Breitbart simply licenses Reuters and AP stories, and Drudge simply links to other stories. These liberal bitches are really getting tedious.
Turn to FOX news, count the seconds until...
- Thread starter subigo
- Start date
Breitbart simply licenses Reuters and AP stories, and Drudge simply links to other stories. These liberal bitches are really getting tedious.
ANY source that publishes a story that doesn't shine a good light on BO is not a news source to libfucks.
This is very evident for example at Huffpost. When they post a story concerning how great the sweet potatoes are growing in BO garden the libs all circle jerk while getting chills running up their legs. If the same lib rag Huffpost puts out a story that questions ANY of BO policies, then all of a sudden the lib mob turns on the blog and Arianna.
It really is amazing. It makes me realize more and more that the liberal side of the Democratic party is ran by a bunch of spoiled brat college freshman.
Considering we're engaged in a war against terrorism on 2 fronts, and the largest failed terrorist attempt since 9/11 occurred in front of our eyes on Christmas day, wouldn't it be journalistically irresponsible for a 24/7 news network not to mention those particular buzzwords in such frequency?
I'd rather get the real, cold-hard news then be spoon-fed brainless shit about the fucking Obama dog, or Sasha and Malia's soccer games, or Michele Obama's newest pair of $2300 shoes, or Barack's workout regimen.
Totally. That's why (in your words) "the most socialist senator" in the U.S just won the presidency a year ago... right?
p.s. - FOX doesn't have the highest ratings when it comes to airing actual news, just their opinion shows (which happens to be 87% of what they air). http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/13/cable-news-ratings-for-monday-january-12/10776
If you think that BO won because it was a socialist/leftist mandate from the American people than you are wrong. The sheep were brainwashed by every news channel to hate bush. BO played them well and lied his way into office.
The mandate wasnt there people were sick of Bush and wanted "hope and change" and now the sheep know they fucked themselves.
Not to mention he ran against an idiot. Obama runs against anyone but McCain and he most likely loses. He barely wins a presidential election with 52% of the vote and some idiots here think there's a mandate for socialism. Ridiculous.
No, I'm just saying that you can't say the U.S. population is leaning right, when you are using FOX news ratings as your basis for the claim. They have 3-4 million viewers, total (and air in almost 100 million homes).
Obama won the election with 69 million votes (10 million more than mccain, or 3 times as many as FOX news viewers).
Let's not forget that during the election, Obama was way further to the right (at least he pretended to be) than he actually is now. I mean come on, the guy actually sat down w/ Rick Warren and denounced Gay marriage. He was licking the Right Wing's balls to get as many votes from the middle as possible. If the Country wasn't leaning more to the right, then his breath wouldn't be so salty right now.
Speaking of news, Liars, douche Bags, and major issues. I wonder if BO is going to allow the health care debate to be shown on C-SPAN? Or do you think the fact that they bought the critical votes and will more than likely get owned every 30 seconds stop them from doing so?
I've actually been keeping score and it's funny to see 5 conservatives spank 23 liberals so handily. Of course, we do have a shitload of good lib content to refer to.
You had posted about how news stations pick from the wire based on their biases. Subigo then asked for non-biased. You then listed websites that do the exact same thing. 15 minutes before reading that I had noticed elsewhere that Breitbart himself had posted just hours before about being biased. I wouldn't have even bothered posting if it wasn't for the humorous coincidence.
I'm already well aware of both sites and would agree that there are no purely unbiased news sources.
Are You Trapped in Black-and-White Thinking?
Toot you're own bazooka much?
There's actually a hell of alot of Fox stuff out there, it's just I thought it would be redundant. A word I'm not sure that many of you are familiar with.
The only difference is that for pretty much any biased fox video you can find, there is also one floating around out there that addresses the other side of the issue.
The same can't be said for outlets such as MSNBC.