The Tea Party has officially lost it



And I could possibly grow wings out of my ass and fly to the moon.

Probability however, quite low.

I'd put her chances at 50/50, maybe even higher, considering she's running against a full-blown self-admitted Marxist.
 
Christine_ODonnell.jpg


I'd still hit it.

I'd:
1. Hit it 2 times.
2. Let her lick my butthole.
3. Vote for her.
 
I'd:
1. Hit it 2 times.
2. Let her lick my butthole.
3. Vote for her.

Please feel free to do 1 and 2. However, skip number 3. I have to live here. I'd really like her to go away after she loses the election so I don't have to hear her anymore.

If you don't know why I don't want to listen anymore...........


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPeCfB7Fj8A"]YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00yYVIyB0NM"]YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.[/ame]
 
Most voters wouldn't mind the super religious beliefs, but admitting into dabbling into witchcraft is gonna be tough for voters to swallow:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nECxQUi_pr0"]YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.[/ame]
 
Hilarious how they're going after her the same way they went after Palin, replete with the sexual objectification. Almost like a premade template.

What they, and the vast majority of the brainwashed goons on here don't understand, is that the sum of those beliefs affects people less than if the Communist Coons wins and jacks up both spending and taxes.

THAT would affect people more than whether she believes in fossils, mice experiments, or the Middle Earth role of women. And THAT'S why she could possibly win.

But you're mostly idiots, which is why you don't realize that.

What? Dude she's an absolute nut (and wants to stop you from busting one). I don't want Coons to win either, and Castle was too left too - but this is the best? No way. She's a moron.
 
What? Dude she's an absolute nut (and wants to stop you from busting one). I don't want Coons to win either, and Castle was too left too - but this is the best? No way. She's a moron.

You still don't get it. You all still don't. For Tea Party members, there's only one thing that matters. And Christine O'Donnell will vote the right way for that one thing, and that's the only thing that counts.

You all can do nothing but watch.
 
ok i mean I really like the idea of lower taxes and less spending even though I'm not a US resident. You guys spend a lot of money on crap that isn't really needed. Plus I'd really welcome a third or fourth party into your way too 2-sided democratic system.

but how is the tea party going to solve it all? From these about 100 posts that I see on this forum that are all about glorifying this great party... I don't really see ANY answers about HOW they'd solve those problems.

the thing is: Keeping the populist crap up forever isn't gonna do anything except getting them elected by sheeple. --- OOOO WAIT, that's what they want.
 
I don't really see ANY answers about HOW they'd solve those problems.

I think the tea party stands for a smaller government, less spending and lowering taxes.

Oh, and I think they pretty much want obamacare reversed. Which, I think pretty much everybody hear can agree should be thrown out.
 
I think the tea party stands for a smaller government, less spending and lowering taxes.

Oh, and I think they pretty much want obamacare reversed. Which, I think pretty much everybody hear can agree should be thrown out.

how are they going to turn the current government into a "smaller" government? Don't they want to create jobs? (according to her speech, she wants to bring jobs back to delaware). Turning the government into a smaller one means destroying pointless jobs and would increase unemployment (yes, maybe only for a short amount of years, but it would) - oh snap.
 
how are they going to turn the current government into a "smaller" government? Don't they want to create jobs? (according to her speech, she wants to bring jobs back to delaware). Turning the government into a smaller one means destroying pointless jobs and would increase unemployment (yes, maybe only for a short amount of years, but it would) - oh snap.

Smaller government = less cost to run.

Less cost = less taxes.

Less taxes = more money to spend in the private sector.

More spending cash in the private sector = more employment (read up on capital expenditures, expansion of business, innovation, competition, market share, etc).

..... Can't believe I actually had to map this out. Since you're European I'll give you a pass though.
 
Smaller government = less cost to run.

Less cost = less taxes.

Less taxes = more money to spend in the private sector.

More spending cash in the private sector = more employment (read up on capital expenditures, expansion of business, innovation, competition, market share, etc).

..... Can't believe I actually had to map this out. Since you're European I'll give you a pass though.

^^^^^ This


Damn, I thought everybody knew this stuff.