Can you explain the fact that humans can NOT digest red meat?
"Fact"... what a bunch of bullshit.
It is bullshit. We can digest red meat. It may rot in our colon for 3 days, but we can digest it.
But I agree with supersundas... humans do not need meat to survive. Eating meat is taking a life because you like the taste of it. And luckily everyone gets to make that choice for themselves.
I agree, and that's what pisses me off about the ban on fox hunting in the uk.
The main argument is that its wrong to hunt for fun, but we kill thousands of animals everyday for fun. We don't need meat, but we eat it because we enjoy it. To me there's no difference there.
What a load of crap. There's a massive fucking difference between hunting or fishing just for sport and doing the same or farming for food.
I love wild fish and game and think we all should eat more of it (made a great venison stew yesterday...tasty!) The animal might have a less humane death than if it was farmed but it's life will have been a lot better and that is reflected in the taste of the meat. Compare wild to farmed duck for example, or salmon (although due to overfishing the ethics of continuing to eat them are questionable).
Hunting just for sport is despicable imo, why kill an animal if you aren't going to use it? We should use as much of the animal as possible too, not just for food. It saddens me that due the great work of PETA and others some Alaskan natives can no longer find buyers for the pelts from the seals they kill for food.
Killing animals for food is not just because we enjoy the taste. We may not need to eat meat but we are naturally omnivores and we do need the protein and nutrients meat provides. The reason most of desire meat and enjoy the taste is because our body knows that it is a great source of the stuff we need.
Having said that, I don't think the government should have banned fox hunting as banning anything is rarely a good solution. A better option would have been to prosecute where animal cruelty could be proved.
It is bullshit. We can digest red meat. It may rot in our colon for 3 days, but we can digest it.
But I agree with supersundas... humans do not need meat to survive. Eating meat is taking a life because you like the taste of it. And luckily everyone gets to make that choice for themselves.
I guess its just opinion but the way I see it is that killing a rabbit because one person will enjoy eating it is no better or worse than killing a fox because 100 people will enjoy catching it. Neither are necessary but both are enjoyed. Personally I don't see a problem with either activities.
EDIT: also this idea that the fox died for nothing is bullshit, the fox died so loads of people could have an exciting day out in the fresh air. The argument that animals hunted for food die for a reason is also valid, but only because they can provide enjoyment in the form of a tasty meal, nothing to do with preserving human life. If anything from a utilitarian point of view fox hunting is far superior.
Everytime some tree hugging vegan faggot posts a video like that it makes my want to go buy two double cheese burgers from McDonalds, that way I can eat one (cause they're fuckin delicious) and so I can throw the other one away just to piss off the tree hugging vegan faggot.
If your local grocer sold McDonalds Double Cheeseburgers, they would be called "Beef Flavored Food". There's about as much beef in one of those as there is in a chicken leg.
McDonalds burger patties are 100% pure USDA inspected beef with no additives or fillers. They are supplied by Lopez Foods in Oklahoma.
They may be technically 100% beef, but so much crap such as connective tissue is classed as meat, yet provides next to no nutritional value.
That's bullshit. Watch the video I linked to earlier.
My problem with McDonald's isn't the food anyway, or even the McJobs and McObesity. It's the effect they have on small businesses and their reliance on and encouragement of intensive farming that are the bigger problems.
not once have I seen a McDonalds coming to a town cause other restaurants to close.
In my home town I remember McDonald's opening (I used to work there!) and it took loads of business away from the small independent cafe places. (No real competition with actual restaurants)
Just watched. Assume that's US only as here they state that it's 100% British & Irish beef. Although it wouldn't surprise me if they ship it halfway around the world to be processed then shipped back. Do you know if Lopez supply McDonald's in Spain?
Besides, I'm not saying that McDonald's don't use 100% beef just that (here anyway, poss. EU wide) "beef" can include elements that have no nutritional value. Nothing in that video indicates that these elements are removed prior to processing and it would seem logical that they would use as much of the animal as they can.