Police and social services apologise after paedophile gang of seven are found guilty

First of all, slam is a religion, but it is so intertwined into that specific race of people that the distinction between the two (race and religion) is currently irrelevant..

The majority of Muslims are Asian. Most Muslims in Iran are Persian. Millions of people in Egypt are Christian..

The racial appearance of a typical Somali Muslim is quite a bit different than that of Turkish Muslims like Dr. Oz, or of Russian area Muslims, such as the Boston bombers.


With your logic.. After the female 50% of the muslim community "points the finger back"... It's not hard for the males to point the finger right back bc we're all part of the larger group of humans.. and thus we're all more likely to rape another human.. Shit don't make sense.
You're actually helping make my point more clear. There are over 1.5 billion Muslims, therefore statistically speaking pointing the finger at all of them as a "community" is not too far off from pointing the finger at all humans as a whole.
 


Dude I agree with you. 100% Islam is the most horrible thing to ever happen to mankind. Before Islam the middle east was the center of scientific discovery in the entire world. After Islam.... You get the picture.

My Problem is you're judging an entire group of people based on the actions of 3 men. How would you like it if you were judged based on the worst of your kind?

I am simply saying there is a growing trend in this group. One that should be minimized through immigration and visa laws.
 
Child sexual abuse by UN peacekeepers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/jul/29/unitednations
INTERNATIONAL: UN Sex Crimes Whistleblower Wrongfully Dismissed - News Library - News & Events - PeaceWomen

There is a pretty well done film on the topic. And guess what? Those guys never got any trial, since they enjoyed diplomatic immunity.

Also, even though I can't be bothered to look it up, I'm sure plenty such issues have happened during the 180+ military interventions by the US armed forces alone during the last 120 years; colonizers tend to not treat natives very well (never mind all the interventions by the Brits)
History of U.S. Military Interventions since 1890

(BTW, if you are a complete ignoramus, the least you can do is use the mighty google before pulling facts out of your ass)

P.S. White Brits are considered Anglo-Saxons, not Caucasians. Caucasians come from the Caucasus region. Dumb-ass.
Relax, Google boy.

If you'd read a thread before leaping into lecture mode you'd realize I chose my words carefully in order to directly echo guerilla's words:
"Right, because white, English speaking Caucasians have never raped anyone or been pedophiles."

And within a conversation about crime in society you cite armed occupational forces as a demographical slice?

So audacious.

Someone should throw a bag over your head and take pictures of your grapefruit sized balls.
 
And within a conversation about crime in society you cite armed occupational forces as a demographical slice?
Why not?

White folk get a pass because they commit their atrocities in a uniform?

The uniform is just an abstraction. Underneath it is a man, just like any other.
 
Why not?

White folk get a pass because they commit their atrocities in a uniform?
I don't hold atrocities of Japanese occupational troops against the Japanese people.

Am I giving the Japanese a pass?

The uniform is just an abstraction. Underneath it is a man, just like any other.
Agreed.

But until greenleaves equivocated occupational troop behavior with civilian behavior that basic fact had no bearing on the topic of this thread.
 
Why not?

White folk get a pass because they commit their atrocities in a uniform?

The uniform is just an abstraction. Underneath it is a man, just like any other.

By and large our politicians speak out against crimes against humanity, when the public find out about enhanced interrogation it is spoken against, doesnt mean it is removed from the techniques used, but it is addressed as something we dont condone. The people in power quite often speak against and take additional preventative measures to minimize any harm to innocent people. It doesnt always work, but there will be lip service to our desire to do whatever we do with minimal civilian causalities. It is extremely different then being raised and taught to treat woman as pieces of shit, they are dogs and if you want to bash their heads in while you fuck them, up to you. The piece of shit in the video I posted is real and openly speaking like that. Because its natural to him, its the way he is raised.

So when some why guy puts enough dots together to see this, it isnt because of prejudice or that people are bigots, no. Its because we want people who dont value human life out of our countries. Its because the other trained monkeys that run the countries where these people come from are not openly condemning anything. Nope. Nothing is ever said. Just like Jessee Fuckingasshole Jackson never says anything against black on white crime, but he has 10 thousand dicks in his mouth the second a white person cuts a black person in line at Taco Bell.

Sure there are bad people everywhere, from every corner of the earth. But if enough people from the same neighborhood keeps doing similar crimes, then the whole neighborhood is bad. OR THE NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD OPENLY CONDEMN IT AND POLICE THEIR FUCKING PEOPLE, which never has happened.
 
Relax, Google boy.

If you'd read a thread before leaping into lecture mode you'd realize I chose my words carefully in order to directly echo guerilla's words:
"Right, because white, English speaking Caucasians have never raped anyone or been pedophiles."

And within a conversation about crime in society you cite armed occupational forces as a demographical slice?

So audacious.

Someone should throw a bag over your head and take pictures of your grapefruit sized balls.

What you have to understand is that no matter how many times you show them the evidence of the Muslim-on-native-citizenry violence within these European countries, the response will invariably be:

-citation of similar crimes by whites.
-ridiculous comparisons to military acts committed by whites
-accusations of xenophobia and/or racism

They've been programmed by certain elements in the culture to misperceive what is truly occurring by automatically diverting to these built-in, reflexive attacks. It is an unconscious response which will generally always trigger the same way.

The ironic thing is that these same deluded people usually possess the greatest arrogance as well, derived from their implanted beliefs that those illuminating them are inferior to them. This then leads them to subconscious delusions of grandeur and superiority, which leads to reinforcement of brainwashed narratives, which leads to greater feelings of superiority, and so on and on... It's a never-ending loop, as it's designed to be. Few break it.

Note also how incredibly similar the leftists and anarchists sound in a thread like this. It only reinforces the fact that in many, many ways, they are merely two sides of the same coin.
 
What you have to understand is that no matter how many times you show them the evidence of the Muslim-on-native-citizenry violence within these European countries
But again, what difference does that make?

Americans kill way more civilian Muslims than Muslims kill Europeans.

They are bad, you are good. *yawn*
 
no matter how many times you show them the evidence of the Muslim-on-native-citizenry violence within these European countries, the response will invariably be:

-citation of similar crimes by whites.
-ridiculous comparisons to military acts committed by whites
-accusations of xenophobia and/or racism

Americans kill way more civilian Muslims...

Exhibit A: a citation of similar crimes(although murder is merely one aspect) committed by whites.
 
Exhibit A: a citation of similar crimes(although murder is merely one aspect) committed by whites.
That's exactly what it was.

Your "side" is no better than the people you despise, but you're selective about who you call out, making you a hypocrite.
 
That's exactly what it was.

Your "side" is no better than the people you despise, but you're selective about who you call out, making you a hypocrite.

Of course, hypocrisy is no problem for someone who is completely fucking nuts.

:smug:

Continuing with Exhibit A, we notice this individual responds with arrogance and superiority when his implanted narrative is challenged:

these same deluded people usually possess the greatest arrogance as well, derived from their implanted beliefs that those illuminating them are inferior to them.

This then leads them to subconscious delusions of grandeur and superiority, which leads to reinforcement of brainwashed narratives, which leads to greater feelings of superiority, and so on and on... It's a never-ending loop, as it's designed to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thehobbster
Basic facts should always have bearing, n'est-ce pas?
Yes. But not all basic facts are relevant to the subject at hand. My opinion is that his earnest pleas to watch documentary films and google facts were did little to disprove a point that I was only half-heartedly interested in making in the first place.

greenleaves' interest, however, is sharp. He neg repped me and wrote "answer me faggot" on my reputation thingy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thehobbster
Continuing with Exhibit A, we notice this individual feels arrogance and superiority towards the person who is contradicting his implanted narratives
Arrogance and superiority, even if I felt them, wouldn't validate your bad position in this discussion.

Your side slaughters women and children, and then you try to white knight young girls being abused by Muslims in Europe.

When you don't have credibility (or a non-collectivist argument) have the sense to say nothing.

Btw, attacking me personally = leftist tactic, collectivist argument = leftist position.

Which one of us isn't a leftist?

This is what I meant in the other thread where I said you contradict yourself (or create a performative contradiction) and you're oblivious to it. It's hilarious tbh.
 
Arrogance and superiority, even if I felt them, wouldn't validate your bad position in this discussion.

Not only do you clearly feel them, but your reflexive response was strikingly similar to the many other deluded individuals in this thread.

The responses manifested throughout this thread are the validation.

Your side slaughters women and children...

I have no idea what you're talking about.

attacking me personally = leftist tactic...

An attack like this, perhaps?

someone who is completely fucking nuts...

:smug:

collectivist argument = leftist position...

You possess the rather curious belief that government should not exist whatsoever and thus any argument for any government function is a "collectivist argument".

According to that interesting logic, anyone who disagrees with you is a "collectivist".

So forgive me if I didn't take your wild accusations of "contradictions" seriously.

Leftists and anarchists are two sides of the same coin.

Aside from economic differences, they share the same brainwashing on social issues and many others, while generally employing the same tactics and responses, as you have so aptly demonstrated.
 
monkeys that run the countries where these people come from

Female political leaders in Islam and in Muslim-majority countries - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Indonesia, the most populous Muslim-majority country, elected Megawati Sukarnoputri as president[2]

Pakistan, the second most populous Muslim-majority country, twice (non-consecutively) elected Benazir Bhutto as prime minister[3]

Bangladesh, the third most populous Muslim-majority country, elected Khaleda Zia[4] and Sheikh Hasina as prime ministers...


Nearly one-third of the Parliament of Egypt- the fifth most populous Muslim majority nation- also consists of women.


are not openly condemning anything.

Egypt's parliament outlaws female circumcision

Cairo Police Arrest 400 Teens for 'Flirting' in Sexual Harassment Crackdown | Fox News
 
Note also how incredibly similar the leftists and anarchists sound in a thread like this.

You mean like how atheists and Christians can often sound similar in threads like this? (In case you forgot, Obama would have won by a historic landslide if only atheists were allowed to vote.)
 
Relax, Google boy.

If you'd read a thread before leaping into lecture mode you'd realize I chose my words carefully in order to directly echo guerilla's words:
"Right, because white, English speaking Caucasians have never raped anyone or been pedophiles."

And within a conversation about crime in society you cite armed occupational forces as a demographical slice?

So audacious.

Someone should throw a bag over your head and take pictures of your grapefruit sized balls.

Specifically in the Bosnia UN incident, the ones involved were administrative workers. Not soldiers in an active combat area.

So your retort that this was done under the duress of combat is not valid.

A simple Google search of 'pedophile ring orphanage' brings up other cases of white guys involved in pedophile rings (and no war to 'justify'):
Catholic order had 'pedophile ring' in Vic
Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian
Police in Wales say pedophile ring inquiry uncovers new victims | Fox News
‘House of Horrors’ investigated - child abuse ring in Dublin led by police saw 50-years of sexual abuse | Irish News | IrishCentral
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sex_abuse_cases

Come to think of it, the catholic church is probably the biggest, longest standing pedophile ring in history. I mean, they make men not have sex and not masturbate and then put children who are from marginalized parts of society in their company and custody. That is bound to lead to something negative. And as any institution's purpose is to self perpetuate, they will cover it up.



Listen, I acknowledged that the tide of low class Muslim in Europe is a problem. I acknowledge that they are more likely to commit crimes (including pedophilia) than the native mostly middle class and well educated europeans.

But that doesn't mean Muslims are somehow the only people to commit pedophilia (which is what your reply implied).


The fact remains, kids from broken homes get abused. Everywhere. Before and now. And from people of all religious affiliations and skin color. Human scum isn't limited to one race or religion.

I read the thread right. Your logic is what is failing. It is very much like Dresden's. And I think anyone even remotely reasonable can agree he is just a notch above retardation (the part of 'notch' is easily disputable; I'll agree)



BTW, saying I have big balls is to me, a compliment. So thank you.