SCHOOL SHOOTING ... FUCK

oh and..

sweeppicker said:
Nobodys breaking into my house. LMAO
Click to expand...

..said every unsuspecting home burglary victim. the fact that you claim some sort of mystic visionary perspective makes taking you serious difficult.

unless you're a troll, in which case, I salute you.
 


hellblazer said:
You're lucky I even gave you a link. That's just to point your lazy ignorant ass in the right direction.

Go read Litvinenko's book, you lazy fuck, and shut the hell up until you know what you're talking about.

Do you even know what happened at Beslan?
Click to expand...

Of course I know what happened in Beslan, but why is that the, "only comparison to this" shooting? The circumstance and events of these massacres aren't even remotely similar. If this were an orchestrated attack blamed on a terrorist-sect the comparison would be far more relevant, but it was not.

-There were no hostages.
-There was one shooter according to witnesses.
-The shooting has not been claimed to be politically or religiously motivated.
-The scale of this shooting was far smaller.
-The only 100% factual relation is that children were killed by guns in a school. Any other relationship is assumed and unproven by your conspiracy theory.

You are making huge assumptions. Support the idea that this was a conspiracy with anything other than a distant comparison to a Russian massacre 8 years ago and your point would actually be debatable. Until you can establish any sort of relationship based on fact, your argument is simply drivel.
 
cassius said:
-The only 100% factual relation is that children were killed by guns in a school. Any other relationship is assumed and unproven by your conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...

The similarity is that Beslan was a false flag which used dead children, and this is a false flag that uses children. Beslan was used to go to war, this will be used to go to war against gun-owners.

They will try to exploit people's grief to fuel their Nazi-like push to shut down gun ownership.
 
hellblazer said:
The similarity is that Beslan was a false flag which used dead children, and this is a false flag that uses children. Beslan was used to go to war, this will be used to go to war against gun-owners.

They will try to exploit people's grief to fuel their Nazi-like push to shut down gun ownership.
Click to expand...

as·sump·tion

/əˈsəm(p)SHən/
Noun

  • A thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof: "they made certain assumptions about the market".
fact

/fakt/
Noun

  • A thing that is indisputably the case.


You are confusing these. Perhaps flash cards are in order?
 
cassius said:
as·sump·tion

/əˈsəm(p)SHən/
Noun
Click to expand...

Are you retarded? What makes you think I give two shits about what you think?

If it was truly a false flag, you really think the evidence would just be sitting there, right out in the open?

This is my analysis of what probably occurred. To state it's a fact would be insane. All we can do is make our best guess.

Agree or disagree, I could really care less what you think.

I love these butthurt kids who obsess over what I write and are so desperate to try and prove me wrong.
 
61405_10151624619432787_138630429_n.jpg
 
Unarmed Gunman said:
How was this a false flag?
Click to expand...

If I had to guess, they probably doped and brainwashed the kid. He was already messed up, which is probably why they selected him.

There's tons of stuff out there you can give someone, give them some orders, and it lasts for days or weeks.

Pretty clean that he's dead, eh? Dead men tell no tales.

And his mom? Dead.

You see that Aurora killer at trial? Dude couldn't even focus, he'd been given some pretty potent stuff.
 
If this video gets out people will overwhelmingly demand to take away our guns. AJ prob does more harm than good with the 2nd amendment - reminds me of Hellblazer. Mostly talking about the crazy screaming at the end of the vid.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3LRUq_rppg&list=UL"]Murderers Want Your Guns - YouTube[/ame]
 
johnmatrix said:
61405_10151624619432787_138630429_n.jpg
Click to expand...

...because those numbers have absolutely everything to do with handgun prevalence and nothing to do with culture/government right?

when you consider the US has the highest prison population, tenfold than any other country in the world, it makes it easy to see why there might be so many gun deaths when virtually everything you do is considered illegal.

it's also telling here in the US when you're 30 times more likely to get shot by a police officer than you are a mass shooting victim.
 
hellblazer said:
Money quote:

"We're gonna have to take meaningful action, regardless of the politics..." (link: Obama pretends to cry)

I told you suckers, the communists are coming for your guns...
Click to expand...

LOL. He doesn't have to come after your guns. All he needs to do is follow the Swiss example which permits people to own guns and keep them in their own houses, but bans ammunition.

In Switzerland, all ammunition is kept in central depots/arsenals and if you want to use ammunition, you need to go to the depot and say why you want it.

Best of all Obama doesn't need Congress's permission, he can just issue an Executive Order banning ammunition, and it's all perfectly legal - the 2nd Amendment says you have the right to bear arms but says nothing about the right to bear ammunition.

If I was Obama, that's what I'd do, if only to cut down on the monthly speech about dead civilians who have been mown down by this nutter or that.

But I bet he won't do it, he's too much of a wuss, he'll seek to negotiate and stuff.
 
sweeppicker said:
people in states with many guns have elevated rates of homicide, particularly firearm homicide
Click to expand...

If you look at the details, you will notice that the high gun ownership states also have nearly twice the amount of non-firearm homicides. (The non-firearm homicide rate for the USA is also much higher than the total homicide rates for many other countries.)

The "Bible belt" states tend to have the highest rates of violence, whether it is with knives, fists, or whatever. These states also tend to be the ones with higher rates of gun ownership.

People in the northeast have the same "fist ownership rate" as those in the south, but fists in the south are more likely overall to end up punching someone in the face. If the mere presence of fists alone was the sole causation for fist violence, then the rate would be the same all over.


from the study :

"many other factors may affect homicide rates..."

"Our study did not provide information about causation..."

"this result does not rule out the possibility that reverse causation or a noncausal explanation accounts for the association between rates of firearm ownership and homicide. It is possible, for example, that locally elevated homicide rates may have led to increased local gun acquisition..."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom