Houcemtrigun,
It's good to hear your viewpoint; I am tired of hearing the same old reasons by stupid Christians for religion. So no matter how mean ppl treat you on this board and in life, thanks for speaking up. Variety is a good thing.
Now, about your understanding of atheism; it is insulting. From your quote below, I understand that you see Atheists as people who have something inside of them that yearn to worship the one true god but don't do so because they don't want to sound stupid or illogical.
Nothing, at all, could be further from the truth. That's like me saying you must have a homosexual love for Muhammad if you want to worship him.
(I am
not saying this; I know better. This is an example to show you how outrageous what you said about Atheists is to us.)
A major part of Atheism is the LACK of having irrational feelings. If you insist on projecting your feelings onto atheists then you will forever be an insulting idiot to us that is at the same time to be laughed at for having a large amount of ignorance.
Since you have 'feelings' we wouldn't dream of telling you to stop feeling them. Seriously... No Atheist I've ever known would want you to stop worshiping whomever you feel you have to worship. We know it is pointless...
But the second you cross the line and tell anyone else they must worship the same god as you, that makes you EVIL, and many of us feel that is a real "Sin," like murder or being a slavemaster. (I personally feel it is exactly the same as being a slavemaster.)
Anyway, your idea that "Humans need to believe in something" is simply flawed to the core. Once you can accept that only PEOPLE WHO FEEL IRRATIONAL THINGS need to believe in something, and others don't, you won't be so insulting to those of us who don't.
Lastly, could you further comment on your words: "Our logic makes us believe there is a creator all the time." -This sounds so silly & backwards to me I'd really like some clarification, and to see if you are at all serious in this statement.
Atheism and Logic:
Before I go ahead, I want to illustrate a point a lot of people don't really bother to think about. That is honesty.
Before I started diving into this whole matter I swore to myself I would be honest to myself and I would follow whatever route I find to be right no matter how inconvenient it can be for me. It's about doing what is right and not what is easier.
It's easy to say I am atheist. I can define my rules the way I want. Does this mean I am right? It's easy to say that (ln(x+3)+3xLn(x^3+5)/exp(3x^2+4))=1 but does this mean that the result is correct?
You see, logically speaking, there are more evidences for the existance of a God than the opposite. It's just inconvenient for most people to accept a system that tells them they are wrong (marketers know this better than anybody else).
Lets forget for a moment the 3 religions.
Question 1: What is a god per definition?
A: A god is anything you believe in.
This is the first argument against atheists. How?
The medecine says: The existance of a need is the proof of the existance of something that can satisfy it while benefiting the body.
Ex: Hunger means that there is food that would do you well.(You could eat something poisonous that will make you feel well but kill you afterwards).
Humans need to believe in something. Even atheists believe in something. They believe that there is no god. That's like a poisonous food you eat. You will feel full but die afterwards.
2- Our logic makes us believe there is a creator all the time. We just try not to listen to it when it comes to us.
Explanation: When you see a Ferrari or a Lamborgini, you think instinctively at how savvy the constructors must be. You don't say "Unbelievable what the chance can make?". But when it comes to us, humans, you think it's more logical to think it's the chance that created us although we are WAAAAYYYY more complex than a mere car.