GG Romney

Basically saying you don't represent 47% of the US when you are running for president of the entire US is an extremely stupid thing to say.
 


He did make a valid point that 47% parents will vote for our current President no matter what. It's the people in the middle that he has to sway. There was nothing incorrect about that statement. However, they are twisting it now and are saying he means he doesn't care about the 47% 'should he be' Presdient.

You are leaving out the part where he said that 47% of voters (who have higher average incomes than nonvoters) do not pay income taxes, which is completely false.

Half the people who voted for Obama may have done so in a "lesser of two evils" type of way. Those are people that Romney needs to go after, but by telling them that they do not pay taxes he is giving a big middle finger to those people.
 
74867_484731388211342_1426755_n.jpg


also,

400883_343452079076026_1143216197_n.jpg


and finally,

386775_347913065289852_2140589848_n.jpg
 
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgeJf6h6uOc"]OWS video: Police attack photographer, violently arrest protesters - YouTube[/ame]


^^^ 4 more years of this... no thanks. I find it interesting that those that did not earn $$$$ thinks they can vote someone into office to get $$$ they did not earn.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge3aGJfDSg4]Obama In 1998: "I Actually Believe In Redistribution" - YouTube[/ame]
 
I don't think Romney said anything different than you hear on Limbaugh or this forum every day. So he prob didn't hurt any standing with his base. He possibly hurt some with independents/moderates but who knows. It's more that the media has decided this is a defining event so they're hyping it like crazy.
 
he didnt say anything that wasn't true.

Ah yes, but 47 percent can't handle the truth! Besides, the truth doesn't sound as nice as typical, patronizing political sound bites - although it does ring of pragmatic business man.

I still think the Repubs kept the most solid, realistic candidates in the wings for the election to follow this one if Romney isn't able to pull it off for them in 2012. Watch for real game-changers in 2016 or 2022. Just an educated guess, of course.
 
4 more years of this... no thanks. I find it interesting that those that did not earn $$$$ thinks they can vote someone into office to get $$$ they did not earn.
When the fuck are you going to open your eyes and see what's as plain as day in front of your face?

DUBYA originated the policies that made that film possible. You think R$ would repeal them???

The Two Parties are just one party. When are you going to see this?

The GOP propaganda worked very well on you. I bet if they told you that the only way to get obomba out was to wear a clown suit and give them a blowjob, you'd be first in line!
 
When the fuck are you going to open your eyes and see what's as plain as day in front of your face?

DUBYA originated the policies that made that film possible. You think R$ would repeal them???

The Two Parties are just one party. When are you going to see this?

The GOP propaganda worked very well on you. I bet if they told you that the only way to get obomba out was to wear a clown suit and give them a blowjob, you'd be first in line!

Luke, for ThisWebThing to understand that he would have to actually read the articles he posts... he just reads the headlines.

Try this-

Obama Vs. Romney - Voting Like There's Only One Option
 
^^^for once I'm going to agree with luke and call you a silly face. they are both out to snatch your paper, it makes no difference who you vote for.