lolollo ppc-coach?Fucking pay the man. I'm glad im not promoting affiliate programs anymore, I had to chase 9k for 6 months once.
While working direct with an advertiser will offer some benefits, rapid and/or guaranteed payments is not one of them. Anyone deciding to go direct for that reason only is in for a big surprise.
Well, that certainly convinced me. I think I'll go log into my Hydra account and see what offers you guys have.
Aw, shit. Nevermind. I don't have an Hydra account because it was nuked for not logging in and/or not running anything for a while.
Oh well.
Use A4D. Enuf said.
What shits me about the whole situation is the fact that we as affiliates have no control over the credit worthiness of the advertisers nor can we do any sort of due dilligence YET when it all goes to shit...we are the ones that get stuck with the bill???
What shits me about the whole situation is the fact that we as affiliates have no control over the credit worthiness of the advertisers nor can we do any sort of due dilligence YET when it all goes to shit...we are the ones that get stuck with the bill???
^ Yo, is it cool if I use that T&C paragraph for a network I'm starting?
Actually, it makes perfect sense. Look at it in another scenario...
Say I buy a car from a dealership but a couple of months later, I lose my job and can't pay the payments. The bank I had a loan agreement would certainly understand that they don't get their money because I didn't get my money from my job...right?
Wait, no...perhaps that wasn't the best analogy.
Ok, so say I run a paper company called Dunder Mifflin and I lose my largest account to Staples and can't afford to pay my sales force. CERTAINLY, they'd understand...right?
No? Damnit!
I guess when I bought that car I should have alerted the bank that it was in my T&C that if I lost my job they'd have to suck it up...after all, it WAS in my T&C.
(Notice: Terms and Conditions subject to change without prior notice. It is your responsibility to keep our terms and conditions page up in an open tab 24 hours a day while hitting F5 repeatedly just in case we decide to change paragraph 5, sentence 4, word 7 that states that we have decided not to pay you for legitimate services provided by you in spite of any and all prior written, electronic, or verbal agreement. We do this in accordance with no known federal, state, or local laws and only with the presumption that you will take it in the ass and smile while you do so because we we paid for cheap sluts to sit beside you at our ASE parties Nick Throlson style. If you would like to make a formal complaint you can reach your affiliate manager via telephone if he happens to feel like taking or returning your call, which he probably won't if we owe you money. If that doesn't work, you can sit around staring at AIM all day waiting for him to log on but he's suddenly nowhere to be found now that we owe you money. In this event, please have the courtesy to keep your complaints off of public message boards because that's just not fair to us, mmkay?)
What shits me about the whole situation is the fact that we as affiliates have no control over the credit worthiness of the advertisers nor can we do any sort of due dilligence YET when it all goes to shit...we are the ones that get stuck with the bill???
How the fuck is that right?...T&C's aside.
Its part of the networks responsibilities to vet their advertisers and if required make them pre-pay...if the network gets shafted thats business and you should tighten up your credit controls. But to pass it on to a third party that has no control over the credit process is morally bereft.
Pay the man you fuckers!
P.S and I aint talking about re-bills either.
I totally agree with this. You as affiliates don't know the credit worthiness of the advertiser. So there's no way you should be held responsible if someone else doesn't get paid cause they made a bad judgement in risk management.
As a person mentioned before escrow's and prepay's are becoming much more the norm on the network side of things. Lets think about how things are for a second.
New company can't get loan to prepay network. Yet network extends credit to advertisers. If the risk is so high the bank won't work with them, then why should we take them on either?
Everyone talks about their T&C's as far as not having to pay affiliates if they don't get paid. I think that's the industry standard. It's just a contract and all contracts are negotiable. If you want to have a Contract that says the network has to pay you on time even if the advertiser doesn't pay them. Have your atty write it up and make them sign it. Don't play victim, take control and if you're not happy how things are change them or get them changed.
Start a movement of affiliates that will only work with networks that guarantee certain things. But that would take unity and a desire to change the industry vs. make the quickest buck possible. It's up to you. The ball is always in the affiliates court it's just up to you to collectively assert your will and hold to your values.
Going direct will not solve this issue of nonpayment. However, I'd much rather get an extra 20%-50% and have a direct line to the advertiser and deal with the Net30-Net45 and possible non payment risk for that extra margin.