lol - I get how proxy bidding works, but I don't see a record of the bid that caused the proxy to issue a bid of $1010, then $1510, then...$2243.
As previously mentioned:
Basically, after each "bidder vs. bidder" battle, the system displays the winning bid. Proxy bidding is used by all major auction sites and represents the best possible bidding system IMO.
Let's assume that we have a bidding war, with $10 increments, for the domain blabla.com and that:
1) Bidder 1 places a proxy bid of $100, then bidder 2 places a proxy bid of $200. The winning bid by the person who won this let's call it "battle" or whatever is displayed on the site, in other words $110 by bidder 2.
2) Let's assume that bidder 3 places a bid of $180. Since bidder 2 placed a proxy bid of $200, we have another battle. Once again, the winning bid by the person who won is displayed, in other words a $190 bid by bidder 2 (since his proxy bid is higher than the $180 maximum bid placed by bidder 3 and this is an auction with $10 increments).
The system is identical to that used by Sedo, the only difference is the fact that Sedo would have displayed the bids placed by bidder 3 as well but that's kind of stupid IMO, since it's obvious that he offered the amount which currently makes bidder 2 the winner - $10. I think that having a universal rule (only display the winning bid after each "bidder vs. bidder" battle) is a better idea, I might be wrong but that's my decision for Auctionpus.com.
I'll go with $10 increments for all of the auctions, so it's easy to figure out how much the other guy (bidder 3 in our case) offered. Just take the winning bid and subtract $10
