England and Muslims....



I just read that the survey is skewed. They counted all alternate spellings of "Mohammed" but not any other name, like John/Jon. Apparently, because of this, the *actual* #1 name in England is "Oliver".
 
I just read that the survey is skewed. They counted all alternate spellings of "Mohammed" but not any other name, like John/Jon. Apparently, because of this, the *actual* #1 name in England is "Oliver".

Fuckkkkkkkkk, I was going to say: "In b4 Subigo finds a way to say it's not true".

Like clockwork...

Edit:

I just read that the survey is skewed. They counted all alternate spellings of "Mohammed" but not any other name, like John/Jon. Apparently, because of this, the *actual* #1 name in England is "Oliver".
The article above says that...
 
Hense: The article is skewed.

I don't follow you, are you splitting hairs that the title of the article wasn't: "More babies named Mohammed and Muhammed than are named Oliver and Olivar"? Seems like a pretty trivial point to make when the article is about birthing trends and shifting demographics and not about peoples proclivities for particular vowel selection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VonRohn
Good point, if they combined all the Jon/John/Jean/Ian/Euan/Sean things might be a bit different.

I went out with a couple of muslim birds lately on dates. They both smoked like crazy which is haram but stay unfortunately they stayed halal when it comes to getting their flanges out. Hey ho.
 
I don't follow you, are you splitting hairs that the title of the article wasn't: "More babies named Mohammed and Muhammed than are named Oliver and Olivar"? Seems like a pretty trivial point to make when the article is about birthing trends and shifting demographics and not about peoples proclivities for particular vowel selection.

There were more "John" names than "Muhammed" names, but that's not talked about in the article. The actual survey takes unique spellings into account, the article does not.
 
On another note, I was reading some comments, and some of those users are fucking ignorant.

Like the following
- "I'd like to piggyback on your question and ask why it's ok to blow up falafel stands when women and children are present?"
- "One set of rules for them, another for everyone else. Double standards galore on display for the world to see, yet many are giving it the blind eye. At the end of the day, it does NOT pass the clemency test."

They are in the mindset that all Muslim's are terrorists.

That ignorance is half the reason we are in the shit we are in.

Action = Reaction.
 
There were more "John" names than "Muhammed" names, but that's not talked about in the article. The actual survey takes unique spellings into account, the article does not.

But surveys in and of themselves are worthless without context, the article provides context. Given what a small percentage muslims are of the populace of Great Britian the names, aggregated and even allowing for the penchant for muslims to name a kid mohammed, explains how a phrase like "demographics is destiny" came about. You don't have to politicize an event or trend to acknowledge that it exists.
 
But surveys in and of themselves are worthless without context, the article provides context. Given what a small percentage muslims are of the populace of Great Britian the names, aggregated and even allowing for the penchant for muslims to name a kid mohammed, explains how a phrase like "demographics is destiny" came about. You don't have to politicize an event or trend to acknowledge that it exists.

But. It. Was. Not. On. The. Top. Of. The. List.

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/names1010.pdf

How is this so hard to understand?
 
So I had two Muslims over to my house today. Which is why we had pineapple chicken pizza. Which is actually pretty yummy.

Diversity is good.
 
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AsxYiFSE6s"]YouTube - The Kid from Brooklyn Mexicans in-Muslims out[/ame]