Richard Dawkins to Arrest The Pope

One promotes fairy tales, the other the science, there is a big difference.

You can't prove or disprove the existence of God via science, so why the fuck do atheists continue pretending they're on the side of 'science'? It's all fucking opinion.

As for the Catholic Church 'perpetuating' child rape, that's just preposterous bullshit. If you really looked at the stats, a child has a better chance of being raped at one of our public schools than in a Catholic church, but stepping back from the NYT-induced ZOMG hysteria would require actually thinking logically about the facts instead of a knee-jerk, anti-religion impulse some fools prefer, so no chance of that.
 


You can't prove or disprove the existence of God via science, so why the fuck do atheists continue pretending they're on the side of 'science'?

You answered your own question pretty well there. Congratulations.
 
...If you really looked at the stats, a child has a better chance of being raped at one of our public schools than in a Catholic church...

I have no idea if your "stats" are even close to true, but I can tell you that if a child was raped in school the mother fucker doing the raping would be in jail if he was caught. Not so much with the Catholic Church.
 
As for the Catholic Church 'perpetuating' child rape, that's just preposterous bullshit. If you really looked at the stats, a child has a better chance of being raped at one of our public schools than in a Catholic church, but stepping back from the NYT-induced ZOMG hysteria would require actually thinking logically about the facts instead of a knee-jerk, anti-religion impulse some fools prefer, so no chance of that.

Yes but no public school, nor secretary of state for education, would permit a known paedophile to return to working with children. Nor would they actively cover-up of their activities with the view to obstructing justice.
 
I have no idea if your "stats" are even close to true, but I can tell you that if a child was raped in school the mother fucker doing the raping would be in jail if he was caught. Not so much with the Catholic Church.

exactly.
 
As for the Catholic Church 'perpetuating' child rape, that's just preposterous bullshit. If you really looked at the stats, a child has a better chance of being raped at one of our public schools than in a Catholic church...

Source?

Historically, the Catholic Church has been full of pedophiles and homosexuals, because who else would renounce all sexual relations with a woman? You can't put a requirement like that on priests and only expect normal, heterosexual males. In fact, you shouldn't expect many at all.
 
That was the best you could come up with? Come on.

Why do I have to do the leg work for you?

As an aside, I was watching Dawkins the other day where he was commenting on the autopsy of an elephant.

He said (I'm paraphrasing, cannot remember word for word):

"Looking at this elephant, its inner workings are just so marvellous that you would think it had been purposely designed. But it wasn't, it was just an accident of evolution."

That struck me as so funny. But then that's just me.
 
Well Well well

Well Well well..... I like how the Pope is from Germany and he has a church in every city Big small in the United States and most of the world and people think its cool..... Read your Bibles and History books....! Revelation explains everything unless God has made you blind to things..... I'm no conspiracy guy
but this stuff really is starting to ad up..... the seven churches... we have been blinded by our Government......

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_52Hyr2L-rE]YouTube - Revelation 2 & 3 The 7 Churches #1[/ame]
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxG4Kji-u28]YouTube - Richard Dawkins Owned, Note he did not answer the question[/ame]
 
Clearly you haven't read a word Dawkins has ever written... How can you think he's a fanatic? He's just opposing bullshit dogma and providing something closer to proof and reasoning than any religionist could ever fumble over.

And back to the fanatism thing, does he ask for money?

Does he go around knocking on peoples doors asking to read from a science book?

Does he say they will die a painful death if they don't believe him and a wonderful death if they do?

Does he start wars on people who oppose him?

Does he insist people come to a big building numerous times a week, sing songs, donate money and get bored, just so they have a nice death, or else?

Does he crash planes into buildings?

Does he stand on a plinth in cities reading from an old book rewritten 40,000 times and wasn't even first written until 400 years after the events had supposedly occurred and them proclaim it as true?

I could carry on all day... Religion is fucking evil and closed minded. Dawkins promotes open thinking, which is a good thing in the modern world. By being an atheist I don't chose science over religion, I chose no religion.

I don't need to try and prove something else to be true to vindicate my non-beliefs, simply because i have no beliefs. That's how religionists think, it's the way they've been taught. "If you can't prove it's not true, then it must be!" Come on, that's bullshit, read about the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

Look, I simply don't believe. I don't have to prove something else to justify my reasons, because I don't believe in anything, so therefore have nothing to prove.

I was going to write a response to this thread and then I saw your post and realized that mine would be redundant because you have already hit the nail on the head.

+rep for having parents who raised you properly, we are among the fortunate few...
 
Idk why people who consider themselves "atheists" constantly try to fight religions. if you don't believe in it you shouldn't give a shit about it either. if someone wants to get bored every sunday, so let it be and enjoy the empty roads for 1 or 2 hours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjdaz
I really don't want to bash Dawkins. I actually really respect the guy a lot. And I've read his book "The God Delusion" and found there to be a lot of great stuff in it. I agree with most of what he says and he's a smart dude. However, he is far from being a Bacon or a Newton, both who championed a divine being and both who were heavily tied into mystical and occult teachings.

Him being a fanatic has to do with him treating science the same as people treat religion. He puts it as the answer to everything and we all know science is always changing. It is possible for a correct view to be scientifically wrong and for the person with that view to be wrong until science catches up.

That said, I think it's great what he's doing. Screw the Pope. As far as I'm concerned the Pope's the biggest criminal (front man, anyway) on our planet. I would love to see the Vatican go down, but it's just not gonna happen. They've been ruling the planet for thousands of years and I don't see them going away anytime soon.
 
Atheism

Atheism= spoiled people that haven't gone through real persecution........
because they will have to bow on their knees and confess or go to hell...
ouch i'm down for Christ came in peace and Love..... Showed Himself as
God.......
 
One promotes fairy tales, the other the science, there is a big difference.

If by science you mean the great minds that have "proven" global warming...then I will advice being as skeptical of science as you are about religeon.
 
Idk why people who consider themselves "atheists" constantly try to fight religions. if you don't believe in it you shouldn't give a shit about it either. if someone wants to get bored every sunday, so let it be and enjoy the empty roads for 1 or 2 hours.

OMG....FINALLY someone understands atheism. The rest of you are wanabes
 
Richard Dawkins is a funny dude.

As for hating on religious people, I don't even give a shit, but I also don't give a shit of non-believers hate on religious people either? ricdes' analysis is kind of silly.