Wow, that's outrageous! That's even worse than saying Malik Nidal Hasan wasn't a terrorist!
Fox News Lies Again...
- Thread starter PeerFly
- Start date
Wow, that's outrageous! That's even worse than saying Malik Nidal Hasan wasn't a terrorist!
They 'owned' her only if you believe Politico's assertion that she was blaming the Dems. She never mentioned the Dems. Did you forget she's no fan of the Repubs either?
i just dont get it...
if you hate fox news, then dont watch it. DONE
I am a lib, and i don't like Fox news, so i don't watch it. Why piss yourself off?
I can see why conservatives don't like MSNBC, because its biased for us.
Fox is simply better at it. (they are smart enough to use hot chicks)
if you hate fox news, then dont watch it. DONE
I am a lib, and i don't like Fox news, so i don't watch it. Why piss yourself off?
I can see why conservatives don't like MSNBC, because its biased for us.
Fox is simply better at it. (they are smart enough to use hot chicks)
She has tons of conservative support.....admitted. (That didn't win her last election did it?)
Yes, I am one vote...so are you.....negated.
Sometimes marginalizing someone is good for mankind.....lol (and for the Alaskan wolves)
Simple. Keep your enemies closer.
She was definitely implying her blame of the Dems.
If they didn't want it to be all "Fox News" then the channel wouldn't be "Fox News". They could put their biased commentary on regular Fox (not sure how long that'd last though).
All networks have some biased agenda, that's clear. But, why would the entire Obama administration deliberately ignore Fox News if we both know that all networks can have leaning agendas? It's because Fox News IS the right.
I find it funny when I flip through the channels and see Glenn Beck, with a Fox NEWS logo on the bottom left of the screen. Or Hannity, or Fox and Friends, or O'Reilly... shows who all claim they are part of a network that is "Fair and Balanced" or "The Most Powerful Name in NEWS".
Don't forget that Chris Wallace hosts "Fox NEWS Sunday" who leans right on just about every topic he discusses. Remember the Clinton interview? His numerous appearances on the Howie Carr show (conservative talk radio).
They are also about the only cable news network not to report the positive attributes of the current administration. They obviously cannot twist factual news stories, but they easily dodge and duck positive stories that have to do with the current admin... or press conferences.
They are really your enemies? how? because their beliefs are different than yours? Wow...
Well yeah.... but it's not a "wow" thing.
They're not my "enemy" simply because of their beliefs, beliefs are benign on their own. It's the actions that their beliefs cause them to take that I have a problem with.
He is being transparent (def: free of deceit).
He wants to avoid the channel that will commentate and twist everything he does and say.
If he wants to be "free of deceit" why would he want things he says and do twisted and shat onto the public's face.
Just the opposite, and it's not an attack. It's pointing fingers and laughing at a scared political party and their idiotic news network. This is nothing new coming from Fox news, but it never gets old either.
Dude, they create the rallies because they don't agree with the decisions being made in Washington. There were all types of democratic rallies during the Bush years... but you probably wouldn't know that since the only news outlet you obviously watch is Fox News.
Using your logic, he would be required to stay away from MSNBC and the rest.
His lack of transparency is evident in the fact that he can only hang with reporters that are going to lob him softball questions as he runs for cover and lets Robert Gibbs and David Axelrod spin it all out for him.
Assumptions about me eh? Those are very dangerous.
I'm willing to give you a pass on this one though since I got a good laugh when you used 'probably' as synonymous with 'obviously'.
I forgot, she doesn't like real conservatism, she'd rather push a moral agenda. Better keep forcing that abstinence "sex ed" in schools so our 17 year olds don't have babies. Wait, what?
Huh? MSNBC is nothing but commentary, and CNN is just horrible. Fox News has their share of shit obviously, as well.
If you think Obama is being transparent, you're blind. 5 days of public comment on bills my ass.
No, instead let's hand out free condoms and give classes on fisting. Heaven forbid we advocate that 15-year old girls not act like sluts, right?
Or how about you leave it to the parents? Man, what a novel concept. Mandated abstinence education has done nothing but increase the teen pregnancy and STD rate. Either teach everything, or teach nothing. Teach abstinence along side birth control and condoms, or teach none of it at all.
They don't think of things like that.
It's not in their Biiible. ( I love the line... "Keep your rosaries off my ovaries!")
Right, those same parents that are out working while the state is busy indoctrinating students from birth till they're spit out as college-educated Marxists. Parental influence is gone, dude.
And that's a brilliant idea. Hand out condoms while simultaneously telling them not to use them until their wedding day. You're quick to pump out anti-abstinence facts(which I would add are highly suspect), while at the same time suspiciously quiet on sex-'ed' effects. Shouldn't you be shouting its successes from the rooftops? Where are the stats on its' effectiveness? Quit the moral equivocating and make a decision. It's an either/or.