Romney will Win. Romney: 52.9 Obama: 47.1

ThisWebThing

ThisWebThing

New member
Aug 23, 2010
843
11
0
So says University of Colorado, what makes this interesting is that they have
predicted every U.S. president since 1980.


100% Track record, worth a read.


Article Here
 


eohBA.gif


45gDN.gif


fUyKH.gif


8OdNO.gif
 
Nate Silver @ FiveThirtyEight gives Obama a 68.4% chance of winning. He was by far the most accurate guy around last election.
 
LULZ...

UC has wrong this time. Obomba by 65%, easily. Romney doesn't have any supporters worth speaking of at all. Just a few random idiots who don't believe in HIM, they just hate obomba... And they don't number as many as the people who have awaken and decided to either not vote or vote 3rd Party.

It is odd how little credit their findings give to other influences... It's a study on economics alone, nothing to do with their many other issues like abortion rights, who has the best hair, who likes the candidate in their own party, etc... Seems really basic to me.
 
lukep said:
LULZ...

UC has wrong this time. Obomba by 65%, easily. Romney doesn't have any supporters worth speaking of at all. Just a few random idiots who don't believe in HIM, they just hate obomba... And they don't number as many as the people who have awaken and decided to either not vote or vote 3rd Party.

It is odd how little credit their findings give to other influences... It's a study on economics alone, nothing to do with their many other issues like abortion rights, who has the best hair, who likes the candidate in their own party, etc... Seems really basic to me.
Click to expand...

How can anyone believe ANYTHING that you type when you were 100% sure that Paul is going the be the next president?
 
The only way he is going to win is if there is an "accident" & something happens to that colored guy
 
makethatgreen said:
How can anyone believe ANYTHING that you type when you were 100% sure that Paul is going the be the next president?
Click to expand...
WTF?

Look Lincoln lover, since you obviously have a learning disability of some kind I'll try to go easy on you and use small words:

There is a difference between supporting a candidate and claiming he is going to win.

I still, to this day, stand behind my statements that Paul has the MAJORITY of conservative and independant voters out there, and could easily beat Obomba in a fair fight too, but I never said he "Would" win, I said he "Could" win.

Lots of WF members here have supported RP too, and still do. What made you think my support was a claim at future prognostication while theirs wasn't?

Sheesh. You try and help the world and this is the thanks you get...

What should I expect though? You're obviously a typical american voter, getting all of your info from a perceived soundbyte and don't even bother to read the underlying story.
 
Who cares. The world still has brown people that haven't been bombed yet. Let's get our priorities straight people!
 
lukep said:
WTF?

Look Lincoln lover, since you obviously have a learning disability of some kind I'll try to go easy on you and use small words:

There is a difference between supporting a candidate and claiming he is going to win.

I still, to this day, stand behind my statements that Paul has the MAJORITY of conservative and independant voters out there, and could easily beat Obomba in a fair fight too, but I never said he "Would" win, I said he "Could" win.

Lots of WF members here have supported RP too, and still do. What made you think my support was a claim at future prognostication while theirs wasn't?

Sheesh. You try and help the world and this is the thanks you get...

What should I expect though? You're obviously a typical american voter, getting all of your info from a perceived soundbyte and don't even bother to read the underlying story.
Click to expand...

471.jpg
 
my own politics aside, this one's hard to gauge:

we haven't seen 'confidence fatigue' in this country for this length of time. the last major housing crisis was not paired with anywhere near as lackluster a job market.

since the market collapse and bailout was the result of previous chiefs, i see this one surviving. the debates, i assume will be a scratch affair. maybe obama comes ahead. but not by much because his sweet cadence will only resonate so far w/out economic stats to support his efforts.

i don't think any of us have been alive long enough to have seen an election cycle like this. 1980 is the closest approximation, but not close enough to draw conclusions, imo.
 
Would have cared if Ron Paul was in the scene. Obama or Romney whoever wins we are the losers
 
lukep said:
LULZ...

UC has wrong this time. Obomba by 65%, easily. Romney doesn't have any supporters worth speaking of at all. Just a few random idiots who don't believe in HIM, they just hate obomba... And they don't number as many as the people who have awaken and decided to either not vote or vote 3rd Party.

It is odd how little credit their findings give to other influences... It's a study on economics alone, nothing to do with their many other issues like abortion rights, who has the best hair, who likes the candidate in their own party, etc... Seems really basic to me.
Click to expand...

Curious LukeP - were you a supporter of Perot too? Not that many would admit it. But that's how Clinton won wasn't it? A third party that stole conservative votes. That's who Paul is.

I have also seen a tendency in your posts to sound a lot like Perot. He too was an advocate of spending in the right places, that even though he did not have an exact solution for everything at the moment that he could pull together top talent and put together a solution.
 
Unarmed Gunman said:
Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil...
Click to expand...

yes, philosophically.

But there is a difference between the two with regard to the economy, jobs, etc.

No difference in many aspects of rights and freedom, but I believe in working within the system. We can talk about the fantasy that I will be motivated enough to try and bring about a revolution of change, but the fact is I am interested in the well being for as many people as possible here and now.

That leads me to Romney not Obama.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom