This stuff is far better explained in the OP's film when the guy talked about the percentage of the country's islamification being directly proportional to their behavior. They became Stage 3 Jihadists in Saudi Arabia, only Stage 2 Jihadists in Turkey... This theory of his fits the facts perfectly.Depends on the country. If you do it in a theocracy, like Iran or Saudi, then sure. In a secular democracy like Turkey, probably not.
LOL; neither is Muhammad.Also, different religions have different taboos. "Buddha" isn't God, and neither is "Shiva".
HA! What a pile of horseshit!Try insulting the King in Thailand. The reason he's so revered is that many believe him to be a bodhisattva.
The Thais are the least superstitious people on earth. Sure there are some crackpots that believe more like the chinese but in general you can't even find a thai on the street that believes there is any kind of god or afterlife at all. Church to them has nothing at all to do with religion, it's more like a place for troubled teens...
As for the king, they love him for his awesomely kind deeds, and if you care to read about them you'll love him just as fervently too. The man spent his life doing incredibly noble things for them... But insinuating that he's going to be reincarnated or become a god to the average thai and they'll look at you like you're a lunatic.
Where do you come up with this horseshit?
Their book commands them to be so, & the actions of a majority fit in with those commands.But to make leap and say "all muslims are terrorists in waiting", as OP inferred makes as much sense as the old radical feminist saw that "all men are rapists".
(I say majority because in different cultures they always still fit into Jihadist stages 1, 2, or 3.)
Those muslims who want nothing to do with the book and it's evil instructions are no longer muslim in my mind and I hold no ill will against at all. But the ones defending the book are literally defending their "right" to kill me, so they need to be the ones who die first.
I'm fully aware that they hate each other, but they DO NOT hate each other as much as the infidel. You are wrong here.For a start, the idea that "Muslims" are one group is as accurate as saying "Christians" are one group. There are Shia, Sunni and Sufis for a start, and they hate on each other as much as they they hate on outsiders.
100% of extremism is supported by their instruction book.99% of extremism today is based on Wahhabi Islam, which is like of the Westboro Baptist Church of Islam. The reason it's so widespread is because of the immense money and power of one of its biggest proponents - the House of Saud.
The day that all muslims burn that evil book together is the day I'll stop calling all of them extremists.
You are blind sir. It may yet be the death of you.