Police and social services apologise after paedophile gang of seven are found guilty

You possess the rather curious belief that government should not exist whatsoever
Government doesn't exist, it's a delusion.

and thus any argument for any government function is a "collectivist argument".
No, you're a collectivist because you see people as acting in groups. You're not a methodological individualist, and that makes you a bad.

According to that interesting logic, anyone who disagrees with you is a "collectivist".
Anyone who disagrees with me who can't form an argument based in facts and logic is an idiot. Collectivists, by default have a position that isn't logical, and so they are idiots.

Don't confuse the two.

So forgive me if I didn't take your wild accusations of "contradictions" seriously.
There is nothing to be forgiven. You're trying to articulate intelligent arguments without doing any of the necessary ground work or adhering to any norms of good argumentation.

You think because you read Worldnet daily and listen to Glenn Beck you're a right wing intellectual, but you're not. The worst part is, you're too arrogant to understand the stuff you're saying is nonsense, and that anyone with half a brain is laughing at your posts. But you have this confirmation bias (Dunning-Kruger) that leads you to believe folks laugh at you because they are bads, not because you're bad. Because in your world, you're never wrong.

Leftists and anarchists are two sides of the same coin.

Aside from economic differences, they share the same brainwashing on social issues and many others, while generally employing the same tactics and responses, as you have so aptly demonstrated.
This just demonstrates how little you understand about anarchism.

You've got far more in common with leftists, and not just your style of argumentation, than I do. You are a statist. They are statists.

They don't understand economics, you don't understand economics.

They don't have a coherent ethical theory, neither do you.

They don't respect property rights, you don't respect property rights.

They support big government, you support big government.

I mean, seriously dude. This isn't a personal attack. This is actually where you're so full of contradictions and you don't get it. You are completely oblivious to the fact that everything you believe and promote, are distinctions without differences from leftists.

I have a radically different agenda from both you and leftists. But again, because you're intellectual lazy/sloppy/stupid, you've still not been able to pick up on what those differences are, after literally 100s of thousands of words have been written on this forum to explain it.

So really, at the end of the day, should I feel bad for wasting so much time talking to someone who is probably insane, or should you feel just a little bit of shame, because you don't know what you are talking about, but persist in yelling at the top of your lungs regardless.
 


And from people of all religious affiliations and skin color. Human scum isn't limited to one race or religion.
I bet if you go back 200+ years into each of our predecessors, all of us have rape and pedophilia in our family history.

That doesn't make it right, but it means that humans in general just don't have a very good track record on this stuff, regardless of culture.

It's sort of like Christians who talk down about Muslims stoning people, when Christians were burning women at the stake just 200 years ago.
 
I bet if you go back 200+ years into each of our predecessors, all of us have rape and pedophilia in our family history.

That doesn't make it right, but it means that humans in general just don't have a very good track record on this stuff, regardless of culture.

It's sort of like Christians who talk down about Muslims stoning people, when Christians were burning women at the stake just 200 years ago.

You don't have to go that far back:
In 2003, Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York authorized payments of as much as $20,000 to sexually abusive priests to convince them to leave the priesthood.

A strong percentage of the cases involve raping kids that are prepubescent.

Amazing how ignorant people can take strong positions based off shit they see on TV without even taking the 0.1 seconds it takes to do a google search and soak up a bit of the sea of knowledge that is at the tip of their fingers.



If infoslob can prove anything I said wrong, I'll be glad to agree and apologize. It comes with having big balls (I don't normally view myself in such light, but if I get the compliment I'll take it) Of course, people with tiny balls tend to either hide when confronted with the truth, or deny it; but never argue it rationally.
 
Amazing how ignorant people can take strong positions based off shit they see on TV without even taking the 0.1 seconds it takes to do a google search and soak up a bit of the sea of knowledge that is at the tip of their fingers.
I came to the realization last year that most people are pretty dumb, enjoy being dumb, are hyper emotional, easy to manipulate, lack the ability to critically think, and have no concept of intellectual pride.

Forget honesty, courage, consistency, or character.

That's why I spend more time with my dogs than arguing on the internet these days. My dogs don't promote government programs or political parties.

They don't care if someone is gay (they will sniff that crotch regardless). They don't try to stop anyone from smoking a harmless plant, or invade anyone's country.

They don't tax, they don't lie and they don't try to tell me they have any spiritual authority on the earth. They don't know what Islam, Christianity or Atheism is, and thank God (pun intended) for that.

All they really care about is barking at deer, chasing cars and licking their assholes clean while laying in the sun. And these days, that sounds like a lot more fun than engaging idiots or trying to save the world.
 
I came to the realization last year that most people are pretty dumb, enjoy being dumb, are hyper emotional, easy to manipulate, lack the ability to critically think, and have no concept of intellectual pride.

Forget honesty, courage, consistency, or character.

That's why I spend more time with my dogs than arguing on the internet these days. My dogs don't promote government programs or political parties.

They don't care if someone is gay (they will sniff that crotch regardless). They don't try to stop anyone from smoking a harmless plant, or invade anyone's country.

They don't tax, they don't lie and they don't try to tell me they have any spiritual authority on the earth. They don't know what Islam, Christianity or Atheism is, and thank God (pun intended) for that.

All they really care about is barking at deer, chasing cars and licking their assholes clean while laying in the sun. And these days, that sounds like a lot more fun than engaging idiots or trying to save the world.

While we have and do disagree on a lot, I have always enjoyed disagreeing with you <3


And on that post I agree 100%.


The only reason I rage isn't to save the world. It is cathartic to me. I've had a lot of problems in my personal life lately, and telling a retard he is a retard can help.

I'm living away from my fiancee, my dog, and have had one issue after another. I can't tell people off to solve my problems. It will have the contrary effect. But I can rip apart the arguments of retards on WF without any real negative consequences (a neg rep, lol, if that is 'negative' in your perspective infoslob/hellblazer... you have bigger problems to deal with)


So... no reply to this?
http://www.wickedfire.com/redirect.php?url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sex_abuse_cases
 
You don't have to go that far back:
In 2003, Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York authorized payments of as much as $20,000 to sexually abusive priests to convince them to leave the priesthood.

A strong percentage of the cases involve raping kids that are prepubescent.

Amazing how ignorant people can take strong positions based off shit they see on TV without even taking the 0.1 seconds it takes to do a google search and soak up a bit of the sea of knowledge that is at the tip of their fingers.



If infoslob can prove anything I said wrong, I'll be glad to agree and apologize. It comes with having big balls (I don't normally view myself in such light, but if I get the compliment I'll take it) Of course, people with tiny balls tend to either hide when confronted with the truth, or deny it; but never argue it rationally.
This thread has AIDS.
 
you are a statist...

you don't understand economics...

you don't respect property rights...

you support big government...

everything you believe and promote are distinctions without differences from leftists...

The anarchist believes that government should not exist at all.

Some are so invested in this belief that they think government doesn't actually exist, except for in the minds of men; within this paradigm, all that is necessary is for the people to be freed of their mythical mental shackles. It is the revolution that never happens.

Similarly to leftists, anarchists view anyone who disagrees with them as the enemy.

Anyone who thinks government can serve a necessary function is then a "statist" who supports "big government".

Substitute "collectivist" below with "statist" or any other "big government" slur and it becomes manifestly clear.

the rather curious belief that government should not exist whatsoever and thus any argument for any government function is a "collectivist argument".

According to that interesting logic, anyone who disagrees with you is a "collectivist".

In the mind of an anarchist like guerilla, a perfect world is one without any government at all.

In fact, he is so invested in this belief that he has already psychologically moved to that world:

Government doesn't exist...

Leftists and anarchists differ mostly on economic views. On social issues and many others, they might as well share the same brain. They both support drug addicts, homosexuals destroying the institution of marriage, a neutered military, and a bevy of other culturally destructive initiatives.

So what do we get as proof that they are vastly different? Unsurprisingly, a list of economic areas that they disagree on:

They don't understand economics...

They support big government...

They don't respect property rights...

They are statists...

But the psychological blueprint for leftists and anarchists is eerily similar. They have both been conditioned with Pavlovian-esque responses to a variety of issues. They both view those who differ from them as inferior and stupid.

They are both programmed to respond with insults when their fragile paradigm is threatened:

idiot...

you read Worldnet daily...

you listen to Glenn Beck...

you're not a right wing intellectual...

you're too arrogant...

the stuff you're saying is nonsense...

anyone with half a brain is laughing at your posts...

you're so full of contradictions...

You are completely oblivious...

you're intellectual lazy/sloppy/stupid...

insane...

you don't know what you are talking about...

you have this confirmation bias...

dumb...

hyper emotional...

easy to manipulate...

lack the ability to critically think...

no concept of intellectual pride...

That's why you can't distinguish between leftists and anarchists many times, not just on this thread, but many others.

On the topic of the Islamic takeover of Europe, they both respond with accusations of xenophobia, jingoism, racism, and regionalism. They both victoriously vanquish the plucked-out-of-thin-air strawman argument that "whites never commit crimes".

They both refuse to see the growing danger right in front of their eyes.

Ironically enough, I never read WND except for the odd time here and there. I don't have time to listen to Beck. I don't watch Fox, mostly because I don't see much difference between them and the other dinosaur networks.

The response from these types of people is fascinating in and of itself. The accusations are boringly predictable. They don't understand these notions because they are still stuck inside the box. They don't understand how someone could come up with these ideas. The very concepts are so threateningly foreign.

So all they're left with is Fox. Or Beck. Or WND. Or take your pick. Their response is telling in and of itself.
 
I'm sorry, did Reddit shut down for the night?

Huh?

Your argument is super coherent. When faced with logic, reply with {insertstupidcomment}

Thanks for proving your a fucking retard.

Just FYI, I'm not liberal, I'm not conservative, I'm not libertarian, I'm not anarchist, I'm not communist (though I just ordered Carl Marx's the communist manifesto), I'm not capitalist (though I have a copy of the Wealth of nations), I'm not socialist, I'm not Christian, I'm not Athiest, I'm not muslim (though I'd like to read both the Bible and Koran one day), I'm not... any ism...

I happen to believe that reality is extremely complex, and that there are no answers in life. Great thinkers have proposed great ideas, and many I admire, but they are dead. Our life is about finding new solutions to the complexities of life. The search for answers is the answer, not any single answer that someone has come up with.
 
The only reason I rage isn't to save the world. It is cathartic to me. I've had a lot of problems in my personal life lately, and telling a retard he is a retard can help.
Just don't expect the retard to learn anything. The reason why these guys are the way they are, can't be cured with an intelligent question or post. They are evolutionary dead ends running out the clock on their gene pool.
 
Just don't expect the retard to learn anything. The reason why these guys are the way they are, can't be cured with an intelligent question or post. They are evolutionary dead ends running out the clock on their gene pool.

I wish evolution worked like that, but I have some evidence to the contrary, it's most people :)