I just paid $480 to the wonderful state of California on evidence based on red light camera - for not stopping at a red before turning right!!! And there were no other cars in the intersection.
In CA, turning right on a red is the same offence as driving straight through a red - go figure.
i see no reason why fines shouldn't be means tested. a 100 euro fine would mean nothing to a multi-millionaire, this is really a punishment
i think it's the fairest of all methods. let your speeding ticket amount be a fair percentage of your financial worth/income. for example, a 400 dollar fine for an average joe making 50k a year (which one can get for speeding here in vancouver, canada) translates to around $184,000 for one who is worth 23 mil. the weight of the penalty will thus be felt for both circumstances.
I always thought that fines should be proportional to someone's income.
A fine is a punishment.
If someone makes $10hr and gets a $100 fine they have to work 10 hours to pay it off. If someone makes $1,000/hr they only have to work 6 minutes to pay the same fine.
One gets punished 10hrs of labor the other one 6 min. Not fair.
Just an example of government existing to not care about economics. IMO, if your damage to society by speeding is $100, you should be billed $100. If you value speeding more than $100, you'll speed. Problem solved; efficiency reached.
Actually IMO the government should stay out of roads entirely, but...
In CA, turning right on a red is the same offence as driving straight through a red - go figure.
ooooo rli? I wonder why ....