardly pathetic navy?

You can't shift the goalposts from: "Iran can't have weapons because they could hurt us" to "some countries with super-advanced subs MIGHT be able to strike us with nukes".
 
Don't bother wasting your time dude, this idiot keeps throwing up dummy sentences and has the nerve to call those arguments.
 
What was I wrong about? And better yet, how does that apply to Iran? Unless you're positing that Iran has been hiding their super-subs behind their outwardly pathetic navy?

You can't shift the goalposts from: "Iran can't have weapons because they could hurt us" to "some countries with super-advanced subs MIGHT be able to strike us with nukes".


I was talking to pewep on being wrong on the dod knows were all nuke weapons etc are at all times.

Sorry about the confusion.... i was posting back and forth for different members here.

I dont think iran has a nuke arsenal right now... but there build up says to me they want to have a sort of option in the future... and the question is does one want to attack to cripple there program... i would not use nukes to take out there program...

i am also not saying attacking none military targets, attacking people if you will..carpet bombing citys for example.. just some targets to set back take out as much as possible a nuke program so they couldnt if they wanted to build nukes... fair?
 
No, you're wrong and I'm right. If you bothered to read the articles, you'd realize that you can't even assemble a nuclear weapon without the US knowing. Retard. And they'll track it until it expires.
 
No, you're wrong and I'm right. If you bothered to read the articles, you'd realize that you can't even assemble a nuclear weapon without the US knowing. Retard. And they'll track it until it expires.


lol, really.... the us knows even when a nuke is built.. wow that is a great trick...

Track from life to death.. the us is very powerful indeed.

Are you in the us? I mean a us citizen... US #1 !!!!!
 
You're dumb bro :). No doubt about that. Keep hiding your head in the sand and pretend that "the boogeyman" isn't real. That's all you loons are good at anyway. I never said the US is all powerful. I said assemble enough radioactive material to make a nuke and it can be detected through dozens of feet of lead in SPACE. There's a difference, fucking retard.