I'm not questioning the fact that there's a problem with industry lobbying efforts.
What I'm questioning is whether Kim Dotcom is a good source of information and the best poster-boy to fight the MPAA/RIAA.
I wanted to get some balanced perspective on the case, and I couldn't get any anywhere.
He has as much skin in the game as anyone. If he wants to make himself the poster boy he is damn well entitled. Do you think the RIAA/MPAA's a good source for information? Both sides are going to lie and cheat so might as well get the guy with the most to loose to do it. Besides who else is willing to fight to the death for justice?
If you want a balanced perspective just Assume anything said by either side is BS. Sift through the shit and you will find the truth somewhere in the middle.